Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Lord Thomas of Gresford moved Amendment No. 155:
An offence under section 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent
An offence under section 4 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that the activity caused involved penetration within subsection (4)(a) to (d) of that section.
Rape of a child under 13
An offence under section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
Attempted rape of a child under 13
An offence under section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (c. 47) of attempting to commit an offence under section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
Assault of a child under 13 by penetration
An offence under section 6 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
Causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity
An offence under section 8 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that an activity involving penetration within subsection (3)(a) to (d) of that section was caused.
Sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder
An offence under section 31 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that the touching involved penetration within subsection (4)(a) to (d) of that section.
Causing or inciting a person with a mental disorder to engage in sexual activity
An offence under section 32 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that an activity involving penetration within subsection (4)(a) to (d) of that section was caused."
Page 220, line 10, leave out paragraph 15.
Page 220, line 15, leave out paragraph 16.
Page 221, line 7, leave out paragraphs 24 to 30.
Page 222, line 15, leave out paragraph 36.
Page 223, line 19, leave out paragraph 46.
Page 223, line 24, leave out paragraph 47.
Page 224, line 15, leave out paragraphs 55 to 61.
Leave out Schedule 4 and insert the following new Schedule
1 Murder.
Soliciting murder
2 An offence under section 4 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (c. 100) (conspiring or soliciting to commit murder).
Genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes
3 An offence under section 51 (genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes) or 52 (conduct ancillary to genocide, etc committed outside jurisdiction) of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (c. 17).
4 Murder.
Soliciting murder
5 An offence under section 4 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (c. 100).
Genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes
6 An offence under section 51 or 52 of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (c. 17).
The noble Lord said: My Lords, I have presented what I want to say on the amendment, but perhaps noble Lords will permit me to reply to the comments that the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General has just made. In particular, I draw his attention to paragraph 4.22 of the Law Commission's report, which states:
On the noble and learned Lord's other point about whether there is a principled basis for murder as opposed to any other crime, the Law Commission, at paragraph 4.34, said that,
The Law Commission's view on whether there is a principled distinction with murder is as I have described it. On the principle of disquiet to the public, the Law Commission is with us. For that reason, I beg to move the amendment.
Lord Goldsmith: My Lords, the Government's position is to resist the amendment. The amendments that have just been agreed and those that the noble Lord is moving do not admit of the principle to which he relates. The Law Commission quotations that he cited limit the position to murder; that is not what the noble Lord's amendment would do. He includes cases that do not involve death at allsoliciting murder might not; nor might war crimes and breaches of the Geneva Convention. I make no complaint about that. It is a question of balance.
Lord Thomas of Gresford: My Lords, on a point of information, genocide is covered by the Law Commission.
Lord Goldsmith: My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord that one does not find the right balance by limiting the scope to murderneither of us does. I continue to resist the amendment.
Lord Thomas of Gresford: My Lords, in those circumstances, I seek to obtain the opinion of the House.
"Any exception [to the double jeopardy rule] must, however, be limited to those types of cases where the damage to the credibility of the criminal justice system by an apparently illegitimate acquittal is manifest, and so serious that it overrides the values implicit in the rule against double jeopardy".
"murder, as the most serious form of homicide, is in a unique position and can as a matter of principle be separated off from all other offences. There is, we must accept, a potential problem with using such an analysis to justify treating murder in this way. Murder, as defined in English law, is not confined to deliberate killing".
It deals also with intent to cause serious harm. Even if most murderers are not deliberate killers, however, there is still an important sense in which deliberate killing is the core of the offence of murder. That is sufficient to justify concluding that it remains a unique offence, not merely one that is more serious than others.
3.55 p.m.
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 155) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 83; Not-Contents, 185.
Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.
4.6 p.m.
Clause 61 [Application to Court of Appeal]:
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page