House of Lords
Session 2002 - 03|
Publications on the internet
Other Bills before Parliament
Arrangement of Clauses (Contents)
These notes refer to the Co-Operatives And Community Benefit Societies Bill
CO-OPERATIVES AND COMMUNITY BENEFIT SOCIETIES BILL
1. These explanatory notes relate to the Co-operatives and Community Benefit Societies Bill as brought from the House of Commons on 7th April 2003. They have been prepared by HM Treasury, with the consent of the Lord Carter, the Peer in charge of the Bill, in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament.
2. These notes need to be read in conjunction with the Bill. They are not meant to be a comprehensive description of it.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
3. The purpose of the Bill is to amend the law relating to societies registered under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 ("the 1965 Act"). There are two forms of such societies - 'bona fide co-operatives' and 'societies conducted for the benefit of the community' (community benefit societies) - which offer an alternative corporate structure to companies regulated under the Companies Acts. Bona fide co-operative societies are run by their members, for their members, whilst community benefit societies are enterprises which benefit the community and in relation to which there exist special reasons why they should not be registered as companies. Such societies can carry out a wide range of services, for example they can be retail societies, agricultural societies, housing associations or working men's clubs.
4. The aims of the Bill are to:
5. Currently it is not possible for investors in a community benefit society to be certain that its assets will always be used for the purpose of serving the community. For example, it is possible for a society to convert into a company and use its assets in whichever way it wishes. The Strategy Unit Report Private Action, Public Benefit noted that this situation posed a "serious deterrent to funders" of these societies. The aim of Clause 1 is to address this situation, by allowing for a regime under which members of a society could vote to prohibit irrevocably the distribution of assets other than for the benefit of the community, or the conversion of the society to a company or the transfer of its assets to another body, unless that company or body was also subject to a regime irrevocably restricting the use of and dealing with those assets (an asset "lock-in" regime).
6. Currently a society must limit itself to activities which are permitted by its rules. This creates a risk for those dealing with societies that transactions may be void if a society has acted outside its powers. Further, if the committee of a society has acted beyond its powers in entering a transaction, then the transaction will be void, even if it is within the powers of the society itself. These risks place a burden on a party to a contract with a society to verify that the society's rules permit it to enter the proposed contract, and to check that the committee is acting within its powers. This in turn may increase the costs and time involved in entering contracts, or deter some from conducting business with a society because they perceive there is a risk of the contract being void.
7. The aim of Clause 3 is to remove these costs or risks by applying to societies and their committees provisions mirroring certain provisions which currently exist in company law. The Clause would ensure that an act done by a society would not be void simply because it was not permitted by the society's rules, or because the society's committee acted outside its powers in relation to the act. In addition, a party to a transaction with a society is relieved of the burden of having to enquire whether the transaction is permitted by the rules, or about any limitation on the powers of the committee to bind the society. But the provisions do not absolve the committee members from their duty to observe any limitation on their powers flowing from the rules, so they will remain liable to the society and the members to make good any loss resulting from acting outside those powers. The Clause includes special protections for societies which are charities, and Clause 2 imposes on those societies obligations to ensure that their charitable status is clear in business documentation.
8. A person involved in setting up a society may wish to make contracts in the name of that society before it has been legally registered. At that stage the society does not exist as a legal entity and any obligations or rights in the contracts entered into at this stage may be unenforceable. Clause 4 will address this situation, by allowing contracts to be enforceable against and by the person who has acted for or on behalf of the society.
9. Currently societies have to have a common seal, and have to use that seal when they enter into certain types of contracts or execute certain types of other documents. The need to have a common seal may impose a cost of having to have a seal made, and kept safe, and there may also be risks in having documents sent to where the seal is kept. Clause 5 removes these burdens by allowing societies to operate without a common seal, but also enables societies which do have a common seal to have further official seals for use overseas.
COMMENTARY ON CLAUSES
Clause 1: Community benefit societies: power to restrict use of assets
10. Subsection (1) will enable the Treasury to make regulations to enable community benefit societies to ensure that some or all of their assets can only ever be used or dealt with for the benefit of the community. The regulations may define which community benefit societies have this option.
