Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Burlison asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer:
Lord McIntosh of Haringey: Compliance statistics for the nine months to 31 December 2001 show an increased effectiveness in the Inland Revenue's compliance programme. Of the 16,016 inquiries completed in this period, 5,427 cases (34 per cent) were found to contain discrepancies and these produced a compliance yield of £10.4 million.
I very much regret having to report that the Inland Revenue has advised me that some previous statistics relating to tax credit compliance have proved to be incorrect or incomplete. The correct equivalent figures for the year ended 31 March 2001 are that, of the 31,211 inquiries completed in that year, 5,573 cases (18 per cent) were found to contain discrepancies producing a compliance yield of £7.7 million.
These errors in the Inland Revenue's tax credit statistics have also resulted in incorrect information being given in responses to some Written Parliamentary Questions, in letters to honourable Members and during debates. I am writing to the Members concerned correcting errors and I will place a copy of the letters in the Libraries of both Houses.
Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord McIntosh of Haringey: As announced in the Pre-Budget Report in November 2001 and following consultation with business, the new corporation tax regime for substantial shareholdings will apply for disposals on or after 1 April 2002; the new corporation tax regime for intangible assets will also apply with effect from 1 April 2002.
In addition, the Government are also proceeding with the new tax credit to encourage research and development by large companies which will apply from 1 April 2002. The credit will follow a simple volume based approach, final details of which will be announced in the Budget.
Technical details of these measures will be published today and will be available to Peers from the Printed Paper Office.
Lord Merlyn-Rees asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Attorney-General (Lord Goldsmith): In the Parliamentary Answer given by the then Attorney-General on 12 March 2001 (col WA 68) he announced that the Government had accepted all the recommendations in principle but had opted for a phased approach to implementation.
Since that announcement, the Prosecutions Group of the Solicitors Office has forged ahead with a rapid programme of change to enable it to deliver legal services of a high quality in a responsive and flexible way. New managers and staff have been recruited, the organisation has been restructured and working practices are being reformed.
The Parliamentary Answer also referred to accountability for the prosecutions function moving from the commissioners to the Attorney-General on 1 April 2002.
Final agreement has not yet been reached on the implementation of Recommendation 4 of the Gower/Hammond recommendations which recommends that in relation to the prosecution function the solicitor for the Customs and Excise should not be funded by the commissioners but should have his own ring-fenced budget and be accountable for his own expenditure.
This recommendation is accepted in principle by the Government but there are technical issues relating to the estalishment of a separate vote which require further time to resolve. The Government are committed to the full implementation of Recommendation 4 no later than 1 April 2003, but in the meantime the Prosecutions Group budget will remain as part of the Customs and Excise vote, though it will be separately identified and managed by the solicitor for the Customs and Excise and financial accounts reports will be produced as if that budget had been established as a separate vote.
As a consequence of these revised arrangements, the Attorney-General will not assume full accountability for the prosecutions function from 1 April. Instead, from that date the following arrangements will apply:
The Government are satisfied that the arrangements that will apply from 1 April strengthen the involvement of the Attorney-General with the difficult and complex criminal casework conducted by the Solicitors Office, maintain the momentum of change that has been established and preserve an appropriate position on parliamentary accountability. maria
Lord Carlile of Berriew asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry (Lord Sainsbury of Turville): No. If there was any suggestions of impropriety then this would properly be a matter for the Local Government Ombudsman to look into.
The Earl of Northesk asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Sainsbury of Turville: The UK Online annual report, published in December 2001, detailed progress towards our broadband targets. Broadband services in the UK had continued to develop over the year, and 60 to 65 per cent of the country is now covered by an affordable broadband technology.
Progress is being made by industry and government. Last year we announced a £30 million fund to encourage broadband roll-out in each region of the country, last week we set out how that money would be spent in each region and earlier this month the Government welcomed BT's announcement that they were looking to reduce wholesale prices for broadband.
Baroness Blatch asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Skills (Baroness Ashton of Upholland): We announced our intention to license sector skills councils (SSCs) in October 2001. Five trailblazer SSCs were announced in December. The new Sector Skills Development Agency (SSDA) will shortly invite employers to bring forward expressions of interest to form SSCs for their sectors. Expressions of interest will be assessed by the SSDA against the criteria detailed in the SSC development guide published in December. Successful sectors will receive funding to develop a full proposal within six months. The SSDA will recommend licences for those sectors whose proposals meet the SSC standard. To ensure that only those sectors where there is strong employer leadership and demand for a SSC come forward, there is no time limit by when employers must submit an expression of interest. maria
Baroness Blatch asked Her Majesty's Government:
(a) if they are in a school with a sixth form;
(b) if they are in a school without a sixth form.[HL3350]
Baroness Ashton of Upholland: All pupils who take GCSEs early will need clear routes for progression in their learning. The range and type of opportunities for progression will vary according to circumstances. The Green Paper 14-19: extending opportunities, raising standards notes the significance of institutional collaboration in the use of facilities and teaching staff; highlights the potential of ICT and interactive learning and of the Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth; and recognises the implications for teacher training and development. The Green Paper confirms that further guidance and support materials will be developed.
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page