House of Lords portcullis
House of Lords
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Identity Cards Bill


 
 

 

Identity Cards Bill

MARSHALLED LIST OF MOTIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO BE MOVED ON

CONSIDERATION OF commons REASONS

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 28, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

motion a

(lords amendments nos. 16 and 22)

Clause 5

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 16

16

Page 4, line 44, leave out “must” and insert “may, if the individual so chooses,”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

16A

Because the Commons consider it appropriate that a person applying for a designated

 

document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an

 

ID Card issued to him

 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 16 and 22 for the following Reason—

16B

Because the Lords consider it inappropriate that a person applying for a designated

 

document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an

 

ID Card issued to him

 

COMMONS INSISTENCE AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments 16 and 22 but propose

 

Amendment 22C in lieu

 
 
HL Bill 92—I54/1

 
 

Identity Cards Bill

2

 
 

lords insistence, disagreement and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 16 and 22 and disagree to Amendment 22C

 

proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—

16C

Because the Lords consider it inappropriate that a person applying for a designated

 

document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an

 

ID Card issued to him.

 

COMMONS INSISTENCE AND AMENDMENTS IN lIEU

 

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments 16 and 22 but propose

 

Amendments 22E and 22F in lieu

 

lords non-insistence, disagreement and amendments in lieu

 

The Lords do not insist on their Amendments 16 and 22, in respect of which the Commons

 

have insisted on their disagreement, do disagree with the Commons in their Amendments

 

22E and 22F in lieu, and do propose Amendments 22G and 22H in lieu

Clause 8

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 22

22

Page 7, line 42, leave out “must” and insert “may, if the individual so chooses,”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

22A

Because the Commons consider it appropriate that a person applying for a designated

 

document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an

 

ID Card issued to him

 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 16 and 22 for the following Reason—

22B

Because the Lords consider it inappropriate that a person applying for a designated

 

document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an

 

ID Card issued to him

 

COMMONS INSISTENCE AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments 16 and 22 but propose

 

Amendment 22C in lieu

22C

Page 4, line 45, after “include” insert “or be accompanied by”

 

lords insistence, disagreement and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 16 and 22 and disagree to Amendment 22C

 

proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—


 
 

Identity Cards Bill

3

22D

Because the Lords consider it inappropriate that a person applying for a designated

 

document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an

 

ID Card issued to him.

 

COMMONS INSISTENCE AND AMENDMENTS IN lIEU

 

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments 16 and 22 but propose

 

Amendments 22E and 22F in lieu

22E

Page 7      , line 38, after “accompanies” insert “or includes”

22F

Page 7      , line 43, leave out from “manner” to the end and insert “ensure that an

 

application to be issued with such a card accompanies or is included”

 

lords non-insistence, disagreement and amendments in lieu

 

The Lords do not insist on their Amendments 16 and 22, in respect of which the Commons

 

have insisted on their disagreement, do disagree with the Commons in their Amendments

 

22E and 22F in lieu, and do propose Amendments 22G and 22H in lieu—

22G

Page 4, line 44, after “individual” insert “and is made on or before 31st December

 

2011, that application may, if the individual so chooses, include an application by

 

that individual to be entered in the Register.

 

(2A)    

Where an application to be issued with a designated document is made by

 

an individual and is made after 31st December 2011,”

 

commons disagreement and reason

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

22GA

Because the Commons do not consider it appropriate to delay until 1st January 2012 the

 

commencement of the rule that a person applying for a designated document must at the

 

same time apply to be entered in the Register and to have an ID Card issued to him

 

lords non-insistence, disagreement and amendments in lieu

 

The Lords do not insist on their Amendments 16 and 22, in respect of which the Commons

 

have insisted on their disagreement, do disagree with the Commons in their Amendments

 

22E and 22F in lieu, and do propose Amendments 22G and 22H in lieu—

22H

Page 7, line 42, leave out from “card” to end of line 2 on page 8 and insert “may, if

 

the individual so chooses, in the prescribed manner, include an application to be

 

issued with such a card in any application made by him to be issued with a

 

designated document, where that application is made on or before 31st December

 

2011.

 

(7A)    

An individual who is not already the holder of an ID card must, in the

 

prescribed manner, include an application to be issued with such a card in

 

any application made by him to be issued with a designated document,

 

where that application is made after 31st December 2011.”

 

commons disagreement and reason

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

22I

Because the Commons do not consider it appropriate to delay until 1st January 2012 the


 
 

Identity Cards Bill

4

 
 

commencement of the rule that a person applying for a designated document must at the

 

same time apply to be entered in the Register and to have an ID Card issued to him

 

MOTION A

A

The Baroness Scotland of Asthal to move, That this House do not insist

 

on its Amendments 22G and 22H in lieu to which the Commons have dis­

 

agreed for their Reasons 22GA and 22I.

A1

The Lord Armstrong of Ilminster to move, as an amendment to Motion A,

 

at end insert “but do propose Amendments 22J and 22K in lieu”.

Clause 5

22J

Page 4, line 44, leave out from “individual” to end of line 4 on page 5 and insert—

 

“(a)    

if the individual is not already entered in the Register, his

 

application for a designated document must include or be

 

accompanied by an application by that individual to be entered in

 

the Register unless he has stated in or with his application for a

 

designated document that he does not wish to apply to be entered

 

in the Register;

 

(b)    

if the individual is already entered in the Register, his application

 

for a designated document must either state that he is already

 

entered in the Register and confirm the contents of his entry or state

 

that he is entered in the Register and confirm the contents of his

 

entry subject to the changes notified in the application.”

Clause 8

22K

Page 8, line 2, after “document” insert “in which he has not included or which is

 

not accompanied by a statement in accordance with section 5(2) that he does not

 

wish to be entered in the Register”


 
contents
 
House of Lords home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 28 March 2006