Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Pearson of Rannoch asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean): The task of the EEC was:
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: While the building of a separation wall for security reasons does not necessarily contravene international law, we do consider some aspects related to the construction of the "security fence" in the West Bank to be illegal. We do not believe that the route of the fence is determined by security requirements. We therefore conclude that much of the demolition and confiscation of Palestinian property associated with its construction violates the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits such measures unless absolutely necessary. We are concerned that the lack of access for Palestinian owners to land on the west of the security fence results in the de facto appropriation of this territory by Israel.
The military orders, which requisition land for the fence, allow the owners of the property to request rental fees or compensation.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: Our embassy in Tel Aviv has raised with the Government of Israel our concerns about the location and impact of the "security fence". We deplore the seizure of Palestinian land, the isolation of Palestinian villages, and the creation of a further physical obstacle to the two-state solution. My right honourable friend the Foreign Secretary conveyed the UK's concerns to the Israeli Foreign Minister on his visit of 15 May. Quartet members share our views. The Quartet road map calls on the Government of Israel to take no actions undermining trust, including the confiscation and/or demolition of Palestinian property. Lasting peace can only be achieved through a negotiated settlement and not unilateral actions.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: My right honourable friends the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary both discussed Chechnya in talks with President Putin and Foreign Minister Ivanov during the state visit. However, neither raised the role of the Council of Europe or the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe during these discussions.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: No. Our priority is to ensure implementation of the road map by both parties. This is therefore the current focus of our contacts with the Israeli Government.
Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: The Indonesian Government announced on 23 June the deployment of 36 British-built Scorpion vehicles to Aceh to defend roads against attack by the Free Aceh Movement (FAM).
Our embassy in Jakarta spoke to senior military contacts and reminded them of the assurances that British-built military equipment should not be used offensively or to violate human rights. We are carefully monitoring the extent of compliance with these assurances.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they intend to introduce legislation to make it unlawful to discriminate on grounds of age in the fields of education, housing, the provision of goods, facilities and services to the public, and in public sector provision; and, if not, why not; and [HL3821]
Which respondents to Towards Equality and Diversity, referred to in paragraph 3a of Towards Equality and Diversity: Report of responses on Age 2003, as "the age lobby", felt that age discrimination legislation should be extended to cover areas other than employment, such as goods and services; and what is their response. [HL3822]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry (Lord Sainsbury of Turville): Unfair age discrimination is intolerable wherever it occurs. The Government's priority is to
introduce effective and workable legislation outlawing age discrimination in employment and vocational training. That in itself requires the resolution of a number of complex and sensitive issues, which are discussed in our consultationEquality and Diversity: Age Matterslaunched on 2 July. We shall be following it up with a further consultation in 2004 on the draft legislation itself.In responding to our previous consultationTowards Equality and DiversityAge Concern England, the Third Age Employment Network, and the Association of Retired Persons Over 50 felt that legislation should be extended to goods and services.
The Government believe that legislating against age discrimination at work will help to form less ageist attitudes generally. Demographic and economic factors will also provide powerful incentives for providers of goods and services to change discriminatory attitudes and eliminate discriminatory practices.
The Earl of Mar and Kellie asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Culture, Media and Sport (Lord McIntosh of Haringey): It is a fundamental principle of the VAT system that tax incurred on purchases can only be reclaimed when it relates to taxable business activities. Businesses making VAT-exempt supplies, such as Royal Mail, cannot therefore reclaim the VAT they incur when purchasing the goods and services they need in order to make those supplies.
As the Minister for Science and Innovation made clear on 8 July (Official Report, col. 128), even if the VAT position were changed, there would nevertheless still be a very substantial saving for Royal Mail from their decision to withdraw from rail transport. The VAT cost will therefore have been only one of many factors likely to have been taken into account in coming to that decision. However, while the loss of business for rail freight is always regrettable, the Government remain committed to allowing Royal Mail the freedom it needs to take operational decisions in its best commercial interests.
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page