Select Committee on European Union Eleventh Report


CHAPTER 7: The Reform Agenda: Strengthening The United Nations And Its Institutions

92.  In this chapter we draw attention to issues arising from the reform proposals on the UN institutions.

THE SECURITY COUNCIL

93.  Secretary-General Kofi Annan regards overcoming the outdated composition of the Security Council as a central element of any reform of the UN. He has urged that this be decided ahead of the Millennium Review Summit.[115] The Secretary-General referred the international community to the two models for reform presented by the High Level Panel.

94.  Both proposals aim at enlarging the Security Council from its current 15 seats to 24. Model A proposes the creation of 6 new permanent seats, without a veto right, and three new two-year, non-permanent seats. Model B does not provide for any new permanent seats but would create a new category of eight seats for a renewable four-year period as well as one additional non-permanent seat for a non-renewable two-year period.

95.  The Secretary-General urged member states to agree on one of the two models ahead of the Review Summit, arguing that it "would be very preferable for member states to take this vital decision by consensus, but if they are unable to reach consensus this must not become an excuse for postponing action."[116]

96.  The candidates for new permanent seats—the so-called G4 (Germany, Japan, Brazil and India)—have interpreted this appeal as being in support of their position.[117] Mr Sam Daws explained the G4's three-staged strategy. The first stage involves putting a framework proposal to the General Assembly for a vote, probably by 11 July. This proposal would not require any amendment of the UN Charter, but it would be a general resolution for proceeding with Model A for the enlargement of the Security Council. If the G4 is successful in achieving a vote by two-thirds of the membership on the initial resolution, they would proceed to a secret ballot to name the permanent members. Only if there were a successful secret ballot would the G4 move, probably after the Review Summit, to a formal vote in the General Assembly thereby beginning the process of charter amendment.[118]

97.  Those in support of Model B—including Italy, Mexico, South Korea, and Pakistan—stress the need to arrive at a decision by consensus in the General Assembly and oppose the creation of new permanent members.

98.  The United Kingdom supports the G4 campaign (along with both permanent and non-permanent representation for Africa) and has indicated that it will vote for the G4's resolution when it comes to the General Assembly. The British Government is in the process of deciding whether to co-sponsor the G4 resolution, as the French have agreed to do.

99.  European Union consensus on Security Council reform has long been absent.[119] Given the competing ambitions of Italy and Germany Mr Sam Daws thinks EU consensus is unlikely to be found "until the competing models have been put to a test in the General Assembly in a vote."[120]

100.  While there is little doubt that the enlargement of the Security Council is the most politicised and the most headline-worthy issue on the reform agenda,[121] and while successful reform of the Security Council would add momentum to the rest of the agenda,[122] what is perhaps more likely is that "reform of the Security Council will take up time and cut across the need for political cohesion in other parts of the agenda," as Sir Jeremy Greenstock predicted.[123]

101.  The EU needs to do what it can to prevent disagreements over enlargement of the Security Council overshadowing the rest of the reform agenda. On this point we note the Minister for Europe's optimistic assessment: "I think the success of finding a common voice on many of these issues …, notwithstanding the fact that there is genuine disagreement among certain European Union states as to the way forward on membership of the Security Council, offers a good exemplar and should offer hope in terms of the Millennium Review Summit more generally."[124]

102.  The Government must do all it can to ensure that the issue of Security Council reform does not overwhelm all the other important aspects of this Summit.

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY [UNGA]

103.  The Secretary-General affirmed in his "In Larger Freedom" Report that "the General Assembly has a central position as the chief deliberative, policy-making and representative organ of the United Nations." However, he went on to note that there has been a decline in its prestige and in its contribution to the UN's activities: the increasing number of UNGA resolutions "simply reflects the lowest common denominator of widely different opinions" with generalities being forthcoming instead of any serious action. [One of the main reasons given for this decline is the means by which consensus is achieved: first through regional groupings and then within the Assembly as a whole]. Our witnesses agreed that the General Assembly is "very ineffective"[125] but gave no views on the proposals for reform.

104.  The Secretary-General's Report contains three proposals:

  • the UNGA should rationalise its work and speed up the deliberative process as well as strengthening the role and authority of its President;
  • it should give focus on its substantive agenda by concentrating on addressing the major substantive issues of the day; and
  • it should establish mechanisms enabling it to engage fully and systematically with civil society.

