Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

Further, at the end of 2005, we consulted on proposals to simplify the reimbursement arrangements for NHS dispensing contractors. These included measures designed to further promote patient pack dispensing, such as allowing pharmacists a limited dispensing discretion with regard to the quantity prescribed to be able to dispense a full patient pack on more occasions. We are currently considering how we take this forward in light of responses.



18 Jan 2007 : Column WA183

Health: vCJD

Lord Morris of Manchester asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Minister of State, Department of Health (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): The chairman of the Haemophilia Society wrote to the Secretary of State for Health on 12 December about a number of issues in relation to vCJD and the possible risk of transmission of vCJD to haemophilia patients through treatment. Officials are preparing a comprehensive response which will set out government action and developments in relation to vCJD. We will send a copy of the response to the noble Lord.

Immigration: Children

Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Skills (Lord Adonis): The table below shows the number of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who started to be looked after during each of the years ending 31 March 2004 to 2006. Other non-British children who are taken into care are not separately identifiable in nationally collected data.



18 Jan 2007 : Column WA184



18 Jan 2007 : Column WA185



18 Jan 2007 : Column WA186



18 Jan 2007 : Column WA187

Unaccompanied asylum seeking children who started to be looked after during years ending 31 March 2004, 2005 and 2006 1, 2
numbers
200420052006

England

1,600

1,800

2,100

North-east

10

20

10

Shire counties

Durham

0

0

-

Northumberland

0

0

0

Unitary authorities

Darlington

0

0

0

Hartlepool

0

0

0

Middlesbrough

0

0

0

Redcar & Cleveland

0

0

0

Stockton on Tees

-

-

-

Metropolitan Districts

Gateshead

0

0

0

Newcastle upon Tyne

-

15

0

North Tyneside

-

-

-

South Tyneside

0

0

-

Sunderland

0

0

0

North-west

50

70

150

Shire counties

Cheshire

0

0

0

Cumbria

0

0

0

Lancashire

0

0

0

Unitary authorities

Blackburn & Darwen

0

0

0

Blackpool

0

0

-

Halton

0

0

0

Warrington

0

0

0

Metropolitan Districts

Bolton

-

5

-

Bury

-

-

15

Knowsley

0

0

0

Liverpool

-

10

25

Manchester

40

40

90

Oldham

-

0

0

Rochdale

-

-

0

Salford

-

-

-

Sefton

0

0

0

St Helens

0

0

0

Stockport

-

0

-

Tameside

-

0

-

Trafford

0

0

0

Wigan

-

-

-

Wirral

0

0

-

Yorkshire & The Humber

40

70

40

Shire counties

North Yorkshire

-

0

-

Unitary authorities

East Riding Yorkshire

-

-

-

Kingston upon Hull

0

-

0

North-east Lincolnshire

-

-

0

North Lincolnshire

0

-

-

York

0

0

0

Metropolitan Districts

Barnsley

0

-

0

Bradford

0

-

0

Calderdale

-

-

0

Doncaster

-

0

0

Kirklees

-

0

0

Leeds

-

15

Rotherham

-

-

-

Sheffield

20

30

20

Wakefield

0

-

-

East Midlands

30

20

30

Shire Counties

Derbyshire

0

-

-

Leicestershire

-

-

15

Lincolnshire

0

-

-

Northamptonshire

5

-

-

Nottinghamshire

-

-

-

Unitary authorities

Derby

5

-

-

Leicester

10

-

-

Nottingham

0

-

-

Rutland

0

0

0

West Midlands

50

90

160

Shire counties

Shropshire

-

-

-

Staffordshire

-

10

15

Warwickshire

-

10

10

Worcestershire

0

-

-

Unitary authorities

Herefordshire

0

0

0

Stoke-on-Trent

0

0

0

Telford & Wrekin

0

0

0

Metropolitan Districts

Birmingham

10

40

90

Coventry

-

-

-

Dudley

0

0

0

Sandwell

0

-

-

Solihull

30

30

35

Walsall

0

-

-

Wolverhampton

-

0

0

East of England

70

90

140

Shire counties

Bedfordshire

-

-

-

Cambridgeshire

-

25

90

Essex

5

15

5

Hertfordshire

-

-

5

Norfolk

10

10

20

Suffolk

0

0

0

Unitary Authorities

Luton

10

10

-

Peterborough

5

25

-

Southend

0

0

0

Thurrock

25

-

-

London

1,000

1,000

1,100

Inner London

390

320

340

Camden

15

20

5

City of London

10

20

10

Greenwich

30

15

40

Hackney

10

10

0

Hammersmith & Fulham

55

50

30

Islington

30

30

20

Kensington & Chelsea

35

30

25

Lambeth

30

25

105

Lewisham

75

30

15

Southwark

50

30

20

Tower Hamlets

10

30

20

Wandsworth

5

-

-

Westminster

40

30

40

Outer London

630

700

770

Barking & Dagenham

20

40

40

Barnet

15

45

20

Bexley

-

20

15

Brent

20

35

30

Bromley

5

10

15

Croydon

145

170

240

Ealing

-

30

35

Enfield

5

0

0

Haringey

55

90

55

Harrow.

5

10

25

Havering

-

-

-

Hillingdon

145

115

195

Hounslow

15

55

45

Kingston upon Thames

60

30

25

Merton

15

-

-

Newham

45

20

10

Redbridge

15

20

5

Richmond upon Thames

-

-

0

Sutton

0

0

-

Waltham Forest

50

10

15

South-east

310

380

470

Shire Counties

Buckinghamshire

-

-

-

East Sussex

-

-

-

Hampshire

-

15

15

Kent

160

215

270

Oxfordshire

30

40

40

Surrey

5

30

35

West Sussex

75

40

50

Unitary authorities

Bracknell Forest

0

-

0

Brighton & Hove

-

-

20

Isle of Wight

0

0

0

Medway Towns

0

0

0

Milton Keynes

0

0

0

Portsmouth

0

0

Reading

5

5

10

Slough

10

10

10

Southampton

-

-

0

West Berkshire

10

20

10

Windsor & Maidenhead

0

-

-

Wokingham

0

0

South-west

20

30

20

Shire counties

Cornwall

0

0

0

Devon

0

-

0

Dorset

0

0

0

Gloucestershire

-

0

-

Isles Of Scilly

0

0

0

Somerset

-

0

0

Wiltshire

-

-

-

Unitary authorities

Bath & North-east Somerset

0

0

0

Bournemouth

-

0

0

Bristol

-

-

-

North Somerset

-

-

-

Plymouth

5

5

-

Poole

0

0

-

South Gloucestershire

0

0

0

Swindon

0

20

10

Torbay

0

0

0

1Source: DfES, SSDA903 return which since 2004 covered all children looked after by local authorities.
2 To maintain the confidentiality of each individual child, numbers at local authority level have been rounded to the nearest five, except numbers from one to five inclusive, which have been suppressed and replaced by a hyphen “-”. At national level, numbers have been rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000 and to the nearest 10 otherwise.

Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bassam of Brighton: While no specific assessment as outlined above has been carried out we have commissioned a review of the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness of dental age assessment techniques. We will carefully consider the findings of this review, which is expected to report by the end of February, before proceeding with any plans to introduce dental analysis as supplementary evidence in assessing age for immigration purposes. An interview with the child or young person and consideration of information submitted will remain important factors in the final decision on their age. We are planning to publish a consultation paper soon on this and other possible reforms in the context of processing applications for asylum from unaccompanied minors.

Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Information is not available on how many of those asylum applications lodged in 2006 from unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASCs) have, been age disputed.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page