Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Social Security (Baroness Hollis of Heigham): The information is not available.
Lord Selkirk of Douglas asked Her Majesty's Government:
What is the total number of Scottish public sector houses which have been sold to sitting tenants since 1970; and what percentage this represents of Scotland's public sector housing stock; and[HL632]
What is the percentage of home ownership as a percentage of all housing in Scotland; and[HL633]
What is the total number of housing association dwellings in Scotland.[HL634]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Scottish Office (Lord Sewel): Local authorities, Scottish Homes (formerly the Scottish Special Housing Association) and the New Town Development Corporations notified the Scottish Office of the sale of 423,860 houses in their ownership between January 1973 and March 1998. Information prior to 1973 is not held centrally.
Information on the status of the purchaser is not available prior to April 1979. Of the 418,542 house sales which were notified to the Scottish Office between April 1979 and March 1998, 356,643 were sales to sitting tenants, representing 35 per cent. of the public sector housing stock at September 1978.
The Scottish Office Statistical Bulletin (Housing Series HSG/1998/7) contains an estimate of the stock of dwellings by tenure. The most recent estimate is that 60.2 per cent. of dwellings were owner occupied at 31 December 1997.
According to Scottish Homes' Annual Report for 1997-98 on Scottish Housing Association Statistics, there were 117,937 housing association dwellings in Scotland at 31 March 1998.
Lord Mackay of Drumadoon asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Sewel: The latest position concerning the report of this public inquiry is that Part 1 of the report was circulated last year to parties, at their request, so that they could consider the accuracy of the record of their evidence. A number of representations was made and adjustments were circulated. These have resulted in counter-representations on the proposed adjustments to Part 1, and the former Chief Reporter is considering whether any final adjustments are necessary. It is expected that some will be required and these will be circulated shortly. Parties must then be allowed a further period of 14 days in which to comment. Thereafter, Part 2 of the report, comprising the Reporter's reasoning and recommendation, has to be completed before the report is submitted for the Secretary of State's consideration. At this stage it is not possible to indicate when the report will be submitted but it is hoped that the former Chief Reporter will have completed her consideration of the case by the end of March.
Lord Mackay of Drumadoon asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Lord Chancellor (Lord Irvine of Lairg): Bills are being drafted to consolidate legislation on the armed forces (United Kingdom), sentencing (England and Wales), criminal appeals (England and Wales) and salmon (Scotland). I am unable to say yet whether any of the Bills will be introduced this Session.
Lord Wallace of Saltaire asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Lord Donoughue): Fisheries enforcement in the waters around the Channel
Islands is undertaken and funded by the relevant Island Authorities with occasional assistance from the Royal Navy's Fishery Protection Squadron on task to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. In 1997 and 1998 Royal Navy vessels spent some 55 patrol days in these waters at an approximate cost of £290,000 to the Ministry.
Lord Howie of Troon asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (Lord Whitty): The developer of Victoria House has re-entered the competition to provide a home for the Greater London Authority. We expect to announce a decision on how the Government will proceed in the near future.
Lord Howie of Troon asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Whitty: We have chosen a developer-led design and build competition as we needed to find a site as well as a building for the Greater London Authority. This exercise has produced two excellent locations and outstanding designs from two of Britain's leading architects.
Lord Monkswell asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Whitty: The number of fatal injuries in the construction industry and the kind of accident reported to the Health and Safety Executive and local authorities is set out in the table below.
Kind of Accident | 1993-94 | 1994-95 | 1995-96 | 1996-97 | (1)1997-98 |
Contact with moving machinery or material being machined | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Struck by moving inc. flying/falling object | 5 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 12 |
Struck by moving vehicle | 10 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 6 |
Strike against something fixed or stationary | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Injured whilst handling, lifting or carrying | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Slip, trip or fall on same level | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Fall from a height: | |||||
Up to and including 2 metres | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Over 2 metres | 47 | 42 | 29 | 46 | 39 |
Height not stated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Total falls from a height | 49 | 43 | 31 | 50 | 45 |
Trapped by something collapsing or overturning | 19 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 4 |
Drowning or asphyxiation | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Exposure to or contact with harmful substance | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Exposure to fire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exposure to an explosion | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Contact with electricity or an electrical discharge | 7 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
Injured by an animal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Injuries caused by assault or violence | N/R | N/R | N/R | 0 | 0 |
Other kind of accident | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Injuries not classified by kind | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Total | 94 | 86 | 82 | 93 | 80 |
N/R = Not reportable under RIDDOR 85.
(1) Provisional.
The figures for 1996-97 and 1997-98 are published in the Health and Safety Commission's publication Health and Safety Statistics 1997-98, a copy of which is in the Library of the House of Lords.
Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Whitty: The statistics held by Railtrack plc about the bridges they own cover the nine years from January 1990 to January 1999. They record that during this period there were over 8,500 incidents of high road vehicles striking bridges. The trend has been continually upward, with some 1,300 incidents being reported in 1998.
Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Whitty: We are advised that:
(a) Owners of railway bridges are entitled to claim compensation for the cost of repairing damage to their bridges from the owner or driver of a vehicle which has damaged it; and
(b) Railtrack plc is entitled to claim compensation for the cost of compensation payments made to train operators for disruption to their services from the owners or drivers of vehicles only when the vehicle causes actual damage to the bridge. Where train services are disrupted as a precautionary measure and no damage is identified, the costs are not recoverable.
How many incidents have been reported in the last 10 years involving high road vehicles hitting railway bridges.[HL714]
Whether the owner of a railway bridge is entitled to seek compensation from the owner or driver of a lorry which has damaged it, in respect of:
(a) the cost of repairing the damage to the bridge; and
(b) the cost of compensation paid by Railtrack to train operators whose services were delayed or cancelled.[HL715]
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page