105.  Since 2000 there have been a number of UNGA resolutions designed to enhance the authority and role of the General Assembly both reviewing its agenda and its working practices.[126] The Ping draft-outcome document calls for the "full and speedy implementation" of these measures. However, neither the United Kingdom nor the EU consider reform of the Assembly as a priority for the Review Summit.

106.  We call for the Government to state how it believes the UN General Assembly can be revitalised and to work towards the reforms proposed by the Secretary-General.

THE UNITED NATIONS SECRETARIAT

107.  The Secretary-General's Report is also openly critical of problems within the UN administrative machinery arguing that: "If the United Nations is to be truly effective the Secretariat will have to be completely transformed."[127] Though they have existed for some time, these problems were brought to international attention by the mismanagement of the Iraqi food-for-oil programme. UN administrative reform has thus become an urgent issue on the Review Summit agenda. The Secretary-General therefore asked for:

  • a review of all mandates older than five years to see whether the activities concerned are still genuinely needed;
  • the authority and resources to pursue a one-time staff buyout so as to refresh and realign the staff to meet current needs;
  • a comprehensive review of the budget and human resources; and
  • a comprehensive review of the Office of Internal Oversight Services with a view to strengthening its independence and authority as well as its expertise and capacity.[128]

108.  Mr Sam Daws welcomed these proposals saying, "I very much hope we will see progress on the reform and strengthening of the UN Secretariat, including the buy-out package that the Secretary General has asked for, a one-off buy-out package to get rid of dead wood in the Secretariat, and also giving him greater freedom on the budget and on the human resources side."[129]

109.  Reform is supported by the EU and is one of the United Kingdom Government's priorities for the Review Summit. On the basis of the Ping draft-outcome document, agreement on reform appears to be likely. We agree that reform of the UN Secretariat to make it more effective and accountable is both necessary and urgent. The Government should press for the acceptance by all UN member states of the Secretary-General's reform package.

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL (ECOSOC)

110.  The UN Charter gives ECOSOC a range of important functions that involve co-ordination, policy review and policy dialogue. It ought, according to "In Larger Freedom" be a "forger of consensus",[130] but it has so far failed to achieve this aim. Mr Sam Daws noted that as it has expanded from 18 to 27 to 54 members it has seen a corresponding reduction in its prestige.[131] The Secretary-General did not attempt to provide reasons for the failures of ECOSOC, but rather addressed those areas in which more work could be done. Its primary task, under his proposed reforms, would be to monitor the implementation of internationally agreed development goals (particularly the MDGs); but it would more generally serve as a high-level development co-operation forum. It would also address issues relating to crisis management and, in conjunction with the proposed Peacebuilding Commission, monitor and deal with the economic and social dimensions of conflicts.[132]

111.  These proposals have been criticised by many. The Council would be upgraded in terms of its development work, but it would continue to have no enforcement powers, and there are fears that focusing on the Council's development work will marginalise its role in other important economic, environmental and social issues.

112.  The United Kingdom Government's position on reform of ECOSOC is inconclusive. The Minister for Europe stated that: "we do believe that as a charter body of the United Nations ECOSOC needs to become a more effective multilateral international institution that meets the kinds of challenges that such an organisation will face and, given the nature of its remit in terms of economic, social, environmental, humanitarian and human rights fields, of course that would involve effective working with other international financial institutions but there is more work that needs to be done on that specific matter."[133] Similarly, the EU supports reform, but does not specify what form it should take.

113.  The Government should make available to Parliament, following the Millennium Review Summit, its analysis of how successful any agreed reforms of ECOSOC are likely to be, and what other reforms might be required in order to render ECOSOC an effective multilateral institution.


115   In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations, March 2005, para 169. Back

116   In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations, March 2005, para 170. Back

117   The other two candidates would come from Africa. Back

118   Q 77. Back

119   The European Parliament's position is that the EU should have a single seat on the enlarged Security Council. This proposal has formed no part of current discussions on the reform of the Security Council. For EU representation at the UN in general see QQ145 and 147 and The Enlarging European Union at the United Nations: Making Multilateralism Matter, European Union, 2004, Chapter 2. Back

120   Q 77. Back

121   Q 106. Back

122   Q 127. Back

123   Q 106. Back

124   Q 142. Back

125   Q 46. Back

126   General Assembly Resolutions 58/126, 58/316 and 55/285. Back

127   In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations, March 2005, para 185. Back

128   In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations, March 2005, paras 187-192. Back

129   Q 76. Back

130   In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations, March 2005, para 172. Back

131   Q 81. Back

132   In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations, March 2005, paras 175-178. Back

133   Q 144. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005