Portcullis
House of Lords

Scrutinising European Legislation - The European Communities Committee

BRIEFING

 

Role of the Committee

The House of Lords, as part of the national parliament performs a much valued service for the United Kingdom in scrutinising and reporting on proposed European legislation.

It has done this through its European Communities Committee since 1974, the year after the United Kingdom joined the Community.

Remit and Organisation of the Committee

The Committee is appointed at the beginning of every parliamentary session. Its terms of reference are:

    To consider Community proposals whether in draft or otherwise, to obtain all necessary information about them, and to make reports on those which, in the opinion of the Committee, raise important questions to which the Committee considers that the special attention of the House should be drawn.

The Committee is chaired by a salaried Officer of the House (Principal Deputy Chairman of Committees). It has about 20 members, each of whom serves on one or more of the subject-area sub-committees through which the Committee conducts its investigations. Other lords are also co-opted to the sub-committees, so that a total of around 60 lords are actively involved in the work of the Committee or sub-committees.

Sub-Committees

    Economic & Financial Affairs, Trade and External Relations (A)
    Energy, Industry and Transport (B)
    Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection (C)
    Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (D)
    Law and Institutions (E)
    Social Affairs, Education and Home Affairs (F)

Additional sub-committees are set up ad hoc to examine specific proposals.

The Law and Institutions Sub-Committee

This has a special role in considering the legal implications of proposals for legislation. Its terms of reference are:

    To consider and report to the Committee on -

    (a) any Community proposal which would lead to significant changes in UK law, or have far reaching implications for areas of UK law other than those to which it is immediately directed;

    (b) the merits of such proposals as are referred to it by the Select Committee;

    (c) whether any important developments have taken place in Community law; and

    (d) any matters which it considers should be drawn to the attention of the Committee concerning the vires of any proposal.

How the Sub-Committees Work

The sub-committees meet regularly when the House of Lords is in session. They are assisted by clerks, and by consultant specialist advisers appointed for their expert knowledge of the subject under enquiry. The sub-committees invite written and oral evidence from government departments, Community institutions and other interested bodies and individuals, in order to consider all points of view before reaching conclusions. Draft reports setting out conclusions and recommendations are then prepared and agreed by the sub-committees, and approved by the Committee before they are published.

Over half the reports published are subsequently debated in the House. The Government has undertaken to reply to all reports, whether debated or not, within two months of publication.

How the Scrutiny System Works

Most of the work of the Committee is devoted to considering legislation proposed by the Commission under the Treaties establishing the European Community. Such proposals are submitted by the Commission to the Council. Decisions are made by the Council, with varying degrees of involvement by the European Parliament, according to the subject matter.

Such proposals are also deposited in the United Kingdom Parliament by the Government. Some 1200 documents annually are deposited, along with an explanatory memorandum, signed by a Government Minister. This sets out the legal, financial and policy implications of the proposal, and the procedure and timetable for its consideration and adoption. Many of the proposals are routine or of comparatively minor importance; in any case the number is too great for the European Communities Committee to give detailed consideration to them all.

The Chairman of the Committee therefore conducts a "sift". He considers all the explanatory memoranda, sifts the more significant proposals from the less important ones, and decides which should be referred to a sub-committee for further examination. About one-third of the proposals deposited are referred to a sub-committee.

Each sub-committee then examines the proposals which have been referred to it. A sub-committee will usually take note of many proposals, choosing e.g. a few each year on which to conduct a substantial enquiry and make a report.

The Committee may sometimes set out its views in a letter to the appropriate Government Minister if its views can be expressed succinctly without the need for extensive evidence (for example, by reference to an earlier report) or where Council decision on a proposal is likely to be reached quickly.

The scrutiny system rests on the undertaking given by the Government that they will not, except in special circumstances, agree to any proposal in the Council until it has been cleared by the Committee.

This undertaking, known as the scrutiny reserve, means that the House has an opportunity to influence the position which the Government adopts on the proposal in negotiation with other Member States of the Community.

Scrutiny of the Inter-Governmental Pillars of the European Union

The Treaty of Maastricht, which came into effect in 1993, set up the European Union comprising three "pillars":

1. The European Community and its legislation, subject to scrutiny as above.
2. A Common Foreign and Security Policy.
3. Justice and Home Affairs.

The second and third "pillars" do not involve legislation, but inter-governmental co-operation. Instruments adopted under the two inter-governmental pillars, where they are legally binding, are binding under international law and not Community law.

The Committee took the view in its report on this subject (28th Report 1992-3) that work under both inter-governmental pillars should be scrutinised by national parliaments and that draft documents should be provided to Parliament if they qualify under any one of three tests -

* Significance,
* Eventual need for United Kingdom legislation, or
* Imposition of legal commitments on the United Kingdom.

The Government has agreed (Cm 2471, February 1994) with the Committee that accountability for work under the inter-governmental pillars should be to national parliaments, and has undertaken to co-operate fully in arrangements for effective scrutiny. However the Government has not agreed that the scrutiny reserve should apply to proposals under the inter-governmental pillars.

Since 1994 the Committee has received from the Government explanatory notes or letters on several second and third pillar initiatives. Despite the absence of a scrutiny reserve, the Committee has adopted the same procedure for scrutiny of inter-governmental pillar documents as that set out above for Community legislation.

Wide-Ranging Scrutiny

Since it was set up the Committee has scrutinised and reported on a wide range of issues which affect people's everyday lives and the longer term future of both the United Kingdom and Europe. Examples include:

  • The protection of personal data
  • Pension Rights
  • Fraud and mismanagement of the Community's finances
  • Water quality standards
  • The film and television industry
  • Noise levels from manufactured equipment
  • Environmental implications of agricultural set-aside policies
  • The future of rural society
  • The protection of national cultural, historic and archaeological treasures

Further Information

For general enquiries on membership, reports, programme of work contact:

The House of Lords European Communities Committee
Telephone: 0171-219 5791/3150        Fax: 0171-219 6715



Click here to link to the European Communities Committee

Click here to link to the current session of the European Communities - Reports

Or visit the House of Lords Web Site at: www.parliament.uk





OCTOBER 1997

 
Lords Home Page Parliament Home Page Commons Home Page Search

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Revised 1 October 1999