Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


COMMONS AMENDMENT

32
Clause 46, page 35, leave out lines 38 and 39.

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 32.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 32.-(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

COMMONS AMENDMENT

33
Clause 50, page 40, line 21, leave out ("triable only on indictment") and insert ("to which subsection (6) below applies").

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 33. In moving Amendment No. 33, I speak to Amendments Nos. 34, 35 and 36. My noble and learned friend the Solicitor-General gave certain commitments to your Lordships on 31st March. They relate to the functions of lay staff. These amendments give effect to those commitments consistent with the recommendations of the Narey Report.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 33.--Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

COMMONS AMENDMENTS

34
Clause 50, page 40, line 24, leave out ("triable only on indictment") and insert ("to which subsection (6) below applies").
35
Page 40, line 27, at end insert--
("(6) This subsection applies to an offence if it is triable only on indictment, or is an offence--
(a) for which the accused has elected to be tried by a jury;
(b) which a magistrates' court has decided is more suitable to be so tried; or

22 Jul 1998 : Column 994


(c) in respect of which a notice of transfer has been given under section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 or section 53 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991.").
36
Page 40, line 27, at end insert--
("( ) Details of the following for any year, namely--
(a) the criteria applied by the Director in determining whether to designate persons under this section;
(b) the training undergone by persons so designated; and
(c) any general instructions given by the Director under subsection (4) above,
shall be set out in the Director's report under section 9 of this Act for that year."").

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 34, 35 and 36.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 34, 35 and 36.--(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

COMMONS AMENDMENT

37
Clause 54, page 41, leave out lines 36 and 37 and insert--
("(b) whether by means of a live television link or otherwise, he is able to see and hear the court and to be seen and heard by it.").

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House to agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 37. I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 38 and 39. In the Commons my right honourable friend Mr. Kaufman asked whether or not live television links in Clause 54 also could cover Internet links. The purpose of these amendments is to ensure that future technological developments of live audio and visual links, when all of us are long since passed from this mortal frame, are within the scope of the clause.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 37.--(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

COMMONS AMENDMENTS

38
Clause 54, page 41, line 41, leave out from ("to") to ("and") in line 42 and insert ("see and hear the court and to be seen and heard by it").
39
Page 42, line 3, leave out subsection (5).

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 38 and 39.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 38 and 38.--(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

22 Jul 1998 : Column 995

COMMONS AMENDMENT


40
Clause 56, page 43, line 6, after ("section") insert ("and section 51(2D) below").

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 40. I speak also to Amendments Nos. 41, 42, 87, 171, 172, 173 and 229. Amendment No. 40 is consequential on the new clause introduced by Amendment No. 85 which sets out the calculation process for two or more sentences. Part of it relates to extended sentences and it is therefore necessary to refer to that.

Amendments Nos. 41, 42, 173 and 229 reflect the need to ensure that all offenders given extended sentences who are recalled to a prison supervision period are treated fairly and equitably.

These amendments introduce a new Section 44A in the Criminal Justice Act 1991 and make necessary consequential amendments to the relevant provisions which will provide specifically for the re-release of offenders who are recalled during an extended sentence. It will ensure that all such offenders will be eligible for the same consideration for re-release on licence regardless of the length of their sentence.

Amendments Nos. 87, 171 and 172 ensure consistency by providing that those on extended sentences who are not re-released until the end of their extension period are subject to a period of supervision until the end of their sentence in the same way as any other offender released following recall. Nothing makes any fundamental change. They simply ensure that there is no inconsistency in the way that extended sentence prisoners are treated.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 40.--(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

COMMONS AMENDMENTS

41
Clause 56, page 43, line 30, leave out from ("above") to end of line 32.
42
After Clause 56, insert the following new clause--
Re-release of prisoners serving extended sentences

(". After section 44 of the 1991 Act there shall be inserted the following section--
"Re-release of prisoners serving extended sentences.

44A.--(1) This section applies to a prisoner serving an extended sentence within the meaning of section 55 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 who is recalled to prison under section 39(1) or (2) above.
(2) Subject to subsection (3) below, the prisoner may require the Secretary of State to refer his case to the Board at any time.
(3) Where there has been a previous reference of the prisoner's case to the Board (whether under this section or section 39(4) above), the Secretary of State shall not be required to refer the case until after the end of the period of one year beginning with the disposal of that reference.
(4) On a reference--
(a) under this section; or
(b) under section 39(4) above,

22 Jul 1998 : Column 996


the Board shall direct the prisoner's release if satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the protection of the public that he should be confined (but not otherwise).
(5) If the Board gives a direction under subsection (4) above it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to release the prisoner on licence."").

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 41 and 42.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 41 and 42.--(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

COMMONS AMENDMENT

43
Clause 58, page 44, line 35, after ("any") insert ("particular").

Lord Williams of Mostyn: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 43. I speak also to Amendments Nos. 44 to 49 and 118 to 123.

On Amendment No. 43, in some cases the treatment requirement of a drug treatment and testing order may be for a period in a residential rehabilitation unit to be followed, say, by attendance at a non-residential day programme. Amendment No. 43 therefore clarifies the court's powers.

On Amendments Nos. 44 to 46, 49, and 118 to 123, as the Bill stands such an order may be made and administered only by the court which convicted the offender. There have been discussions with Association of Chief Officers of Probation (ACOP), which is a strong supporter of the order, on what will happen if an offender lives so far from the convicting court that review is unlikely to be practical. For instance, if a person in London is convicted and given an order in Leeds the treatment arrangements must be available in London but the review hearing is before Leeds. That is an absurd waste of expenditure and therefore these amendments are to correct those possible anomalies. It means that a court acting for the area in which the offender resides may be made responsible for administering the order if the court making the order thinks fit and does not itself act for that area.

Amendments Nos. 47 and 48 are minor pre-consolidation amendments identified in consultation with the Law Commission.

Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 43.--(Lord Williams of Mostyn.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page