Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 1987: Charges

Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord Bassam of Brighton): The information requested is currently unavailable and could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost.

9 Nov 2000 : Column WA174

Human Rights: Protocol No. 12

Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Further to the Written Answer by Lord Bassam of Brighton on 23 October (WA 14), whether there is any basis in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights or in any other international or comparative jurisprudence to support the Government's concern that the European Court of Human Rights might interpret Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights in a way which did not allow objective and reasonably justified distinctions; and, if not, what is the basis for the Government's concern.[HL4430]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The current case law of the European Court of Human Rights suggests that objective and reasonably justified distinctions do not constitute discrimination for the purposes of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. But the Court's interpretation of the Convention evolves and it is not bound by previous judgments. It was for this reason that we sought, though without success, for this principle to be included in the text of the Protocol itself.

Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Further to the Written Answer by Lord Bassam of Brighton on 23 October (WA 14), whether there is any basis in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights or in any other international or comparative jurisprudence to suggest that the European Court of Human Rights would not interpret Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights in a way which enabled contracting states to take positive and proportionate measures to overcome the effects of past discrimination and to promote the effective enjoyment of equality of treatment without discrimination; and, if not, what is the basis for the Government's concern.[HL4431]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: It may be that the European Court of Human Rights would hold that positive and proportionate action to overcome the effects of past discrimination did not constitute discrimination for the purposes of Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights. We consider, however, and have argued without success, that there should be some specific provision to this effect in the text of the Protocol itself.

Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Further to the Written Answer by Lord Bassam of Brighton on 23 October (WA 13), which human rights and which international agreement the Government have in mind in relation to their concern that the European Court of Human Rights might hold (under Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights) that such rights are protected against discrimination under Protocol 12. [HL4429]

9 Nov 2000 : Column WA175

Lord Bassam of Brighton: There are a number of provisions in international agreements--for instance, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights--which it has not been thought appropriate to incorporate into the law of the United Kingdom because, for example, they are aspirational. There is nothing in the text of Protocol 12, or even in its preamble, to exclude these rights from the coverage of the Protocol.

Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam of Brighton on 25 October (WA 45), whether they signed the Political Declaration adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 13 October at the conclusion of the European Conference Against Racism; and, if so, what are their reasons for being willing to adopt this statement while being unwilling to sign and ratify Protocol No. 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights on behalf of the United Kingdom. [HL4461]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The Government have signed the Political Declaration. They thus committed themselves to considering signature and ratification, as soon as possible and without reservations, of relevant universal and European human rights instruments for which such action had not yet been taken. The Government did not sign Protocol 12 when it was opened for signature in Rome on 4 November and have no present plans to do so, but they have not indefinitely ruled out signature and ratification. They will keep their position under consideration in the light of the interpretation of the Protocol by the European Court of Human Rights.

Northern Ireland: Immigration Detention

Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:

    When they expect to publish the review of the use of immigration detention in Northern Ireland, promised during the proceedings on the Immigration and Asylum Bill.[HL4449]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The review to which the noble Lord refers involves consideration by immigration officials in conjunction with colleagues in the Northern Ireland Prison Service as to the most appropriate place for the detention of Immigration Act Detainees who are encountered there. Everyone agrees that the current arrangements, where male detainees are accommodated with convicted prisoners are far from ideal.

The review has needed to take into account the needs of the detainees; their friends, relatives and representatives but the solution must also be cost

9 Nov 2000 : Column WA176

effective. We will also consider the views expressed by the Northern Ireland Law Centre in its report on the detention of asylum seekers in Northern Ireland. Various meetings and discussions have taken place but there is still more work to do. We are expecting to reach a conclusion by the end of this year. However, the Government do not see any need to publish the details of the deliberations, but we will, of course, make known the intended course of action when this has been decided.

Immigration Detainees: Prison Service Accommodation

Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:

    What are the terms of the agreements between the Immigration and Nationality Department and the Prison Services in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland respectively under which the Prison Services make accommodation available within their estate for Immigration Act detainees; and what is the current number of places being provided in prisons in each jurisdiction for this purpose.[HL4447]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: In 1994 Ministers agreed that the Prison Service would provide approximately 500 places for immigration detainees to be held in prisons. No formal contract or service level agreement was made at the time.

In 2000, in pursuit of the Government's long-term strategy to rationalise and reduce the use of prisons for Immigration Act detainees, the Prison Service and the Immigration and Nationality Department agreed a package to provide immigration detention places separate from convicted prisoners; closer to meeting geographical needs and, in a small number of locations, better to meet the needs of immigration detainees. This included the closure of HMP Aldington and the transfer of the site for development as an Immigration Detention Centre in Spring 2002, and the opening in July 2000 of Lindholme Detainee Centre run by the Prison Service under a four-year service level agreement.

