Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

Lord Rooker: If an individual is unhappy with the way in which a complaint was handled by the Police Ombudsman's office they can refer the matter to the ombudsman, who will have their complaint investigated.

5 Feb 2007 : Column WA99

If a complainant feels there has been maladministration, he can write to the Police Ombudsman's chief executive. If the complainant remains unhappy with the chief executive's response, he can write to the Secretary of State specifying where he believes maladministration has occurred. The Secretary of State can consider complaints only where it is alleged that maladministration has taken place.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: As at 31 March 2006, six serving or retired police officers have been convicted of criminal offences as a result of investigations conducted by the Police Ombudsman.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: Compensation was paid to one member of staff dismissed by the Office of the Police Ombudsman following the judgment of an employment tribunal. The judgment of the tribunal was published on 23 December 2005. A confidentiality clause was imposed restraining the applicant and respondent from publishing details of the settlement.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: No compensation has been paid to members of the public, former or serving members of the Royal Ulster Constabulary GC or the Police Service of Northern Ireland by the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: The information requested is not available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: The Police Ombudsman's annual budget is set at a level to allow the Police Ombudsman to fulfil her legal obligations under Part VII of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 and is not based on numbers of serving officers within the Police Service of Northern Ireland. However, the table below sets out the per capita cost of the total number of serving police officers in Northern Ireland against the budget of the Office of the Police Ombudsman. The comparable budget of the Office of the Police Ombudsman for the current year 2006-07 is £7,923,000.

Year EndingTotal Number of Serving PSNI Officers (including Reserve officers)Budget of Police Ombudsman OfficePer Capita Cost

March 2006

9,394

£7,550,000

£804

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: The Police Ombudsman’s primary function is to provide a system for handling complaints against the police. The Police Ombudsman advises that the information asked for is not available in the form requested. However, consistent with the previous Answer (WA 107), the ombudsman's annual budget from April 2001 to March 2006 is as follows.

2001-02

£5,815,000

2002-03

£6,838,000

2003-04

£6,925,000

2004-05

£7,410,000

2005-06

£7,550,000



5 Feb 2007 : Column WA101

The Police Ombudsman also advises that during this period 19,000 complaints have been handled by her office. As at end of March 2006, 74 criminal charges have been referred to the PPS and to date 34 have been or are being directed by the director. In those cases concluded, six police officers have been convicted of criminal offences.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: The information requested is not available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: Inquiries relating to cases conducted under the independent investigatory powers and statutory functions of the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland should be pursued directly with the ombudsman.

Prisoners: Electronic Data Capture

Baroness Anelay of St Johns asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Scotland of Asthal): The C-NOMIS programme ensures a continuous cycle of data quality reporting on legacy systems that starts at least 20 weeks before site (prison establishment or probation area) implementation. Sites are required to “cleanse” the data and ensure accuracy before migration to the new system. This is monitored by the project and data quality metrics are produced

5 Feb 2007 : Column WA102

every two weeks. High-level data-quality standards have been reviewed and approved for enforcement by senior business leads. All serious data quality issues are corrected prior to site implementation.

Prisons: Chelmsford

Baroness Stern asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Scotland of Asthal): Prisoners with severe mental health problems should be transferred and treated in hospital whenever possible. To help facilitate quicker transfers, a protocol has been issued setting out what must be done when a prisoner has been waiting for a hospital place for more than three months following acceptance by the NHS. Tighter monitoring has also been introduced to identify prisoners waiting an unacceptably long period for transfer.

In 2005, 24 per cent more prisoners with mental illness too severe for prison were transferred to hospital than in 2002—up to 896 from 722. In the quarter ending September 2006, 43 prisoners had been waiting over 12 weeks for a transfer, down from 58 in the same quarter in 2005.

We are looking to further reduce the national waiting time standard for transfers between custodial settings and hospitals and pilots of a 14-day maximum wait will take place in 14 mental health trusts this year. A protocol specific to the transfer to hospital of young people in the secure estate with severe mental illness is also being developed.

Baroness Stern asked Her Majesty's Government:

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: Mental health services for prisoners have been a key part of the Government's recent reforms of health services for prisoners. The Department of Health is now investing nearly £20 million a year in NHS mental health in-reach services for prisoners. These are community mental health teams working within prisons and are now available in 102 prisons, with some 360 extra staff employed. Every prison in England and Wales has access to these services.

A new commissioning framework, developed on behalf of the Department of Health, the Home Office, the Youth Justice Board and the Department for Education and Skills is shortly due to be issued setting out best practice guidelines for commissioning child and adolescent mental health services for children in secure establishments, including young offender institutions.



5 Feb 2007 : Column WA103

Prisons: C-NOMIS

Baroness Anelay of St Johns asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Scotland of Asthal): The cost of preparing for the implementation of the C-NOMIS system at HMP Albany includes all costs (supplier and internal costs) associated with the application development and implementation incurred to-date. (Please see attached table.)

Currently, the estimate for the total set-up and implementation costs across the prison and probation management systems is being revisited. The estimate will be prepared once development and implementation plans have been finalised and approved by the C-NOMIS programme board and in the light of emerging feedback from implementation at HMP Albany.

The business case estimate of project cost is £99 million (excluding annual charges of £9 million per annum, which includes increased wide area network, hardware and software maintenance, first, second and third line post-implementation support and so on). The costs excluded sunk costs of £16.7 million to the end of June 2005 (used to produce a prototype, technical designs and contracts). The estimated full life cost (over 14 years) is £234 million (including support and technical refreshes), which equates to about £240 per member of staff per annum. The estimated costs include licensing the preferred COTS package, design and development of the system, user trials, data migration, implementation, training and ongoing support and maintenance.

Figures exclude VAT and Capital charges2005-062006-07 YTD

Total charges

£38,723,655

£30,772,417

Total cost to-date

£69,496,072

Republic of Ireland: National Development Plan

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: The development of the Irish national development plan was entirely a matter for the Irish Government, although Northern Ireland Ministers and officials were kept abreast of their thinking as the plan was developed. We are not aware of the amount of funding the chapter entitled “All Island Co-operation” entails for Northern Ireland, but it is highly unlikely to be anything like the €14 billion implied by the noble Lord's Question.

Consultation with local parties would have been a matter for the Irish Government, but I note that Irish officials gave evidence on the matter to the Transitional Assembly’s programme for government sub-group on economic issues on 7 December 2006 and that representatives of all four of the main Northern Ireland political parties were represented.

The relevant part of the plan makes it clear that the Irish Government wish to agree the proposals with the British Government and a restored Northern Ireland Executive so that neither it nor the process by which it was developed will have any bearing on Northern Ireland's constitutional integrity.

Roads: Bus Lanes

Lord Laird asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: The PSNI have confirmed that parking in a bus lane is not a recordable offence and therefore statistics relating to this are not available.

Roads: Dartford Crossing

Lord Hanningfield asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bassam of Brighton: No estimates are available in the form requested.

Lord Hanningfield asked Her Majesty's Government:


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page