Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
My noble friend Lady Massey asked about intergovernmental working. I am glad to be able to tell her that to bring about further improvements following the Green Paper in 2005, we created a new policy team in my department to work closely with the Home Office, the Department for Work and Pensions, the Youth Justice Board and the Learning and Skills Council on reviewing provision. There is now an inter-ministerial group on reducing reoffending, including representation from the Department for Communities and Local Government. In our recent Next Steps document, which was published last December and which I circulated to noble Lords before the debate, we have encouraged childrens trusts, local authorities
8 May 2007 : Column 1354
We are now in the middle of a public consultation on the Next Steps document, which runs until 4 July. It covers all young people in England aged between 10 and 17 who are supervised by the youth justice system, both in custody and in the community, with a particular focus on offenders of compulsory school age. It includes consideration of all three types of secure establishment: young offender institutions, secure training centres, and secure childrens homes. Responses to our consultation will play a key role in how we prioritise the issues and develop policy, and the Government are encouraged by the input from many working in the youth justice and voluntary sectors. In reply to the direct question asked by my noble friend Lady Massey, I can tell her that we are committed to publishing further plans by the end of this year in response to that consultation.
I shall briefly highlight four key areas covered by the Next Steps document, which are of direct relevance to todays debate. First, we are exploring ways of ensuring that custodial regimes are organised to best promote participation in education. For some young people, the structured environment of a custodial institution is conducive to education. For others with poor memories of school, however, other incentives are needed to engage them in learning. In particular, we recognise the high incidence of special educational needs among young offenders. Issues under consideration include the prompt sharing of information from existing SEN statements, and ensuring that the additional support identified in those statements is provided in youth custody.
Secondly, as the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, rightly highlighted, we need a curriculum that is well suited to the needs of young offenders. