Select Committee on Delegated Powers and Deregulation Ninth Report


CRIME AND DISORDER BILL [HL]

Memorandum by the Home Office

Introduction

This Memorandum, which is provided by the Home Office in consultation with the Northern Ireland Office and the Scottish Office, sets out the delegated powers conferred by the Crime and Disorder Bill and indicates in each case the Parliamentary procedure, if any, which is considered appropriate.

Clause 3

Clause 3(1)(d) provides that a sex offender for the purposes of clauses 2 and 3 includes a person who has been punished outside the United Kingdom for an act which would have constituted a sexual offence had it been done in any part of the United Kingdom, provided that the act in question constituted an offence under the law in force in the country or territory where he was so punished.

Clause 3(6) states that the above proviso shall be taken to be satisfied unless the defendant serves on the prosecution a notice requiring it to prove the matter not later than a date to be prescribed by rules of court.

The proceedings in question will be in the magistrates' court: see clause 2(2). The power to make rules of court for magistrates' courts in England and Wales is set out in section 144 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980. Rules are made by the Magistrates' Courts Rules Committee described in that section. The power to make the rules is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure, see section 144(4) of the 1980 Act.

Clause 5

Subsection (2) imposes a duty on specified persons and bodies to co-operate with the responsible authorities under clause 5 in exercising the functions conferred by clause 6.

Paragraph (c) of that subsection requires every person or body of a description specified by the Secretary of State by order to co-operate as set out above.

By clause 90 the order-making power under clause 5(2)(c) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

Subsection (3) provides that the responsible authorities shall invite the participation in their exercise of the functions conferred by clause 6 of at least one person or body of each description prescribed by the Secretary of State by order.

By clause 90 the order-making power under clause 5(3) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

Clause 10

Clause 10 provides for appeals against the making of parenting orders. Subsection (6) enables the Lord Chancellor by order to make provision as to the circumstances in which appeals to the High Court against the making of a parenting order under clause 8(1)(a) (where a child safety order is made in respect of a child) may be made against decisions taken in connection with the transfer of proceedings under Schedule 11 to the Children Act 1989.

By clause 90 the order making power in clause 10(6) (which is applied by clause 13(3) for the purposes of appeals to the High Court against the making of a child safety order) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

The provision in clause 10(6) replicates that in section 94(10) of the Children Act 1989, which enables the Lord Chancellor to make similar provision by order made by statutory instrument, subject to negative resolution procedure, in relation to appeals against transfer decisions in other family proceedings under the 1989 Act. Without such provision there is no right of appeal against an order transferring family proceedings from one court to another under Schedule 11 to the 1989 Act.

Clause 29

Clause 29 imposes a duty on local authorities, in co-operation with other bodies, to provide youth justice services. Subsection (4) enables the Secretary of State by order to amend subsection (3) so as to extend, restrict or otherwise alter the definition of "youth justice services" for the time being specified in that subsection.

By clause 90, the order making power under clause 29(4) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

The definition of "youth justice services" applies for the purposes of clauses 29 to 32. Currently it includes a range of services relating to children and young persons involved in criminal investigations and proceedings and subject to community orders or supervision after release from a custodial sentence. In the light of experience, it may be necessary to add other services, or remove or alter the references to services specified in the definition. As this would amend primary legislation, and potentially increase the burden on local authorities and other bodies, the affirmative resolution procedure is considered appropriate.

Clause 32

Clause 32 establishes the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales. Subsection (5) confers certain functions on the Board. Subsection (6) enables the Secretary of State by order to amend subsection (5) so as to extend, restrict or otherwise alter any of the functions for the time being specified in that subsection or provide that any function of his in relation to the youth justice system is exercisable concurrently with the Board.

By clause 90, the order-making power in clause 32(6) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

The functions specified in clause 32(5) cover monitoring and advising the Secretary of State on the operation of the youth justice system, obtaining and publishing information for that purpose and promoting good practice. In the light of experience it may prove necessary to amend the functions or to assign to the Board a role in relation to an existing function of the Secretary of State. As this would involve amendment of primary legislation and might increase the expenses of the Board or the burden on local authorities and other bodies, the affirmative resolution procedure is considered appropriate.

