|Previous Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|
Lord Bassam of Brighton: We have no records of any such individual cases. However, circumstances have arisen, as I have explained separately, where discrimination has been needed to deal with a particular situation.
What arrangements they have made with ministerial approval under Section 41(2)(a) of the Race Relations Act 1976 since the entry into force of that Act; and [HL347]
What conditions, if any, have been imposed by a Minister of the Crown under Section 41(2)(b) of the Race Relations Act 1976 since the entry into force of that Act.[HL348]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: Section 41(1) of the Race Relations Act 1976 provides that acts are not unlawful under the Act if they are required to be done by an enactment, or in order to comply with a condition or requirement imposed by a Minister by virtue of an enactment.
Section 41(2)(a) and 41(2)(b) of the Race Relations Act 1976 provide that acts that discriminate on the basis of nationality, place of ordinary residence, or length of residence or presence in or outside the United Kingdom or an area within the United Kingdom, are not unlawful under the Act if they are required to be done in pursuance of arrangements made by, or with the approval of, or for the time being approved by, a Minister of the Crown; or to comply with any condition imposed by a Minister of the Crown.
Records of specific acts taken that are acts of racial discrimination but which are not unlawful because they fall within the exemptions in Section 41(1) and 41(2) are not kept centrally. But examples would include acts done under statutory authority that discriminate on the basis of residence status--for example, in relation to the charging of fees for attendance at universities, entitlement to education awards, or entitlement to free National Health Service hospital treatment.
Lord Bassam of Brighton: Section 42 of the Race Relations Act 1976 provides that acts are not unlawful under the Act if they are done for the purpose of safeguarding national security. Records of specific acts taken under this exemption are not kept centrally.
In respect of which of the "immigration and nationality functions" discrimination on the grounds of ethnic or national origins has been practised during the past three years.[HL330]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: Some discrimination on the grounds of national or ethnic origin is necessary in any immigration and asylum system. For example, an asylum claim will often rest on the treatment given in the country of origin to a particular national or ethnic group, so that discrimination in favour of individuals from such groups will be required in order to take fair decisions in accordance with obligations under international law. It may also be necessary, in order to manage the process effectively in the interests of all applicants, to give priority from time to time to particular national or ethnic groups, as was done, for example, in dealing with the cases of evacuees from Kosovo during the recent conflict and, at other times, to applicants from certain Eastern European countries making unfounded claims in large numbers.
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The texts of the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women do not define, prohibit or explicitly refer to unjustifiable indirect discrimination. The case-law is sparse and open to interpretation. However, taken with relevant General Comments of the enforcement bodies, there are some suggestions that the concept of non-discrimination in these instruments may, to some extent, include some forms of unjustifiable indirect discrimination.
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The Race Relations (Amendment) Bill's provisions are for reserved purposes, although some provisions make incidental and consequential changes in devolved areas of law. The Scottish Executive has been consulted and its views sought on the Bill's impact upon areas of devolved competence.
Why the reply given to the Chilean Government in reponse to their representations for the release of General Pinochet cannot be published in this country when it has been published in Chile.[HL319]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: I understand that the Chilean press has carried reports concerning the contents of this correspondence. Those contents are confidential to the Chilean Government and Senator Pinochet. In the circumstances it would not be appropriate to comment on the accuracy of any press reporting on that correspondence.
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page