Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


NHS Complaints Procedure

Baroness Golding asked Her Majesty's Government:

Baroness Andrews: We have published NHS complaints reform—making things right. It describes reforms to the NHS complaints procedure and sets out a programme to improve management of the whole complaints system, elements of which will be subject to the passage of the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill.

The programme builds on the existing NHS complaint procedure, as well as wider initiatives to introduce operational improvements focused on: making the system more flexible so that there is a range of ways in which people can express concerns about the services they have received; improving the local resolution stage so that formal complaints are more likely to be resolved, reducing the need for them to escalate unnecessarily; radical reform to the independent review stage, subject to primary legislation—by placing responsibility for it with the new Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection (CHAI); and making sure information about complaints and their causes are an integral part of the system that assures safe, high quality care, which is constantly improving.

We will achieve this through a combination of changes to the structure and operation of the complaints procedure itself and by recognising the place complaints management has in the system for improving services and the quality of patients' experience of healthcare.

The need for primary legislation to establish CHAI means it will not be fully operational before April 2004. This dictates the timetable for comprehensive reform of the NHS complaints procedure as a whole. In the meantime, we will pursue supporting initiatives to bring about improvements in the general approach to complaints in the NHS and pave the way for the more substantive reforms in 2004.

Copies of NHS complaints reform—making things right have been placed in the Library.

Children in Care: Education

Baroness Billingham asked Her Majesty's Government:

31 Mar 2003 : Column WA108

Baroness Andrews: The Department of Health's public service agreement (PSA), published July 2002, included a commitment to review the target on the education of children in care, in light of the Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) project on that subject. Work on the SEU project is nearing completion, and we are now in a position to announce the new target, which is to improve life chances for children, including by substantially narrowing the gap between the educational attainment and participation of children in care and that of their peers by 2006.

This target will have been achieved if, by 2006, outcomes for 11 year-olds in English and maths are at least 60 per cent as good as those of their peers; the proportion who become disengaged from education is reduced, so that no more than 10 per cent reach school-leaving age without having sat a General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) equivalent exam; and the proportion of those aged 16 who get qualifications equivalent to GCSEs graded A*–C has risen on average by four percentage points each year since 2002; and in all authorities at least 15 per cent of young people in care achieve this level of qualifications.

The elements of the PSA target relating to the level of education, training and employment outcomes for care leavers aged 19, the proportion of children in care who are cautioned or convicted and the under-18 conception rate remain unchanged.

In developing the target, the Secretary of State for Health has been keen to encourage action to support attainment by all children in care. This includes younger children, those who are able and have the potential to achieve at a high level and those with difficulties who need support to remain engaged with education at all.

The Secretary of State therefore welcomes the SEU's proposal that, as part of the existing planning process, individual education targets should be set for all children in care and that local authorities should monitor both the appropriateness and the achievement of targets by children in care. We will be consulting stakeholders on how best to achieve this.

In order that the target reflects the influence of the care system on attainment, it will apply only to children who have been in care for one year or more. Nonetheless, promoting the attainment of children who spend a shorter time in care is important. The Secretary of State for Education has therefore agreed to put in place arrangements to analyse data from pupil level annual school census in order to improve our understanding of outcomes for those young people who have spent any time in care. The results of this analysis will be to inform the development of future policy.

Copies of the technical note accompanying the new PSA target have been placed in the Library.

31 Mar 2003 : Column WA109

Interception of Communications Commissioner

Baroness Golding asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether the Interception of Communications Commissioner will be reappointed under Section 57(1) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.[HL2336]

The Lord Privy Seal (Lord Williams of Mostyn): In accordance with Section 57(1) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, after consultation with the Foreign, Home and Northern Ireland Secretaries and the Scottish First Minister, the Prime Minister has decided to re-appoint Sir Swinton Thomas as the Interception of Communications Commissioner from 11 April 2003 to 10 April 2006.

