Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Baroness Lockwood asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: All local authorities with social service responsibilities submitted their Quality Protects Management Action Plans (MAPs) to the Department of Health by the end of January. The Social Services Inspectorate has now completed its evaluation of the MAPs and we have considered its findings. The MAPs from all 150 local councils have reached an acceptable standard. Therefore, subject to parliamentary approval of the special grant report, they will receive payment of their allocation of the children's services grant from 200102.
Lord Laird asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Lord Privy Seal (Lord Williams of Mostyn): As I indicated in my Answer to the noble Lord of 1 May. (Official Report, WA 133), the Belfast agreement affirmed the parties recognition of the ''importance of respect, understanding and tolerance in relation to linguistic diversity, including in Northern Ireland, the Irish language, Ulster-Scots and the languages of the various ethnic communities, all of which are part of the cultural wealth of the island of Ireland.''
The Northern Ireland Office fully supports all aspects of the Belfast agreement, and in liaison with Northern Ireland departments will issue guidance on handling linguistic diversity in the near future.
Lord Swinfen asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Williams of Mostyn: Members of the Commons who retire or are not re-elected have been eligible for resettlement grants since 1971. Since 1950, Boundary Commission reviews have either maintained or increased the total number of seats. The reduction in the number of parliamentary seats in Scotland as a result of Secton 86 of the Scotland Act is a new factor. The Government are considering whether additional measures are needed; any proposals will be brought before the House of Commons.
Lord Acton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Williams of Mostyn: The time-scales set out in the Question reflect the agreed position between the Government and the House of Lords, as expressed in paragraph 9.35 of the Companion to the Standing Orders.
In relation to the House of Commons, the majority of committees in that House scrutinise individual departments. This facilitates speedy response since responsibility for the response rests usually with the one department. However, in their response to a
Liaison Committee report in another place the Government noted, "The longer and more complex a report and the more it focuses on cross-cutting issues, the greater the need for time to consider and consult." The Government also drew attention to the fact that, "Departments may not be able, in all circumstances, to meet this [two month] deadline, particularly if a report is complex." (Cm 4737, paragraphs 31 and 32). House of Lords committees are not departmentally linked and so are intrinsically more likely to undertake complex inquiries. Accordingly, it makes sense to retain the option of a longer response time.The Government attempt to respond to reports of the Eurpean Union Committee more quickly because the scrutiny reserve requires them to be dealt with swiftly.
Lord Kilclooney asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Williams of Mostyn: The total cost of the Office of the Oversight Commissioner during the period 1 May 2000 to 30 April 2002 was £1,171,841.97.
Lord Janner of Braunstone asked the Chairman of Committees:
The Chairman of Committees (Lord Tordoff): The cleaning of the external facades of the Palace of Westminster began in 1981 and was completed in 1993 with the restoration of Victoria Tower. Cleaning and restoration of the stonework in the courtyards of the Palace is in progress and work on Speaker's Court and Royal Court is now finished. The target date for final completion is 2009.
Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |