Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Lipsey asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord McIntosh of Haringey: The Government propose to lay before Parliament the following statutory instruments:
The Countess of Mar asked Her Majesty's Government: Janice
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Bach): Comprehensive cancer registration data provided by the Office for National Statistics' NHS Central Register on registrations in England and Wales is currently available only for the period up to 31 December 1998 as follows:
UK Gulf veterans | General Population estimate (Note 3) | |
Renal Cancer (Note 1) | ||
Diagnosis: | 5 | 6 |
Of whom Deaths | 1 | 3 |
Lymphoid Leukaemia (Note 2) | ||
Diagnosis: | 1 | 3 |
Of whom Deaths | 1 | 2 |
Notes:
1. Renal cancer or malignant neoplasm of the kidney (International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9th Revision code 189.0 and ICD 10th Revision code C64). Excludes malignant neoplasm of the renal pelvis (ICD) 9th Revision code 189.1 and ICD 10th Revision code C65) because this condition is histologically and aetiologically different from the other renal cancers described in the table.
2. The different manifestations of lymphocytic leukaemia are included in the classification for lymphoid leukaemia in ICD
9th Revision codes 204.0 to 204.9 and ICD 10th Revision code C91.
3. The estimates for the general population have been calculated by applying the age and gender specific rates for the general population resident in England and Wales to the Gulf veteran cohort.
Drawing conclusions about health from a comparison of service personnel with the general population may not necessarily be valid because, for example, Armed Forces selection procedures are designed to identify and exclude those who are medically unsuitable for service due to poor health and fitness or have a predisposition to develop ill health. The emphasis given to maintaining physical fitness and the different healthcare arrangements provided for Armed Forces personnel during their career are additional examples of why such a comparison can be misleading. It is for these reasons that an era comparison group of UK service personnel was identified with whom the health of Gulf veterans is compared by the Ministry of Defence. I outlined the composition of the era comparison group in my recent Answer to my noble friend Lord Morris of Manchester
(Official Report, 25 February 2002, columns
WA 17778). The MoD is conducting an analysis of the incidence of all cancers in Gulf veterans and the era group with the aim of making the findings available later this year.
Janice
Baroness Thomas of Walliswood asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Bach: During the 200001 and 200102 Sessions the Ministry of Defence has not proposed any legislation for which specific consultation with women's organisations was required.
Baroness Thomas of Walliswood asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Bach: The requirement to consider the impact of proposals, either directly or indirectly, on different groups of people, including women, is embedded in the Ministry of Defence's guidance to policy makers and as such is taken into account as a matter of course. Information on individual gender impact assessments is not held centrally and could be provided only by the use of disproportionate time and effort.
Janice
Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (Lord Falconer of Thoroton): I have asked the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr Tim Matthews, to write to the noble Lord.
Letter from the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr Tim Matthews, dated 25 April 2002.
I have been asked by the Minister of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about
First, thank you for your swift action in contacting our Managing Agents, W S Atkins Consultants Ltd, on 15 April, when you discovered people on site. This enabled us to find out further details of the incident including who had organised the cutting back of the planting. The matter has been reported to Essex Police and we intend to pursue it vigorously.
Clearly, we cannot guarantee that others will not attempt to cut back the planting on the embankment in the future. But those with an interest in the advertising hoardings know our views and know we will take the strongest action against those proved to have caused criminal damage and trespass. I shall see that you are kept in touch with developments.
maria
Which women's organisations have been consulted over proposed legislation by the Ministry of Defence during the 200001 and 200102 Sessions; and whether their responses have been published. [HL3719]
What was the subject of each gender impact assessment drawn up by the Ministry of Defence since June 1997; and, in each case, whether the outcome had been put out to consultation or published. [HL3720]
What action they intend to take to bring to justice those who were responsible for the criminal damage caused to property of the Highways Agency by the cutting down on 15 April of planting on government land along the A12 trunk road embankment adjacent to the advertising hoardings on land owned by Braintree District Council at Witham; and what steps they are taking to prevent further damage to Highways Agency planting along the A12 Witham bypass.[HL3835]
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page