The Prime Minister is delighted that Sir Swinton Thomas has agreed to continue to serve as the Interception of Communications Commissioner.

M11: Litter

Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they will arrange for the litter to be removed from the verges of the M11 motorway between the A406 and the M25; and whether they will take steps to keep this section of the road clean in the future.[HL2154]

The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Lord Macdonald of Tradeston): Litter on the motorway network is cleared on a regular basis and was removed from this section of the M11 as recently as February this year. Litter will continue to be removed from this section in accordance with current policy. The Highways Agency requires its contractors for this area to carry out frequent inspections, and debris that could present a hazard to traffic is removed as a matter of priority. Other litter is removed regularly, having regard to the safety of the operatives who have to clear it.

Life Satisfaction

Lord Patten asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether, following the report of the Strategy Unit Life Satisfaction: the state of knowledge and implications for government published in December 2002, they have now adopted a policy definition of "life satisfaction".[HL2191]

Lord Macdonald of Tradeston: The Strategy Unit published the analytical discussion paper Life Satisfaction: the state of knowledge and implications for government to synthesise the relevant data, evidence and research. It is not a statement of government policy.

Nor does the report adopt a preferred policy definition for life satisfaction. Instead it reviews the various approaches in the literature.

31 Mar 2003 : Column WA110

The measure of life satisfaction used most widely by researchers and reported in the paper is the answer to questions such as: "All things considered, how satisfied are you with life as a whole?" Respondents then either answer "very", "fairly" or "not very" satisfied or grade their satisfaction on a scale of one-to-10.

Lord Patten asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they agree with the conclusion of the Strategy Unit in its report Life Satisfaction: the state of knowledge and implications for government, published in December 2002, that "there is a case for state intervention to boost life satisfaction".[HL2240]

Lord Macdonald of Tradeston: The Strategy Unit published the analytical paper Life Satisfaction: the state of knowledge and implications for government to synthesise the relevant data, evidence and research on the subject. It is not a statement of government policy.

The aim of the paper was to stimulate discussion. The Strategy Unit will be considering comments on the paper both from around Whitehall and the general public.

M1, Junction 19

Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:

    What is the cost of the proposed new junction layout for Junction 19 on the M1 motorway; what is the basis for demonstrating value for money for this scheme; how many minutes delay per annum they estimate the new layout will save; and what are the values of money per minute or delay saved used to assess the benefits, separately for (a) cars and (b) heavy goods vehicles.[HL2235]

Lord Macdonald of Tradeston: I have asked the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Tim Matthews, to write to the noble Lord.

Letter from the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Tim Matthews, dated 31 March 2003.

The Minister of State, Lord Macdonald of Tradeston, has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the cost and value for money of the proposed new junction at Junction 19 on the M1 Motorway.

The current estimated cost for this scheme is £100 million, including VAT.

Value for money was assessed using the Department for Transport's standard cost benefit analysis tool TUBA (Transport Users Benefit Appraisal) which includes calculation of user benefits and public and private sector transport provider impacts. The economic appraisal shows that the proposed scheme would provide significant journey time benefits to road users and reduced operating costs for both private and heavy goods vehicles.

31 Mar 2003 : Column WA111

The time-savings in vehicle hours for the 3 simulation years that were modelled in the appraisal are:


    Year 2006 99,762 vehicle hours


    Year 2011 322,392 vehicle hours


    Year 2021 1,035,972 vehicle hours.

I attach a schedule showing the calculated annualised time savings in vehicle hours and value of

31 Mar 2003 : Column WA112

time calculations for cars and heavy goods vehicles. You will appreciate that scheme development is at an early stage and these are preliminary figures which are subject to change.

I hope this is helpful. If you would like any further information, John Dutson, the Agency's Project Manager for the M1 Junction 19 scheme, would be pleased to help. He can be contacted at our offices at Broadway, Broad Street, Birmingham B15 1BL, or by telephone on 0121 678 8361.



   Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page