Clause 34

Subsection (1) amends section 22(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 so as to enable regulations as to time limits in criminal proceedings made by the Secretary of State under that section to apply only in relation to proceedings of or against persons of specified classes or descriptions, and to make different provision with respect to such proceedings, as well as to apply only, or to make different provision in respect of, proceedings instituted in specified areas.

By section 29 of the 1985 Act, the power to make such regulations is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 35

Clause 35 inserts a new section 22A in the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. Subsection (1) of section 22A enables the Secretary of State to make regulations providing for additional time limits for persons under 18, in respect of the initial stage (from arrest to the date fixed for the person's first court appearance) and of the period from conviction to sentence.

By section 29 of the 1985 Act, the power to make regulations under section 22A(1) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 40

Clause 40 provides for certain powers of magistrates' courts to be exercisable by single justices. Subsection (2) extends the power in section 144 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 to enable rules made under that section by the Lord Chancellor to provide that any of the things authorised by subsection (1) of clause 40 to be done by a single justice for any area may, subject to restrictions specified in the rules, be done by a justices' clerk for that area and to make different provision for different areas. Subjection (3) requires the Lord Chancellor to consult the justices and justices' clerks for any area in relation to which he proposes to make rules by virtue of subsection (2).

By section 144(4) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, the power to make rules under that section (including rules made by virtue of clause 40(2)) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 43 and Schedule 2

Clause 43 makes provision supplementing clause 42 (indictable-only offences). Subsection (6) introduces Schedule 2. Paragraph 1 of Schedule 2 requires the Attorney General to make regulations providing for the service on the defendant of copies of documents containing evidence on which any charge against him for which he is sent for trial under clause 42 is based.

By clause 90 the power to make regulations under paragraph 1 is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

The provision in paragraph 1 is similar to provisions in the Criminal Justice Acts 1987 and 1991 relating to transfer for trial of certain cases of fraud or cases involving children. The procedure applicable is also similar.

Paragraph 2(7) enables Crown Court rules to make provision for the purposes of the paragraph and, in particular, as to the time when anything is to be done or as to the contents of notices and persons on whom they are to be served or as to the manner of submitting evidence. By section 84(8) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 Crown Court Rules are made by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 46

By subsection (4)(b) the length of an extension period in the term of an extended sentence under clause 46 should not exceed five years in the case of a violent offence.

By subsection (7), the Secretary of State may amend that provision by substituting a different period, not exceeding ten years, for the period for the time being specified in subsection (4)(b).

By clause 90 the order making power under clause 46(7) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

Clause 48

By subsection (2) the court may make a drug treatment and testing order which has effect for a period specified in the order of not less than six months nor more than three years.

Subsection (7) confers power on the Secretary of State to substitute different minimum and maximum periods under subsection (2) by order.

By clause 90 the order making power under clause 48(7) is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provisions.

Clause 60

Clause 60 provides for a new custodial sentence for children and young persons, the detention and training order, the making of which is subject to specified conditions. Subsection (2)(b) imposes additional conditions for making a detention and training order in the case of persons under the age of 12 at the time of conviction. The condition in paragraph (b)(ii) is that the offence was committed on or after a date appointed by the Secretary of State by order.

By clause 90, the order-making power in clause 50(2)(b)(ii) is exercisable by statutory instrument and there is power to make transitional provision. It is not subject to any Parliamentary procedure, because it is a power to appoint a day for the purposes of clause 60(2) and is similar to a commencement order.

Clause 63

Clause 63 makes provision for the period of supervision of an offender subject to a detention and training order. Subsection (1) provides that, subject to subsection (2), the period begins on the date of release and ends when the term of the order ends. By subsection (2) the Secretary of State may by order provide that the period is to end at such point during the term of a detention and training order as may be specified in the order under that subsection.

By clause 90 the order-making power is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. There is power to make transitional provision.

The power to shorten the period of post-release supervision (which would otherwise, in most cases, be half the term of the detention and training order) is considered necessary to take account of experience or changing circumstances. The affirmative resolution procedure is considered appropriate as the order would amend primary legislation and have an impact on the length of supervision under the detention and training order.

Clause 70 - Extended sentences for sex and violent offenders

Provision

Subsection (6) of the new Section 210A of Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 inserted by Clause 70(1) of the Crime and Disorder Bill gives the Secretary of State an order making power.

Purpose

Clause 70 (1) introduces a new Section 210A to the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 to enable courts to pass extended sentences on violent or sexual offenders where it is necessary to do so to protect the public from serious harm from the offender on his release from custody. The maximum duration of extended supervision provided by S. 210A(3) is 10 years for a sexual offence (S. 210A(3)(a)) and 5 years for a violent offence (S. 210A(3)(b)).

S. 210A(6) gives the Secretary of State delegated powers to substitute a different time period of up to 10 years for violent offences ((S. 210A(3)(b)) and to make any necessary transitional arrangements. S 210A(7) provides for this power to be exercised by statutory instrument subject to affirmative resolution.

Reason for delegated legislation

The principle behind the extended supervision provisions is that in some cases sexual and violent offenders should be supervised for much longer periods following release than the law allows at present.

It is recognised that violent offenders' behaviour patterns are less entrenched and more likely to improve over time as they mature than sex offenders. It is considered unlikely, therefore, that a 10 year maximum period of extended supervision in addition to their existing period on licence would be justified in the same way as for sex offenders. For this reason it is intended that the maximum period for violent offenders should be set at 5 years, but with the option to increase this to 10 years should it prove necessary to do so in the light of experience. To achieve this flexibility, the Bill proposes that the Secretary of State should have the power to amend the period to a maximum of 10 years.

Procedure

Section 210A(7) provides that the order making power in subsection (6) of clause 70 shall be exercisable by statutory instrument, including a power to make whatever transitional arrangements as appear necessary in connection with an amendment to subsection (6), and will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. This is appropriate because any change made by such an order would affect the period for which offenders may be subject to post-release supervision.

Clause 72 - Drug Treatment and Testing Orders

Provision

Clause 72 inserts a new section 234B into the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. The new section 234B(6) contains a power for the Secretary of State, by order, to amend subsection 2(a) of section 234B.

Purpose

The purpose of the order making power in new section 234B(6)(a) is to change the minimum and maximum periods during which our Drug Treatment and Testing Order could be in force. It also provides for transitional arrangements.

Reason for delegated legislation

This is a common provision in legislation dealing with the length of non-custodial criminal disposal orders. The length of these orders is fixed according to current needs but the power to amend by order allows some flexibility in the event of changing circumstances without recourse to primary legislation.

Procedure

The order is exercisable by statutory instrument subject to affirmative resolution of each House of Parliament. This is in recognition that changes to the length of the sentence would affect individual liberty.

Clause 80

Clause 80 amends section 23 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1969. In subsection (5) of that section (which enables a court, subject to specified conditions, to remand a child or young person to local authority accommodation with a requirement that he be placed and kept in secure accommodation) clause 80(1) substitutes for the condition that the person must have reached the age of fifteen, a condition that he must be a child of at least 12, or a young person, who is in either case of a prescribed description. Clause 80(2) inserts in subsection (12) of section 23 a definition of "prescribed description", that is to say, a description prescribed by reference to age or sex or both by an order of the Secretary of State.

By section 69 of the 1969 Act the order-making power in section 23(12) of that Act, as inserted by clause 80(2), is exercisable by statutory instrument and subject to the negative resolution procedure. There is power to make different provision for different circumstances and to make incidental or supplemental provisions.

The order-making power is considered necessary to enable the security requirement provisions in section 23 (which are not yet in force) to be implemented in stages. It replaces provision in section 20 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (which is repealed by clause 80(3)), but enables implementation to be more flexible.

Clause 82

Clause 82 inserts a new section 34A into the Criminal Justice Act 1991. By subsection (4) of that section, the requisite period to be served by a prisoner before he becomes eligible for release on licence under that section is defined. It provides for a period of 60 days less than half of the term of the sentence in question, and shorter periods for sentences of between three and eight months.

Subsection (5) confers powers on the Secretary of State to amend by order the definition of the requisite period under subsection (4). This is to enable the Secretary of State to alter the period in the light of experience of the home detention curfew scheme, without the need for amending primary legislation. For example, a shorter or longer period on home detention curfew could be shown to have a beneficial effect on recidivism. Subsection (4) also confers powers to make transitional provisions in such an order.

