|Previous Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|
How many residents and tenants' groups and non-governmental organisations have expressed opposition to the Pathfinder programme; what are those groups and organisations; and on what grounds the Ancient Monuments Society, English Heritage, the Victorian Society, the Council for British Archaeology, the Heritage Trust for the Northwest, Save Britain's Heritage and the Prince's Trust opposed Pathfinder projects. [HL340]
Baroness Andrews: To date, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has received five ministerial letters from residents via their MP and one from a non-governmental body, the Merseyside Civic Trust, opposing the housing market renewal programme. In other correspondence we have received approximately 25 letters and e-mails voicing similar opposition or concerns. One of these letters was from the Spital Hill Local Voice group based in Sheffield.
The Ancient Monuments Society, the Victorian Society, the Council for British Archaeology, the Heritage Trust for the Northwest and the Prince's Trust have not expressed a formal view to the Government on the HMR programme. Save Britain's Heritage gave evidence in the recent Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Select Committee on Empty Homes and Low Demand Pathfinders, which can be found at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmodpm/295/295we02.htm. The Government will be responding to this report shortly.
English Heritage has recently produced a policy position statement on housing market renewal in which it recommended that Pathfinders should undertake an assessment of the historic environment to help to inform the regeneration of their areas. The Government agree with this. English Heritage accepts that a reduction of the housing stock is necessary and that some demolition is inevitable.
Whether decisions to proceed with the demolition of properties were arrived at on the basis of a drive-by survey or some other criteria; and whether they intend to publish, under the provisions of the Environmental Impact Regulations, the basis on which individual streets and individual homes have been listed for compulsory acquisition and demolition. [HL355]
Baroness Andrews: Decisions about which property to compulsorily purchase, demolish, refurbish or leave are not taken by government, unless they are "called in" via the planning process. They are instead the responsibility of the local authority concerned as the statutory body, informed by the Pathfinder strategy.
Plans for different types of intervention, including decisions to proceed with demolition of properties, are not taken on the basis of simple drive-by surveys. They are informed by various factors, including neighbourhood renewal assessment (or other similar comprehensive assessment), community views, analyses of supply and demand, housing stock condition, demographics
22 Jun 2005 : Column WA176
and wider strategies (at local authority, sub-regional and regional level) for the economic and social future of the places covered by Pathfinders.
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister does not publish as a matter of course information regarding particular houses and streets affected by Pathfinders. Individual Pathfinders are expected to do so (for instance, in the form of draft area development frameworks) to inform consultation and community involvement and as part of the normal local authority decision taking and statutory planning process where relevant.
Baroness Andrews: A dwelling is statutorily unfit if, in the opinion of the local housing authority, it fails under the criteria set out in Section 604 of the Housing Act 1985 and by reason of that failure is not reasonably suitable for occupation. The authority has a duty to take the most satisfactory course of action in relation to unfit dwellings. The provisions in the Housing Act 1985 enable authorities to acquire statutorily unfit property either through agreement or by compulsory purchase.
Further to the Written Answer by the Baroness Andrews on 7 June (WA 55), whether they will issue guidance encouraging local authorities to require planning gain as a condition of planning approval for properties for market sale to be built on sites acquired by English Partnerships under its London-wide initiative. [HL421]
Baroness Andrews: Development undertaken on London-wide initiative sites will be subject to the normal planning regime. Current policy on the application of planning obligations as set out in DoE Circular 1/97 makes no distinction between public and private sector developers. This is because the same planning requirements for the mitigation of impacts relate to all types of development.
Further to the Written Answer by the Baroness Andrews on 7 June (WA 55), how many of the 2,000 affordable homes for sale to key workers and first time buyers under the London-wide initiative will be in (a) conventional shared ownership; and (b) other forms of low cost home ownership. [HL422]
Baroness Andrews: Work is continuing between English Partnerships and its development partners and the relevant local authorities on the total number and mix of units on each site to be developed under the London-wide initiative. The London-wide homes will be shared equity homes for eligible groups, such as key workers and first-time buyers.
How many social rented housing units they expect to be built on the 96 surplus National Health Service sites recently made available by English Partnerships for the First Time Buyers Initiative. [HL423]
Baroness Andrews: The first tranche of 67 surplus hospital sites transferred from the Department of Health to English Partnerships on 6 April 2005. Other sites will transfer to English Partnerships. The land will be used to help to deliver growth and regeneration including the provision of more affordable homes. English Partnerships is now working up future plans for the sites.
Residential housing development will take place where sites are assessed as suitable. The provision of mixed-tenure housing development will tackle the problem of housing shortages and the demand for affordable homes for key workers and first-time buyers. Where it is appropriate for residential development to take place on a site, regional strategies and local development plans should include provision for social rented housing. The amount of social rented housing will be a matter for discussion with the relevant local planning authority taking account of local needs.
Baroness Andrews: English Partnerships published its first quarterly report on the register of surplus public sector land in March 2005. A copy of the report was placed in the Library of the House. An updated report on the register is expected to be published in June 2005. Following publication the report will be available on English Partnership's website.
Baroness Andrews: The date of contract award depends upon the outcome of the evaluation of the bids from potential suppliers and will reflect the suppliers' proposals. It is important that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister secures a contract that meets the needs of the fire and rescue services and provides value for money for the taxpayer. Contract award is expected to be in the autumn.
|Next Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|