Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


Special Educational Needs

Baroness Darcy de Knayth asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Skills (Baroness Ashton of Upholland): The latest information available is shown in the table.

Figures for 2000–01 will be available shortly.


Number of permanent exclusions by special educational needs in maintained primary and secondary schools and special schools in England


Academic year 1999–2000

Excluded pupils: with statements of SENwithout statements of SENTotal
England1,4946,8298,323
North East61421482
Darlington12627
Durham1995114
Gateshead21214
Hartlepool11415
Middlesbrough123
Newcastle upon Tyne76673
North Tyneside64450
Northumberland93342
Redcar and Cleveland23537
South Tyneside03636
Stockton-on-Tees12627
Sunderland123244
North West1811,1331,314
Blackburn with Darwen33740
Blackpool41721
Bolton143650
Bury53439
Cheshire3386119
Cumbria43539
Halton43135
Knowsley156
Lancashire27140167
Liverpool12163175
Manchester1599114
Oldham05151
Rochdale24143
Salford86977
Sefton55156
St Helens42428
Stockport94251
Tameside43741
Trafford42630
Warrington42832
Wigan94453
Wirral103747
Yorkshire and the Humber169650819
Barnsley103343
Bradford2096116
Calderdale2911
Doncaster2992121
East Riding of Yorkshire41620
Kingston Upon Hull, City of32730
Kirklees185472
Leeds195271
North East Lincolnshire13738
North Lincolnshire83139
North Yorkshire83240
Rotherham122032
Sheffield2784111
Wakefield75259
York11516
East Midlands118578696
Derby64147
Derbyshire187391
Leicester3473107
Leicestershire136780
Lincolnshire2285107
Northamptonshire1590105
Nottingham55055
Nottinghamshire597102
Rutland022
West Midlands1659391,104
Birmingham22252274
Coventry148195
Dudley73239
Herefordshire22527
Sandwell18114132
Shropshire71623
Solihull92837
Staffordshire168399
Stoke-on-Trent174360
Telford and Wrekin104050
Walsall64551
Warwickshire127082
Wolverhampton12526
Worcestershire2485109
East of England135600735
Bedfordshire114556
Cambridgeshire02020
Essex28154182
Hertfordshire33142175
Luton31215
Norfolk265884
Peterborough92938
Southend-on-Sea42529
Suffolk1684100
Turrock53136
London2441,0451,289
Inner London99417516
Camden71522
City of London011
Hackney82331
Hammersmith and Fulham51621
Haringey101525
Islington51520
Kensington and Chelsea22224
Lambeth121931
Lewisham116475
Newham82533
Southwark66369
Tower Hamlets62531
Wandsworth167894
Westminster33639
Outer London145628773
Barking and Dagenham82331
Barnet154257
Bexley72633
Brent65157
Bromley91928
Croydon147387
Ealing12627
Enfield66773
Greenwich113243
Harrow33639
Havering33134
Hillingdon74047
Hounslow183452
Kingston upon Thames21416
Merton32023
Redbridge42529
Richmond upon Thames71825
Sutton71219
Waltham Forest143953
South East2569951,251
Bracknell Forest72229
Brighton and Hove93645
Buckinghamshire174663
East Sussex195372
Hampshire24157181
Isle of Wight7411
Kent53200253
Medway146175
Milton Keynes23335
Oxfordshire284876
Portsmouth12627
Reading53035
Slough2810
Southampton11415
Surrey28105133
West Berkshire11516
West Sussex28103131
Windsor and Maidenhead32225
Wokingham71219
South West165468633
Bath and North East Somerset62026
Bournemouth257
Bristol, City of3866104
Cornwall184058
Devon255479
Dorset92635
Gloucestershire118091
Isles of Scilly000
North Somerset172441
Plymouth41923
Poole235
Somerset55762
South Gloucestershire51823
Swindon61420
Torbay21618
Wiltshire152641

Source:

Annual Schools' Census.


16 Jul 2002 : Column WA143

DPP Annual Report

Baroness Gould of Potternewton asked Her Majesty's Government:

    When the Director of Public Prosecutions will publish his annual report.[HL5300]

    The Attorney-General (Lord Goldsmith): I can confirm that I have today placed a copy of the annual report in the Library.

Pension Funds

Lord Higgins asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hollis of Heigham on 26 June (WA 146), whether the proportion of all pension fund assets held in equities is significantly less than 100 per cent; and, if so, whether the statement to the House on 27 May (HL Deb, col. 1040) that "what happened on the stock market . . . has wiped one third or so off the value of pensions funds" was wrong and misleading; and[HL4987]

    What is their estimate of the average proportion of pension fund assets held in equities; and[HL4988]

    Whether they are aware of any pension fund which holds all of its assets in equities.[HL4989]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Baroness Hollis of Heigham): My statement on 27 May (HL Deb col. 1040) and subsequent Answer of 26 June

16 Jul 2002 : Column WA144

(WA 146) were based on awareness that equity holdings vary between pension funds, dependent, for example, of the maturity of the fund and the investment policies being followed. But equity holdings are often substantial, ranging up to 100 per cent in some cases. Industry information on individual pension fund assets distributions can be found in the annual directory Pension Funds and their Advisers, published by AP Information Services. This includes details of 2,600 major occupational schemes. In the 2002 edition, a small minority of companies is listed in this publication as having a 100 per cent exposure to equities.

It is estimated that, on average, between 70 and 75 per cent of all pension fund assets are invested in UK and overseas equities. This is based on industry data on pension fund asset distribution collected by Russell Mellon/CAPS, covering the period 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2002. The market value of pension funds with a relatively high proportion of equity investments is more likely to follow stock market trends than the value of those with a lower proportion of equity holdings. The words used in my Answer on both 27 May and 26 June—"a third or so" and "the same general order"—were designed to offer a broad-brush assessment of the likely impact. They were clearly not intended to provide a precise quantitative estimate nor to imply that the effects of stock market falls on the value of some individual funds would equate to the impact on the value of pension funds generally.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

Lord Alton of Liverpool asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Why the publication of the annual report for 2001 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority was delayed; and whether they believe such delay prejudices effective scrutiny of the role and functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; and[HL5180]

    When the next annual report of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is due to be published; and whether they anticipate any delay in the publication of the report.[HL5181]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has identified some problems with its information technology infrastructure. These problems are now being resolved but they have delayed the availability of recent performance data.

The annual report was held back in the hope that the data would be ready to include. When this proved not to be possible, the decision was taken to go ahead and publish the annual report without the data. The data will be made available shortly on the HFEA's website.

16 Jul 2002 : Column WA145

Apart from the annual report, effective scrutiny of the HFEA takes place in a number of ways, including the laying before Parliament of the Comptroller and Auditor General's report of the HFEA's annual accounts, and the authority's appearance before parliamentary committees.

The HFEA intends to publish its next annual report in November 2002. No delay in the publication is envisaged.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page