The order making power is exercisable by statutory instrument and, by subsection (5), is subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.

Clause 83

Subsection (1) introduces a new section 37A into the Criminal Justice Act 1991. Subsection (4) provides that the curfew condition included in a licence under section 34A of that Act shall include provision for making a person responsible for monitoring the whereabouts of the licensee during the periods specified in the condition.

Subsection (4) further provides that the person who is made so responsible shall be of a description specified in an order made by the Secretary of State.

The order making power is exercisable by statutory instrument and includes power to make different provision for different cases or classes of case. As with the similar power to specify a responsible person in respect of a curfew order under section 12 of the 1991 Act, the power is not subject to Parliamentary procedure. Compare section 30(2) of that Act.

Clause 88

Subsection (3) inserts a new subsection (7A) into section 9 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997. This is consequential upon the repeal by clause 88(2) of section 27(5) of that Act which provided inter alia that rules made under section 9(4)(a) may make such incidental, supplemental and consequential provisions as may appear to the Secretary of State to be necessary or expedient. The new subsection (7A) simply replicates the repealed provision in so far as it applies to rules made under section 9(4)(a).

(Section 9(4)(a) enables the Secretary of State to make rules to qualify the requirement in subsection (3) of that section upon a sentencing court to direct that the number of days for which the offender was remanded in custody in connection with the offence or a related offence shall count as time served by him as part of the sentence. The qualifying power in subsection (4)(a) applies in the case of a remand in custody which is concurrent with a sentence of imprisonment or in the case of sentences of imprisonment for consecutive or concurrent terms. The power is made subject to the affirmative resolution procedure by section 9(7)).

Clause 91

Clause 91 contains transitory provisions in relation to sections 1 and 4 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, which are repealed by clause 60(7). Subsection (1) enables the Secretary of State by order to provide that in relation to any time before the commencement of clause 60 a court shall not make a secure training order under section 1, or an order that a person be detained in a secure training centre for breach of supervision requirements under section 4, of the 1994 Act unless it has been notified by the Secretary of State that accommodation at a secure training centre, or at local authority secure accommodation, is immediately available for the offender and the notice has not been withdrawn.

Subsection (2) provides that an order under clause 91 may also provide that sections 2 and 4 of the 1994 Act shall have effect, in relation to any time before the commencement of clause 60, subject to specified modifications. By clause 90, the order-making power in clause 91 is exercisable by statutory instrument and may contain transitional provisions. It is not subject to any Parliamentary procedure because the power is transitory, pending commencement of clause 60 and the introduction of the detention and training order which will replace secure training orders.

The order-making power is considered necessary to enable the Secretary of State to control demand for places in secure training centres. It is anticipated that when the power under section 1 of the 1994 Act to make secure training orders is brought into force only one secure training centre will be available, with 40 places. The power to restrict the making of a secure training order according to availability of places will only be exercised if demand exceeds supply. The modifications specified in clause 91(2) limit the power of courts to commit an offender subject to a secure training order to accommodation other than a secure training centre so that only secure local authority accommodation can be specified in the warrant of commitment if no place in a secure training centre is immediately available.

Clause 93

Clause 93 provides that an Order in Council under paragraph 1(1)(b) of Schedule 1 to the Northern Ireland Act 1974 which is made only for purposes corresponding to those of clauses 2 to 4 (sex offender orders), 27 (abolition of presumption of doli incapax), 38(2) (youth court adjournments), 45 (live TV links at remand hearings), 48 to 51 (drug treatment and testing orders) and 69 (interpretation) is to be subject to negative resolution procedure instead of affirmative resolution procedure.

Clause 96

Subsection (2) provides that, with the exception of clause 96 itself, the Bill is to come into force on such day as the Secretary of State may by order appoint; different days may be appointed for different purposes or areas.

By clause 90, the order-making power in clause 96(2) is exercisable by statutory instrument and transitional provision may be made. The power is not subject to any Parliamentary procedure, in common with most commencement order-making powers.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1997
Prepared 19 December 1997