HOUSE OF LORDS
|
SESSION 2005-06
[2006]
UKHL 10
on appeal from: [2004] EWCA Civ 926
and [2005] EWCA Civ 289
|
OPINIONS
OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL
for judgment IN THE CAUSE
|
Kay and
others and another (FC) (Appellants) v.
London Borough of Lambeth and others (Respondents)
Leeds City
Council (Respondents) v. Price and
others and others (FC) (Appellants)
|
Appellate
Committee
Lord Bingham of Cornhill
Lord Nicholls Of Birkenhead
Lord Hope of Craighead
Lord Scott of Foscote
Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
Baroness Hale of Richmond
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood
|
Counsel
|
Appellants:
Jan Luba QC
David Watkinson
Kelvin Rutledge
Alex Offer
(Instructed by Davies Gore Lomax for the Leeds
appellants, and Nicholas & Co and Thomas & Co for the Lambeth
appellants)
|
Respondents:
London
Borough of Lambeth
Andrew Arden QC
Terence Gallivan
John McCafferty
(Instructed by Devonshires)
Leeds City
Council
Ashley Underwood QC
Thomas Tyson
(Instructed by Leeds City Council)
|
Interveners
Philip Sales and Daniel Stilitz intervening in both
appeals (Instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the First Secretary of State
Written intervention in the second appeal by Justice
and Liberty
|
Hearing dates:
12, 13, 14 and 15 December 2005
|
on
WEDNESDAY 8 march 2006
|
|
|
|