Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Stoddart of Swindon asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Falconer of Thoroton: At 1 April 1998 the Home Civil Service and the Diplomatic Service employed 220,000 male and 231,000 female permanent non-industrial staff. These figures are on a headcount basis, i.e. part-time staff count as one person.
Figures for the Northern Ireland Civil Service, legally a distinct and separate Civil Service for which personnel statistics are compiled by the Department of Finance and Personnel in Belfast, are 14,000 male and 13,000 female.
Figures for the Forestry Commission, which is also legally a distinct Civil Service, are 1,000 male and 1,000 female.
These figures do not include some 17,000 casual non-industrial staff for whom no gender breakdown is available. They do, however, include some 6,000 staff employed overseas.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office (Lord Dubs): The attached table shows the number of persons proceeded against for offences of violence against the person and the number found guilty for the period 1994 to 31 March 1998 (the most recent date available):
Scheduled and non-scheduled offences | Scheduled offences | |||||
Year | Persons proceeded against | Persons found guilty | Persons proceeded against | Persons found guilty | ||
1994 | 2,078 | 1,498 | 134 | 117 | ||
1995 | 2,279 | 1,685 | 148 | 137 | ||
1996 | 2,177 | 1,597 | 33 | 27 | ||
1997 | 2,049 | 1,594 | 42 | 36 | ||
1998 to 31 March | 489 | 368 | 9 | 8 |
Note:
1. The computerised records system does not record the number of persons charged. To provide this information would require a large manual check of records across the Province. The table therefore shows the number of persons proceeded against and found guilty for both scheduled and non-scheduled offences.
2. This table records the number of persons convicted as distinct from the number of offences; that is, a person may have been charged with more than one such offence but is counted only once.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Dubs: The Chief Constable has opened an investigation into the allegations of assault on Mr. Adams and referred the case to the Independent Commission for Police Complaints to supervise the investigation. The investigation is being conducted by a team of officers from the Strathclyde Police Force. At the end of the investigation, which is at an advanced stage, the ICPC will issue a statement as to whether the investigation was or was not conducted to its satisfaction. It will then be for the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland to consider whether there is any evidence to warrant criminal proceedings. Once any criminal aspects have been dealt with the matter of whether there are any grounds for disciplinary proceedings will have to be dealt with. This is not an inquiry but a police investigation, and the investigators' report will not be published.
Lord Jopling asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean): The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is not in a position to assess the hypothetical risk of individual British nationals becoming the subject of extradition proceedings, which could be served in the United Kingdom as well as overseas.
Lord McNair asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: We do not keep records of such punishments.
Lord McNair asked Her Majesty's Government:
What was the outcome of the inquiry ordered by the Independent Commission for Police Complaints into the case of Mr. David Adams in Northern Ireland; if there is no such outcome so far, when they expect to receive a report; and whether this will be published.[HL150]
Whether they are giving advice to either current or former high profile United Kingdom citizens who may be contemplating overseas travel concerning the possibility of extradition proceedings being taken against them while they are overseas.[HL167]
Whether they have any figures on the carrying out of hudud punishments in the Sudan in the 10 years prior to 1989 compared with the past nine years.[HL174]
Further to the Written Answer by the Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 18 November (WA 169), what role the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has in negotiations with the Government of the Sudan on technical assistance for improving the teaching and observance of human rights in Sudan.[HL175]
14 Dec 1998 : Column WA134
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is concerned only with the care and maintenance of refugees. It does not provide wider technical assistance.
Lord McNair asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: We have offered funding to raise human rights awareness in Sudan to an NGO working with the Sudanese Ministry of Justice. The NGO has not yet taken up our offer.
Lord McNair asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: We have maintained a dialogue with the Government of Sudan on various aspects of human rights. We have not been asked for funding assistance.
Lord McNair asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: We have received sketchy reports of this incident. We understand that it was an internal tribal dispute which has since ended. We are in contact with the Sudanese Embassy to seek further information.
Lord McNair asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: We have discussed with the United Nations the killings of WFP and Sudanese Red Crescent personnel last June. The victims were part of a convoy delivering relief food in South Kordofan, close to the Nuba Mountains, and were not members of an Operation Lifeline Sudan assessment mission. Such a mission to the Nuba Mountains has yet to take place owing to the continued refusal by the Sudanese authorities to agree to it. The UN has not made public, nor have we asked for a copy of, the findings of what was an internal investigation into the killings.
Baroness David asked Her Majesty's Government:
(a) in schools;
(b) in residential institutions for children;
(c) in the penal system, either as a sentence of the courts or as a punishment in penal institutions;
is permitted in the following Overseas Territories of the United Kingdom: Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn, St. Helena, and the Turks and Caicos Islands.[HL199]
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: The available information on corporal punishment of children in the Overseas Territories is as follows:
Corporal punishment of children permitted:
In schools In residential institutions for children In the penal or judicial system
Anguilla yes no such institutions no
Bermuda yes yes no
British Virgin Islands yes no legislation yes
Cayman Islands yes not practised no
Falkland Islands yes but never practised no such institutions no
Gibraltar no legislation but never practised no legislation but never practised no
Montserrat yes no such institutions no
Pitcairn yes no such institutions no
St. Helena no no no
Turks and Caicos Islands yes no such institutions no
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page