Select Committee on European Communities Twelfth Report


4. AUTO-OIL PROGRAMME ON FUEL QUALITY AND MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS (9856/96)

Letter from John Bowis, OBE, MP, Minister for Transport in London and Road Safety, to Lord Tordoff, Chairman of the Committee

  Thank you for your letter of 17 December[5] about the Commission's Communication 9856/96 on the Auto-Oil Programme and draft Directives on fuel quality and motor vehicle emissions.

   I fully share the Committee's concern to ensure that no decision is taken now on the 2005 limits which would prejudice their revision at a later date. That is why the Government supports a Commission review by the end of 1998, of further measures necessary for 2005; and for this review to be carried out on the same basis as the initial Auto-Oil study. As indicated in the Explanatory Memorandum, the Commission need to demonstrate that a further improvement in emission limits and fuel quality is necessary in air quality terms, that any proposals to deliver such improvements take full account of the availability of the necessary cost effective technology and that fuel of the necessary quality to enable this technology to operate effectively was available.

  With regard to the use of Article 100a, I consider this to be the right Treaty base for the proposals for harmonisation of vehicle construction and fuel standards, but consider that fiscal provisions, if considered necessary, should be separately considered under an appropriate Treaty base requiring unanimity, such as Article 99.

  Finally, the Commission has not as yet responded to the views which we have presented on the inclusion of diesel fuel for off road vehicles in the proposal. I shall inform you of their response in due course.

8 January 1997

Letter from Lord Tordoff, Chairman of the Committee, to John Bowis, OBE, MP, Minister for Transport in London and for Road Safety

  Thank you for your letter of 8 January which was considered by the Select Committee at its meeting on Thursday 30 January.

  The Committee was grateful for the clarification you were able to provide on the Governments' attitude to the 2005 emission limits and on the question of the legal base. It was, however, disappointed that you did not comment on the strong expression of concern in my letter about the proposal to ban leaded petrol from 2000. The Committee would welcome an indication of how the Government intends to pursue their stated opposition to this part of the Commission proposal and what success they are having in promoting the merits of fiscal incentives as an alternative to regulation.

  We are maintaining the document under scrutiny pending your reply.

4 February 1997

Letter from John Bowis, OBE, MP, Minister for Transport in London and for Road Safety, to Lord Tordoff, Chairman of the Committee

  Thank you for your letter of 4 February about the Commission's Communication 9856/96 and draft Directives on fuel quality and motor vehicle emissions; and in particular the proposed ban on leaded petrol from 2000.

  I am sorry that you were disappointed that we did not comment on the strong expression of concern in your letter about the proposal to ban leaded petrol from 2000. We had taken your indication of concern as an endorsement of the Government's own position, but I agree that the strength of these concerns should have been acknowledged.

  We intend to pursue our opposition to the ban. Progress is usually possible once discussions get under way in Council Working Groups. In the early discussions which have already taken place, we have left Member States and the Commission in no doubt as to our position. It is already clear that a number of States share our view on the lack of necessity for a complete ban. We are therefore actively considering the feasibility of some of the other Member States' ideas, which include a delay in the application date (which may help, but is not an ideal solution), an exemption for certain vehicles, including classic cars (which would meet our objective but which might be difficult to define) or a limit on the amount of leaded petrol used. This last solution could fit in well with our own proposal for using economic incentives.

  Overall I am encouraged that not only do a number of Member States share our concerns, but that there also appears to be some recognition that a more acceptable solution is needed. It is still too early to give you a clear indication of what the final outcome might be but I am cautiously optimistic that a solution acceptable to the UK will be reached.

13 February 1997

Letter from Lord Tordoff, Chairman of the Committee, to John Bowis, OBE, MP, Minister for Transport in London and for Road Safety

  Thank you for your letter of 13 February in reply to mine of 4 February. Your letter has now been considered by Sub-Committee B, to whom the original proposal was sifted for scrutiny.

  The Sub-Committee was pleased to note your reiteration of the Government's opposition to the proposed ban on leaded petrol by 2000. On the grounds that the Government's negotiating position, as outlined in your letter, matches its own concerns on this point, the Sub-Committee agreed to lift the scrutiny reserve. I would be grateful if you could let me know in due course whether you are successful in securing a satisfactory final outcome.

4 March 1997

Letter from Lord Geddes, Chairman of Sub-Committee B, to John Bowis, OBE, MP, Minister for Transport in London and for Road Safety

  As you know, the above proposal was cleared by means of a letter from Lord Tordoff on 4 March, following correspondence based on scrutiny by Sub-Committee B.

  It has now come to the Sub-Committee's attention that a further implication of the draft Directive on vehicle emissions would be to give car manufacturers exclusive control over the access codes to on-board diagnostic systems which are to become mandatory for new cars by the year 2000. This aspect of the draft Directive, which was not discussed in the Government's EM nor considered by the Sub-Committee during its earlier scrutiny of the proposal, has given rise to concerns among motoring organisations such as the RAC that their ability to provide a roadside repair service to motorists would be significantly restricted.

  The Sub-Committee has seen a note prepared by your Department in response to these concerns which says that the Government will "aim to ensure that all diagnostic fault codes, electronic communication protocols and connector sockets are standardised to enable interrogation by standard off-board instruments used by the repair industry". We strongly support this approach, and I would be grateful if you were able to let me know in due course what success you have in ensuring that appropriate changes to the draft Directive are made.

20 March 1997


5  Printed in Correspondence with Ministers, 5th Report, Session 1996-97, p. 24. Back

 
previous page contents next page
House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1997
Prepared 10 June 1997