Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


Biodiversity Steering Group's Report: Response

Lord Pilkington of Oxenford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Lucas: The UK Biodiversity Steering Group was set up to advise the Government on the further development of the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The Government welcomed the Group's report at its launch in December 1995. It will publish its response tomorrow under a foreword from the Prime Minister. The response will be positive and will explain how the Government, in partnership with other sectors will implement the species and habitat action plans and carry forward the other recommendations in the report. In particular it will set out a number of new initiatives it is taking to ensure

14 May 1996 : Column WA52

that the UK maintains its leading role in the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Copies of the response will be placed in the Library.

Planning Application: Development Plan Consideration

Lord Sainsbury of Preston Candover asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they aim to base planning decisions on up-to-date local development plans and if so when they anticipate there will be national coverage of development plans, and what their average age is likely to be at that time.

Lord Lucas: Section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 requires all those making decisions on planning applications to have regard to the

14 May 1996 : Column WA53

development plan, so far as it is material to the application, and to any other material considerations. Where the development plan is material to the development proposal, Section 54A requires the decision to be made in accordance with the plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. One such consideration would be whether the development plan policies are up-to-date and apply to current circumstances, or whether they have been overtaken by events. The age of the plan (its adoption date) would not in itself be a material consideration.

The Department of the Environment's Development Plan Monitoring Survey for September 1995 indicated that 58 per cent. of non-metropolitan districts 78 per cent. of metropolitan districts and 88 per cent. of London boroughs expect to have a single district-wide local plan or unitary development plan in place by the end of 1996. The survey also indicated that 100 per cent. of all districts and London boroughs expect to have such plans in place by the end of 1999. The length of time it is taking some local authorities to adopt their local plans is a matter of concern. Her Majesty's Government have already proposed changes to amend both the code of practice on development plans and the development plan regulations. We have not ruled out further changes, including measures that will require legislation, if they are wanted by users of the development plan system. Meetings will shortly be held with interested organisations to discuss their ideas for possible changes to the system.

It is not possible to predict what the average age of development plans would be at any future date. Development planning is a continuous process. Plans are kept under constant review and once they have been adopted are updated by the local planning authority, by alteration or replacement, at appropriate intervals.

Planning Appeal Statistics

Lord Sainsbury of Preston Candover asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether recent quarterly statistics on the performance of the Planning Inspectorate in dealing with different categories of planning appeal are

14 May 1996 : Column WA54

    available in the form last published in 1992; and if so, whether they will publish them.

Lord Lucas: Responsibility for the provision of information on performance on the processing of planning appeals has been delegated to the Chief Executive of the Planning Inspectorate Agency, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter to Lord Sainsbury of Preston Candover from the Chief Planning Inspector of the Planning Inspectorate, dated 13th May 1996.

The Secretary of State for the Environment has asked me to reply to your Question about the appeal statistics published by the Planning Inspectorate.

Publication of quarterly performance figures was stopped when the Inspectorate became an Executive Agency in April 1992. The decision was made partly because these figures had never excited much interest (yours is in fact the first inquiry about them since then) but mainly because since its launch the agency has been set a range of key targets by Ministers. These are announced in the Official Report and published in our corporate documents. The targets set covered the handling time and unit cost of written planning appeals, the total volume of appeals decided as well as others designed to improve the efficiency and quality of our work. In addition, in its annual Business plan, the inspectorate publishes details of the internal targets that cover its performance in handling a range of appeal work by various procedures. The outcome of each year's work including a summary of how well we did against all our targets is a significant component of the inspectorate's annual report and accounts. It was felt that this full explanation of the inspectorate's performance would meet the needs of the majority of those who use our services more effectively than the previous arrangements.

The information on which the old quarterly returns was based is still collected and I attach copies of the quarterly performance returns covering the period to the end of December 1995. This picks up your specific question but you may also be interested to see copies of our latest business plan and annual report and accounts which both provide much more information about the inspectorate's business.

We are always glad to make up to date information on our performance available on request. Please let me know if you need any more.

Planning Appeal Statistics
1. Summary of Appeal Volumes SECTION 78(i) and 78(ii)

Quarter ending December 1995Number this quarterChange over previous quarterChange over same quarter last year
a. Number of appeals in hand at start of quarter6,950----
b. Number of appeals received during quarter3,573-62-9
c. Number of appeals withdrawn during quarter414 (11.6 per cent.)-6-31
d. Number of appeals decided during quarter3,066+342+263
e. Number of appeals in band at end of quarter7,043----

14 May 1996 : Column WA53

2. Appeals Decided, Allowed and Handling Times

Number of appeals decided Number of appeals allowed 80 per cent. handling times (weeks)
Type of appealThis quarterPrevious quarterThis quarterPrevious quarterThis quarterPrevious quarter
Inspector Written Representations2,6962,1538576732424
Inspector Inquiry12518449834137
Inspector Hearing218323811363733
Secretary of State Written Representations1116544040
Secretary of State Inquiry1623255353
Total3,0662,6999989012727

14 May 1996 : Column WA55

Planning Appeal Statistics
1. Summary of Appeal Volumes Section 78 (i) and 78(ii)

Quarter ending September 1995Number this quarterChange over previous quarterChange over same quarter last year
a. Number of appeals in hand at start of quarter6,459----
b. Number of appeals received during quarter3,635-101-9
c. Number of appeals withdrawn during quarter 420 (11.5 per cent.)+8 +12
d. Number of appeals decided during quarter2,724+405-143
e. Number of appeals in hand at end of quarter6,950----

14 May 1996 : Column WA55

2. Appeals Decided, Allowed and Handling Times

Number of appeals decided Number of appeals allowed 80 per cent. Handling Times (Weeks)
Type of AppealThis quarterPrevious quarterThis quarterPrevious quarterThis quarterPrevious quarter
Inspector Written Representations2,1671,7146785422422
Inspector Inquiry185200841033736
Inspector Hearing3253501371473329
Secretary of State Written Representations2010634042
Secretary of State Inquiry2725755360
Total2,7242,2999128002726



   Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page