Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Filkin: The published Immigration Rules, as approved by Parliament, require any person arriving in the United Kingom, or seeking entry through the Channel Tunnel, to produce a valid passport or other document satisfactorily establishing his/her nationality and identity. Passengers arriving in the United Kingdom who are subject to immigration control must seek leave to enter from an immigration officer in order to establish whether they meet the requirements of those Immigration Rules. Personal details, including passport number, will be checked against the Immigration Service's warnings index.
Immigration ports of entry to the United Kingdom currently have no ability to record electronically machine readable passports, but the majority do have computerised warnings index equipment to read these passports.
The Immigration Service is currently testing several devices and their output relating to the technology needed to record data from machine-readable passports. A short and limited experiment was conducted at Dover during May 2002 for the purpose of trialling a particular piece of equipment in a
working control environment. The data from the trial is still being evaluated.
Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Filkin: It is not possible to establish precisely how many illegal entrants have reached the United Kingdom after travelling through the Channel Tunnel on freight trains. Some are detected inland and cannot be attributed to a particular port of entry and some claim to use the Channel Tunnel but have in fact entered by a different route.
Provisional management information for 2000 shows that 100 illegal entrants arrived at Cheriton platform having travelled on board open-sided freight shuttles through the Channel Tunnel.
In 2001 and the first quarter of 2002, locally collected, provisional management information indicates the following monthly arrivals:
Cheriton Platform Arrivals | Number |
Jan 2001 | 195 |
Feb 2001 | 411 |
Mar 2001 | 515 |
Apr 2001 | 553 |
May 2001 | 565 |
June 2001 | 745 |
Jul 2001 | 808 |
Aug 2001 | 726 |
Sep 2001 | 465 |
Oct 2001 | 133 |
Nov 2001 | 40 |
Dec 2001 | 36 |
Jan 2002 | 100 |
Feb 2002 | 61 |
Mar 2002 | 31 |
In 2000, 1,312 illegal entrants arrived at Dollands Moor rail freight yard having arrived on freight trains through the Channel Tunnel.
In 2001 and the first quarter of 2002 provisional management information indicates the following numbers of illegal entrants who were detected having arrived in the United Kingdom at Dollands Moor:
Lord Hardy of Wath asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Filkin: A package of assistance is being introduced for a trial six month period to assist reintegration of those Afghans who return home voluntarily. It will be offered to those who have, on 14 August 2002, asylum claims awaiting decision or appeal, or who have received exceptional leave to remain. Payments of £600 for individuals and up to £2,500 for families, to be paid after departure, reflect an equitable payment to make return to Afghanistan sustainable.
Parliamentary approval to this new service will be sought in a Supplementary Estimate for the Home Office RFR1 (H). Pending that approval, urgent expenditure estimated at £1,685,000 will be met by repayable advances from the Contingencies Fund.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:
Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Filkin on 18 July (WA 172), whether in giving "sympathetic consideration" to applications made by British overseas citizens prior to coming into force of the provisions in the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill, they will ensure that British Asian passport holders previously eligible under the Special Voucher Scheme will not receive any less favourable treatment than that they would have received prior the scheme's abolition on 5 March; and[HL5512]
Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Filkin on 18 July (WA 172), why they decided to abolish the Special Voucher Scheme with immediate effect on 5 March, having regard to their intention to introduce the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill.[HL5513]
Dollands Moor Arrivals Number
Jan 2001 189
Feb 2001 139
Mar 2001 151
Apr 2001 40
May 2001 121
June 2001 92
Jul 2001 68
Aug 2001 69
Sep 2001 35
Oct 2001 274
Nov 2001 289
Dec 2001 96
Jan 2002 57
Feb 2002 288
Mar 2002 109
What arrangements have been put in place for the funding of the Assisted Voluntary ReturnsAfghanistan scheme.[HL5734]
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Filkin on 18 July (WA 172), whether the British Asian passport holders seeking to enter and settle in the United Kingdom are worse off now than they were under the Special Voucher Scheme; and, if so, what is the justification for this; and[HL5511]
24 Sept 2002 : Column WA215
Lord Filkin : British Overseas Citizen (BOC) passport holders were only eligible to apply for a special voucher if they lived in East Africa or had an East African connection, where they were under pressure to leave their country and held no other nationality. The scheme was abolished in March because it no longer served the purpose for which it was set up and, since that time, BOCs wishing to settle in the United Kingdom have had to qualify under the general provisions of the Immigration Rules. Sympathetic consideration will be given to applications from BOCs in special cases of hardship but each case will be determined on its own merit.
At the time the scheme was abolished there was no intention of introducing a more general right of settlement for BOCs. However, following representations about the position of BOCs with no other nationality, the Government announced its intention to include some provision in the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill. Under these provisions, all BOCs who hold no other nationality and have not renounced any other nationality will have the right to register as British citizens.
Lord Greaves asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Filkin: The pledge component of the proposed citizenship oath and pledge is intended to symbolise a new British citizen's commitment to the core values of the United Kingdom.
An independent group of experts is being convened to advise the Home Secretary on the content of a citizenship curriculum for naturalisation applicants. The group will no doubt wish to consider, amongst other matters, what the curriculum should include on the question of the rights and responsibilities associated with citizenship.
Baroness Hanham asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Filkin: Section 8(a) and (b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 which covers the production or attempted production, supply and attempted supply of controlled drugs to another on premises applies to all controlled drugs including crack cocaine. Last year, the Government introduced an amendment to Section 8(d) of the 1971 Act through Section 38 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. The amendment extended
the scope of Section 8(d), which covered the use of cannabis and opium, to cover the use of all controlled drugs including crack cocaine on premises in order to strengthen police powers to deal with the proliferation of crack houses.It was also recognised that the strengthening of Section 8(d) could impinge on the legitimate harm reduction activities of those working in the care sector. The Government therefore undertook that, before the amendment was implemented, Notes of Guidance outlining how it should be enforced must be published. Work is currently being undertaken to publish the Notes of Guidance and implement Section 8(d).
Section 9 of the 1971 Act applies to opium only.
Lord Morris of Manchester asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): The National Institute for Clinical Excellence's (NICE) appraisal of photodynamic therapy has been extended to allow further consideration of the draft guidance. It is likely that the guidance will not now be available before January 2003.
Guidance issued in August 1999 to all National Health Service bodies asked them to continue with local arrangements for the managed introduction of new technologies where there was no guidance from NICE at the time. These arrangements should involve an assessment of all the relevant factors including the available evidence on effect.
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page