Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

The noble Baroness said: This amendment will ensure that persons accredited by the police under Clause 13 are not eligible to serve as chairman or members of the Independent Police Complaints Commission. This will bring them into line with other categories of accredited person. I beg to move.

Lord Dholakia: I am rather confused. Did the Minister just talk about the members of the Police Complaints Authority under Amendment No. 193A?

The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Haskel): It is Amendment No. 194A.

Lord Dholakia: I was talking about No. 193A.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: I thought we were on Amendment No. 194A. I beg the Committees’s pardon. Amendment No. 193A was in a group that was debated and agreed previously by the Committee, and I was going to move it formally. I went straighton to the next substantive amendment, Amendment No. 194A.

Lord Dholakia: I intended to ask another question on Amendment No. 193A. I hope the Minister will not mind. This is about Section 2 of the Computer Misuse Act. I find it very difficult to understand why a person guilty of an offence in England and Wales under subsection (5) is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months, but, on summary conviction in Scotland for the same offence, is liable to a term not exceeding six months. I wanted to know precisely why there was this difference.

The second point I wanted to talk about, following the argument used by the noble Earl, Lord Northesk, was on Amendments Nos. 193A and 193B. We were talking about computer hacking. The government amendment talks about Section 5 of the Computer Misuse Act, which says:

That is as far as England and Wales are concerned. I suspect it also applies to the sheriffdom in Scotland. There are cases of computer hacking going on at

11 July 2006 : Column 694

international level. Is the Act simply restricted to what happens when a person is in this country, or does it apply internationally as well?

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: I confess that to give the noble Lord a full explanation about the latter issue would take a little time, not least because of the complexities of the matters raised by the noble Earl, Lord Northesk, who is not in his place. I ask the noble Lord if he will allow me to write to him on those matters.

On the difference between England and Wales and Scotland, the noble Lord will be only too familiar with the fact that the two jurisdictions have slight differences. The different sentences simply reflect the sentencing provisions in each jurisdiction. That is one of the consequences of devolution. The Scots have their own sentencing structure, and the sentences relate directly to the slightly different offences inthe relevant sections. It is consistent in terms of devolution, although inconsistent in terms of sentencing levels.

I hope the noble Lord is content. I had thought, because these amendments were debated already, that we would have the luxury of simply moving them, but it is always a pleasure to answer the noble Lord.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal moved Amendments Nos. 193B to 194A:

“(b) any computer containing any program or data to which the accused by doing that act secured or intended to secure unauthorised access, or enabled or intended to enable unauthorised access to be secured, was in the sheriffdom at that time.”” “Police Act 1996 (c. 16) “Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c. 23)

On Question, amendments agreed to.



11 July 2006 : Column 695

Baroness Scotland of Asthal moved Amendment No. 194B:

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal moved Amendment No. 194C:

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal moved Amendments Nos. 194D to 194F:

“Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15)

On Question, amendments agreed to.

Schedule 15, as amended, agreed to.

Schedule 16 agreed to.

Clause 51 agreed to.

Clause 52 [Extent]:

Baroness Scotland of Asthal moved Amendments Nos. 194G and 194H:



11 July 2006 : Column 696

On Question, amendments agreed to.

Clause 52, as amended, agreed to.

In the Title:

[Amendments Nos. 195 and 196 not moved.]

Baroness Scotland of Asthal moved Amendment No. 197:

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Title, as amended, agreed to.

House resumed: Bill reported with amendments.

Parliamentary Costs Bill [HL]

The Bill was reported from the Joint Committee without amendment and recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House.

National Health Service Bill [HL]

The Bill was reported from the Joint Committee with amendments and recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House; it was ordered that the Bill be printed as amended.

National Health Service (Wales) Bill [HL]

The Bill was reported from the Joint Committee with amendments and recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House; it was ordered that the Bill be printed as amended.

National Health Service (Consequential Provisions) Bill [HL]

The Bill was reported from the Joint Committee with amendments and recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House; it was ordered that the Bill be printed as amended.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page