11. Subsection (2) will enable the Treasury to prescribe in the regulations the purposes which are for the benefit of the community to which a community benefit society may "lock-in" its assets.
12. Subsection (4) will enable the regulations to cover certain matters in particular. For example it will allow the Treasury to make regulations: about the procedure by which a society can adopt an asset "lock-in"; about how assets which have been "locked-in" must be dealt with in certain circumstances, such as insolvency, in which the asset "lock-in" may cease to apply; and ensure that any person to whom "locked-in" assets are transferred can only use them for the same purposes for which the society could have used them.
13. Subsection (5) will enable the Treasury to make other provisions implementing an asset "lock-in" regime. For example, functions may be conferred on a body or other person to supervise compliance with the asset "lock-in" regime.
14. Subsection (7) requires any regulations under this section to be approved by affirmative resolution in each House of Parliament before they are made.
Clause 2: Status of charitable societies to appear on correspondence etc
15. Clause 2 inserts a new section 5A into the 1965 Act, requiring industrial and provident societies which are also charities to declare their charitable status on all correspondence and other official documents. Clause 3 relates to transactions performed outside the rules of the society. For those wishing to do business with societies it is important to know whether or not the society concerned is a charity. This could affect the validity of any transaction where there is the possibility that it might be outside the rules of the society. The new section 5A addresses this issue, by requiring a society which is a charity, but whose name does not include either "charity" or "charitable", to state that it is a charity, in correspondence and other specified documents. (Section 5A broadly corresponds to sections 68 and 96(1) of the Charities Act 1993 in relation to England and Wales, to section 112(1)(b) and (6) to (8) of the Companies Act 1989 in relation to Scotland and to section 349(3) and (4) of the Companies Act 1985).
Clause 3: Capacity of society and power of committee to bind it
16. Clause 3 amends the 1965 Act in line with company law in order to facilitate the ability of societies to enter into business transactions. It does this by inserting into the 1965 Act six new sections, numbered 7A to 7F.
17. Section 7A provides that the validity of an act performed by a society cannot be called into question on the basis that it is outside that society's rules. The section allows for members to restrain their society from performing an act which is beyond the rules, and preserves the liability of committee members if they do not observe any limitations on their powers under the rules unless the members agree to relief from such liability in a special resolution. (Section 7A(1) to (5) corresponds to section 35(1) to (4) of the Companies Act 1985; section 7A(6) corresponds to section 378(1) and (2) of that Act; and section 7A(7) is analogous to section 380(1) and (4)(a) of that Act).
18. Section 7B provides that, in favour of a person dealing with a society in good faith, the power of the society's committee to bind it shall be deemed not to be restricted by the society's rules. (Section 7B corresponds to section 35A of the Companies Act 1985).
19. Section 7C removes the burden from a party to a transaction with a society of having to enquire whether it is permitted by the society's rules, or of having to enquire about any limitation on the powers of the committee to bind the society. (Section 7C corresponds to section 35B of the Companies Act 1985).
20. Section 7D disapplies sections 7A and 7B from societies which are charities except in certain limited circumstances. Therefore, acts which are outside a charitable society's rules will continue to be void except in the specific circumstances outlined in this section. The aim is to ensure that the assets of societies which are charities are not used for a purpose for which they were not intended. (Section 7D corresponds to sections 65 and 96(1) of the Charities Act 1993 in relation to England and Wales, and to sections 112(1)(b) and (3) to (5) of the Companies Act 1989 in relation to Scotland).
21. Sections 7E and 7F make provision for the circumstance in which a society enters a transaction with a member of its own committee, or a person connected with a committee member or a company with whom a committee member is associated, and the committee, in connection with the transaction, acts beyond its powers. Such a transaction is voidable by the society. (Sections 7E and 7F correspond to sections 322A and 735(1)(a) of the Companies Act 1985).