The current number of places being provided by the Prison Service in England and Wales is 112 in Lindholme, 198 in Rochester and 150 in Haslar, and a small number of places in mainstream prisons which varies from day to day between 70 and 100. In Scotland, 60 places are available at HMP Greenock and in Northern Ireland a small number of places, rarely in excess of seven, at HMPs Magilligan and Maghaberry.

The Prison Service will soon be making a further 500 places available to the Immigration Service for a period of about one year to support the programme of removals from the United Kingdom, until the new Immigration Service detention centres come on stream during 2001. The location of these further Prison Service places has yet to be determined.

9 Nov 2000 : Column WA177

Major Road Schemes

Baroness Scott of Needham Market asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they will list all the major road schemes costing over £5 million included in the full Local Transport Plans submitted by local authorities; and whether they will place copies of the Appraisal Summary Tables for these, where submitted, in the Library of the House; and[HL4459]

    Whether they will list all major road schemes by each local authority which cost over £5 million and which were submitted to the Government as supplementary bids to the full Local Transport Plan.[HL4460]

The Minister of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (Lord Macdonald of Tradeston): A total of 129 proposals for new major transport schemes were contained in the full Local Transport Plans submitted by local authorities in July this year. These include proposals for road, public transport, light rail and heavy rail schemes. A further 10 road schemes were submitted as supplementary bids in response to the opportunity that we extended to authorities to supply additional information in the light of the 10-Year Plan. The table shows all the schemes which are either road schemes or contain a major road element. Those which came forward as supplementary bids are shown in italics. Copies of the Appraisal Summary Tables for these schemes, where they have been provided, will be placed in the Library of the House.

AuthorityScheme
BarnsleyCudworth Bypass
BirminghamNorthfield Regeneration Scheme
Selly Oak Access Road
BristolA4 Bath Road--Callington Road Link
BuckinghamshireA418 Route Improvements (Wing Bypass)
CornwallA39 Camelford Bypass
CheshireA500-A534 Link Crewe
A34 Alderley Edge Environmental Bypass
CumbriaCarlisle Northern Development Route
DarlingtonEastern Transport Corridor
DerbyshireMarkham Employment Growth Zone
A6096 Ilkeston Awsworth Link
DevonBarnstaple Western Bypass
DorsetWeymouth Relief Road
DurhamA688 Wheatley Hill to Bowburn Link
A167 Chilton Bypass
East Durham Link Road
A689 Sedgefield to Wynard Improvement
East SussexNewhaven Port Access Road
EssexCanvey Island Integrated Transport Project--Roscommon Way
GloucestershireEastern Spine Road
KentEast Kent Access Phase 1
East Kent Access Phase 2
LancashireM6 Heysham Link Road
LeedsEast Leeds Link Road
Inner Ring Road Stage 7
LeicestershireEarl Shilton Bypass
A607 Rearsby Bypass
LincolnshireA52 Grantham East-West Improvement
A158/C541 Coastal Access Improvement
A1073 Spalding to Eye Improvement
Liverpool CityHall Lane Area Improvement Scheme
LutonEast Luton Corridor (South)
MedwayA228 Main Rd to Ropers Lane (Phase 1)
A228 Ropers Lane to Isle of Grain (Phase 2)
MiddlesbroughEast Middlesbrough Transport Corridor
Milton KeynesBletchley Link
NorfolkNar Ouse Regeneration Project
Great Yarmouth A47/A149 Link
NewcastleNew Tyne Crossing
Scotswood Road Improvement
North TynesideA1056 Northern Gateway Stage 2
A1056 Northern Gateway Stage 3
PoolePoole Bridge Regeneration Initiative
ReadingA33 Interchanges
RotherhamA631 West Bawtry Road Improvement
RutlandOakham Bypass
SalfordA57 Cadishead Way
SandwellCradley Heath Town Centre Strategy
Owen Street Level Crossing Relief Road
SheffieldInner Relief Road--Stages 2 & 3
SomersetNorth West Taunton Package
StaffordshireBiddulph Inner Bypass
Rugeley Bypass
Stoke-on-TrentHanley Bentilee Link
City Centre Link
SuffolkSouth Lowestoft Relief Road
A134 Sudbury Western Bypass
SunderlandSouthern Radial Route
Central Route
Hetton Bypass
Doxford Park-Ryhope Link Road
SurreyKiln Lane Link, Epsom
TamesideThe Glossop Spur
ThurrockWest Thurrock Regeneration Ring Road
WakefieldHemsworth--A1 Link Road
Glasshoughton Coalfields Link Road
WalsallTown Centre Transport Package
WarringtonBridgefoot Environmental Enhancement
Manchester Ship Canal Crossing Facilities
WarwickshireBarford Bypass
Rugby Western Relief Road
West SussexA24 Horsham--Capel Improvement
WiganIntegrated Transport Scheme
WiltshireSalisbury Transport Study Package
Western Wiltshire Sustainable Transport Package
WorcestershireWyre Piddle Bypass

9 Nov 2000 : Column WA178



   Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page