House of Lords portcullis
House of Lords
Session 2006 - 07
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill


 
 

 

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill

commons DISAGREEMENTS AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 19, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

Clause 2

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 2

2

Page 2, line 29, at end insert—

 

“(d)    

a duty owed to anyone held in custody.”

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendment in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10 but propose

 

Amendment 10A in lieu.

 

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 3

3

Page 3, line 12, at end insert—

 

““custody” includes being held in prison, secure mental healthcare

 

facilities, secure children’s homes, secure training centres,

 

immigration removal centres, court cells and police cells, and being

 

subject to supervision by court, prisoner and detainee escort

 

services;”

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendment in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10 but propose

 

Amendment 10A in lieu.

Clause 3

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 5

5

Page 3, line 37, leave out “or (b)” and insert “, (b) or (d)”

 
 
HL Bill 7254/2

 
 

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill

2

 
 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10 but propose

 

Amendment 10A in lieu.

 

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 6

6

Page 3, line 40, leave out “or (b)” and insert “, (b) or (d)”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10 but propose

 

Amendment 10A in lieu.

Clause 5

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 10

10

Page 5, line 8, leave out “or (b)” and insert “, (b) or (d)”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10 but propose

 

Amendment 10A in lieu—

10A

Page 2, line 43, at end insert—

 

“(5A)    

The Secretary of State may by order make amendments to this section to the

 

effect that a duty of care owed by an organisation under the law of

 

negligence to a person who—

 

(a)    

is in any specified form of custody or detention, or is otherwise on

 

premises of a specified description or on premises in specified

 

circumstances, and

 

(b)    

is by reason of that fact a person for whose safety the organisation

 

is responsible,

 

    

is a “relevant duty of care”.

 

(5B)    

An order under subsection (5A)—

 

(a)    

may amend this Act so as to specify exceptions with respect to the

 

application of any provision contained in this section as a result of

 

such an order;

 

(b)    

may make any amendment to this Act that is incidental or

 

supplemental to, or consequential on, an amendment made by such

 

an order.

 

(5C)    

An order under subsection (5A) is subject to affirmative resolution

 

procedure.”


 
contents
 
House of Lords home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Revised 17 May 2007