Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


3 Apr 2001 : Column WA105

Written Answers

Tuesday, 3rd April 2001.

Police, Probation, Crown Prosecution and Prison Services Funding

Baroness Stern asked Her Majesty's Government:

3 Apr 2001 : Column WA107

    What is the planned increase in funding (a) next year and (b) over the next three years for police, probation services, Crown Prosecution Service and Prison Service respectively, expressed in both absolute and percentage terms.[HL1364]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord Bassam of Brighton): Planned increases in funding for the period 2001-02 to 2003-04 are given in the table:

3 Apr 2001 : Column WA105

2001-022001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Provision £000sIncrease £000sIncrease %Increase £000sIncrease %Increase £000sIncrease %
Police7,718,000777,00010.11,292,00016.71,575,00020.4
Probation Services519,000121,00023.3162,00031.2194,00037.4
Crown Prosecution Service314,00071,30022.780,60025.692,60029.4
Prison Service2,401,000117,0004.9238,0009.9308,00012.8

Figures show the increase on 2001-01 provision in both absolute and percentage terms based on latest provisional allocations. (The percentage increase compares each year with 2000-01.)


Prison Overcrowding

Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Further to the Written Answer by Lord Bassam of Brighton on 16 March (WA 115), how many prisoners are currently held in excess of the in-use certified normal accommodation; and in which prisons are these conditions obtaining. [HL1396]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The number of prisoners held in excess of the in-use certified normal accommodation at the end of February 2001 was 4,362. The prisons concerned are listed in the table. These data are provisional but are not expected to alter significantly.

Prison nameIn Use CNAPopulationDifferencePercentage overcrowded
Altcourse61479918530.1%
Aylesbury34835351.4%
Bedford352368164.5%
Belmarsh84385070.8%
Birmingham71092521530.3%
Blakenhurst64784619930.8%
Bristol31454523173.6%
Brixton65175510416.0%
Buckley Hall350360102.9%
Bullingdon767836699.0%
Canterbury1962545829.6%
Cardiff40354414135.0%
Cookham Wood1201472722.5%
Doncaster7711,09132041.5%
Dorchester1722194727.3%
Downview32233082.5%
Durham670703334.9%
Eastwood Park29530272.4%
Elmley76386410113.2%
Everthorpe438456184.1%
Exeter3153857022.2%
Glen Parva664712487.2%
Gloucester2362774117.4%
Guys Marsh487509224.5%
High Down649702538.2%
Holloway477488112.3%
Leeds7701,23646660.5%
Leicester21935813963.5%
Lincoln36049113136.4%
Littlehey62462620.3%
Liverpool1,2161,228121.0%
Low Newton215234198.8%
Manchester9531,07612312.9%
Moorland740764243.2%
Mount705732273.8%
New Hall3273653811.6%
Northallerton1351976245.9%
Norwich56166910819.3%
Parc8449298510.1%
Pentonville8971,09820122.4%
Preston30155625554.7%
Ranby725741162.2%
Shepton Mallet991101111.1%
Shrewsbury18531913472.4%
Stocken556573173.1%
Styal412428163.9%
Usk2513217027.9%
Verne552562101.8%
Wandsworth1,1281,30217415.4%
Wayland62062550.8%
Winchester45556410924.0%
Wolds360378185.0%
Wormwood Scrubs812856445.4%

3 Apr 2001 : Column WA106

Trespassing

Baroness Buscombe asked Her Majesty's Government:

    How many prosecutions there were in 2000 under Section 61(4) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 of persons who failed to leave the land on which they were believed to be trespassing after being directed to do so by a police officer; and[HL1406]

    How many persons were arrested in 2000 under Section 61(5) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994; and[HL1407]

    How many vehicles appearing to belong to a trespasser or to be in a trespasser's possession or to be under a trespasser's control were seized and

3 Apr 2001 : Column WA107

    removed in 2000 by a constable exercising his powers under Section 62 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.[HL1408]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Information for 2000 is not yet available.

Information taken from the Home Office's Court Proceedings Database, however, shows that three persons were prosecuted for offences under Section 61(4) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 in England and Wales in 1999. There were no prosecutions in Scotland and data for Northern Ireland for 1999 are not yet available.

Details of persons arrested under Section 61(5) and vehicles seized under Section 62 of the Act are not available centrally.

Clandestine Entrants: Civil Penalties

Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Since the Carriers Liability (Clandestine Entrants and Sale of Transporters) Regulations 2000 came into effect:


    (a) how many clandestine entrants have been detected;


    (b) what is the number and total value of penalties imposed;


    (c) what is the number and total value of penalties paid; and


    (d) how many appeals against the penalties are outstanding. [HL1438]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Since 3 April 2000 when the civil penalty provisions of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 were introduced, and as at 27 March 2001, a total of 4,650 clandestine entrants have been detected in road vehicles arriving in the United Kingdom. Eight hundred and thirty-four penalties with a combined value of £9,240,000, have been imposed, of which 102, with a total value of £854,000, have been paid in full. Agreement has been reached for the settlement by instalments of a further 53 penalties together valued at £596,000, of which part payment amounting to £155,000 has been received.

There are currently 210 notices of objection against the imposition of a penalty under consideration.

Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Since the Carriers Liability (Clandestine Entrants and Sale of Transporters) Regulations 2000 came into effect, how many lorries have been impounded:


    (a) at the time of serving of the notice of liability to civil penalty; and


    (b) after loss of appeal. [HL1439]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Since 3 April 2000 when the civil penalty provisions of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 were introduced and as at 27 March 2001, a total of 209 vehicles have been detained. Of these, 152 have subsequently been released upon

3 Apr 2001 : Column WA108

payment of the penalty imposed or of a satisfactory alternative security.

In all cases, detention of the vehicle took place following the serving of the notice of liability to civil penalty.

Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Since the Carriers Liability (Clandestine Entrants and Sale of Transporters) Regulations 2000 came into effect, what criteria are used by the Chief Immigration Officer in deciding that a lorry should be impounded at the time of entry into the United Kingdom because "there is a significant risk that the penalty will not be paid . . . before the end of the prescribed period" (Immigration Service--Notice of Detention of Transporter).[HL1440]

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The civil penalty provisions of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, which were introduced on 3rd April 2000, provide that a relevant vehicle may be detained following the giving of a notice of liability to civil penalty.

The power to detain a vehicle may be exercised only if in the opinion of the senior officer concerned there is a significant risk that the penalty (or one or more of the penalties) will not be paid before the end of the prescribed period if the transporter is not detained. The Carriers' Liability (Clandestine Entrants and Sale of Transporters) Regulations 2000 prescribe the period in which payment must be made as being 60 days from the date of the giving of the notice of liability to civil penalty.

In determining whether or not it is appropriate to detain a vehicle, the senior officer will consider all factors that may indicate a significant risk that the penalty will not be paid within the prescribed period. These will include the amount of the penalty imposed, the financial standing of the company or individual involved, their willingness to pay and any history of late or non-payment of previous penalties they may have incurred. The senior officer will also take account of any alternative security that may be put forward.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page