Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

Written Statements

Tuesday 22 February 2005


 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS49
 

Northern Ireland Office: Change to DEL Funding for 2004–05

The Lord President of the Council (Baroness Amos): My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for
 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS50
 
Northern Ireland has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Subject to parliamentary approval the Northern Ireland Office (NIO) will be taking a 2004–05 spring Supplementary Estimate. The effect this will have is to increase the NIO's DEL by £47,954,000 from £1,236,190,000 to £1,284,144,000. Within the DEL change, the impact on resource and capital is as set out in the following table.
 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS49
 

Resource (£'000s)Capital (£'000s)
ChangeNew DELOf which:votedNon-votedChangeNew DELOf which:votedNon-voted
48,0541,201,508344,087857,421(100)82,63635,56147,075






The change in the resource element of the DEL by £48,054,000 arises from the draw down of £50,281,000 end-year flexibility and the surrender of PES transfers to other departments of £2,227,000.




 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS49
 

The extra resource is primarily required to fund a non-budget pressure relating to the PSNI FTR severance provision.

The change in the capital element of the DEL arises from the surrender of PES transfers to other departments of £100,000.

Northern Ireland: Parades

Baroness Amos: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I have been considering Sir George Quigley's review of parades, the subsequent consultation on his report, the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee (NIAC) report of January this year and the events of last summer. Each of these offers different perspectives on how to go forward and I have come to a balanced decision about how to respond.

I have decided that a case has not been made to make fundamental changes to parading arrangements in Northern Ireland. Parades have been increasingly peaceful over the past few years. The number of contentious parades has fallen. Out of approximately 2,000 parades notified last year, only 200 were regarded as "contentious" and two resulted in serious public order incidents. I think this shows the success of the arrangements we have here in reducing tension. I want to echo the words of NIAC, which concluded that the Parades Commission remains the best hope for developing the peaceful resolution of disputes. I will therefore not be pressing forward with the changes recommended by Sir George Quigley at this time. I am, however, indebted to Sir George for his insightful and
 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS50
 
intelligent contribution to the debate around parades in Northern Ireland. Although I am not adopting his recommendations, my thinking has been greatly influenced by his work and I am indebted to him for his insightful and intelligent contribution to the debate around parades in Northern Ireland.

I shall be laying an Order in Council to amend the law on parades. The order makes clear that the Parades Commission can make determinations that include supporters and followers. Some doubts have been raised about the commission's remit. The police and NIAC have asked me to put the matter beyond doubt before the summer.

At the same time, I intend to take on board Quigley and NIAC's recommendation that parades and related protests should be considered by the same body. The order will bring protestors within the remit of the Parades Commission. I have been persuaded that the time is right for the Parades Commission to take on this function.

I am also launching a wide-ranging consultation exercise on mediation. I think there is a great deal of potential for mediation to help defuse the tensions surrounding parades and I firmly believe that agreed outcomes are the best way to resolve disputes. However, there has not been agreement about how best to deliver mediation. I have today published a consultation paper on these issues. The consultation will close on 23 May 2005.

The NIAC's report contained other recommendations about how the Parades Commission could make the way it carries out its work more effective. I am aware that the commission is examining these and I look forward to hearing their response.

Senior Salaries Review Body

Baroness Amos: My right honourable friend the Prime Minister has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS51
 

The 27th report of the Review Body on Senior Salaries, which makes recommendations about the pay of the Senior Civil Service, senior military personnel and the judiciary, is being published today. Copies are available in the Vote Office and the Libraries of the House. The Government are grateful to the chairman and members of the review body for their work.

The main recommendations of the review body for the Senior Civil Service are:

The main recommendation of the review body for the senior military is:

The main recommendation of the review body for the judiciary is:

Pay increases for Members of Parliament and Ministers are linked automatically to the movement of the mid point of the pay bands for the Senior Civil Service. Their salaries will therefore increase by 2.8 per cent from 1 April 2005.

Department for International Development: Supplementary Estimates

Baroness Amos: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for International Development (Mr. Hilary Benn) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate, the Department for International Development departmental expenditure limit (DEL) will be increased by £163,106,000 from £3,758,690,000 to £3,921,796,000 and the administration costs limit will be increased by
 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS52
 
£10,024,000 from £222,000,000 to £232,024,000, Within the DEL change, the impact on resources and capital are as set out in the following table.
£'000s


New DEL
ChangeVotedNon-votedTotal
Resource136,0783,293,768607,5003,901,268
Capital22,52840,52840,528
Depreciation*4,500-20,000-20,000
Total163,1063,314,296607,5003,921,796




* Depreciation, which forms part of the resource DEL, is excluded from the total DEL, since capital DEL includes capital spending and to include depreciation of those assets would lead to double counting.





The change in the resource element of the DEL arises from:

Voted

A partial draw down of £10,000,000 of administration costs end year flexibility, as set out in the Public Expenditure 2003–04 Provisional Outturn White Paper (Cm 6293), for the administration of development programmes, humanitarian assistance, systems to improve efficiency, and the administration costs of the new Post-Conflict Reconstruction Unit.

A full draw down of £153,092,000 of other resource end year flexibility, as set out in the Public Expenditure 2003–04 Provisional Outturn White Paper (Cm 6293), for development programmes in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia and for programmes contributing to multiple objectives, and for the programme costs of the new Post-Conflict Reconstruction Unit.

A claim on the reserve of £25,000,000 in respect of humanitarian assistance following the earthquake and tsunami in south-east Asia.

A transfer of £500,000 from the Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs for development projects in Russia and the Ukraine.

A transfer of £24,000 of administration costs from the Cabinet Office relating to DfID's use of the Parliamentary Counsel's Office.

A transfer of £6,500,000 from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for planned programme activity on global conflict prevention.

A reduction of £1,038,000 in respect of a transfer to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for planned programme activity on conflict prevention in Africa.

A reduction of £16,000,000 relating to a transfer to the capital DEL of subscription costs for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

A reduction of £35,000,000 relating to the reclassification of the costs of DfID's investment in CDC Group plc from the DEL to annually managed expenditure.

Non-voted

A reduction of £7,000,000 relating to transfers of Africa conflict prevention unallocated provision to the Ministry of Defence (£2,920,000) and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (£4,080,000).
 
22 Feb 2005 : Column WS53
 

The change in the capital element of the DEL arises from:

Voted

A draw down of £6,528,000 of capital end-year flexibility, including £6,064,000 vired from other resource, as set out in the Public Expenditure 2003–04 Provisional Outturn White Paper (Cm 6293) for investment in improvements to management information and financial systems, acquisition of equity in Actis Capital llp, and the initial capital costs of the new Post-Conflict Reconstruction Unit.

An increase of £16,000,000 relating to a transfer from the resource DEL of subscription costs for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

The change in the adjustment for depreciation arises from forecasts being lower, by £4,500,000, than the total included in the main estimate.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page