Clause 4: Purported contracts, deeds and obligations
22. Clause 4 amends the 1965 Act to provide for contracts to be enforceable against and by a person who has acted for or on behalf of a society before it is registered. Subsection (1) deals with societies registered under the 1965 Act, by inserting a new section 29A corresponding to section 36C of the Companies Act 1985, inserted by section 130(4) of the Companies Act 1989. Subsection (2) applies the new section 29A to societies registered in Northern Ireland when operating in Great Britain.
Clause 5: Execution of deeds and other documents
23. Subsection (1) of Clause 5 inserts six new sections into the 1965 Act, numbered 29B to 29G, dealing with aspects of how societies execute deeds and other documents and enter into contracts, in line with similar provisions in company law.
24. Section 29B removes the obligation for societies to have a common seal while ensuring that appropriate provision is made for the custody and use of any common seal which a society does decide to have.
25. Section 29C corresponds to the remainder of section 36A of the Companies Act 1985, and sets out provisions on how documents can be executed by or on behalf of societies under the law of England and Wales, whether or not they have a common seal. It gives societies the choice to execute a document either through attaching their common seal or by getting it signed by the specified officers of the society, and subsections (4) and (5) create legal presumptions about when a document can be taken to have been validly executed and, in the case of a deed, delivered.
26. Section 29D provides for how documents can be executed by or on behalf of societies under the law of Scotland, whether or not they have a common seal. It corresponds to section 36B(2) and (3) of the Companies Act 1985, as substituted as regards Scotland by section 14 of the Requirements of Writing (Scotland) Act 1995.
27. Sections 29E, 29F and 29G aim to facilitate the ability of societies to enter into transactions overseas. They correspond to section 39 of the Companies Act 1985, as amended under section 130 of the Companies Act 1989, section 74 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1990 and section 14 of the Requirements of Writing (Scotland) Act 1995. The new sections enable societies to have official seals for use abroad, and make provision for the effect of the use of such seals and for authorising such use.
28. Subsections (2) to (7) of Clause 5 and the Schedule introduced by subsection (9) make various amendments to and repeals in the 1965 Act consequential upon the substantive provisions inserted by subsection (1). Subsection (8) makes a consequential amendment to the Land Registration Act 2002.
Clauses 6, 8 and 9: Interpretation, Channel Islands, Short Title and extent
29. These formal clauses include provisions allowing the Bill to be extended to the Channel Islands with appropriate modifications, and defining its territorial extent.
FINANCIAL EFFECTS OF THE BILL AND EFFECTS ON PUBLIC SERVICE MANPOWER
30. Any financial effects of the Bill and its effects on public service manpower will be negligible.
SUMMARY REGULATORY APPRAISAL
31. A draft Regulatory Impact Assessment has been prepared by the Treasury and placed in the House of Commons library.
32. Clause 1 will give the Treasury power to introduce an asset "lock-in" regime in the future, through secondary legislation. The clause in itself does not create any tangible costs or benefits. As noted in the Strategy Unit report "Private Action, Public Benefit" there are potential costs to community benefit societies under the current position - without an asset "lock-in" regime in place. However, any specific costs and benefits would depend on the detailed legislation which introduced such a regime - and this does not form part of the contents of this Bill. The Treasury intends to consult further and consider costs before making any associated secondary legislation under this power.
33. The draft assessment also sets out the effects of the other provisions which bring into line certain areas of industrial and provident society legislation with corresponding provisions in company law. The aim of the legislation in these areas is to reduce the transaction costs and risks for societies and to facilitate their business transactions. In general, these provisions are either permissive or should not impose any compliance costs on societies. The draft assessment notes that there may be some costs on societies which are charities to comply with the requirements on disclosure of their charitable status. However, this is to allow charities to continue to enjoy important protections in the way their assets could be used - in line with provisions which apply to companies which are charities.
34. Clause 7 of the Bill provides for it to be commenced by one or more Treasury orders, with any appropriate transitional provisions.
|© Parliamentary copyright 2003||Prepared: 1 May 2003|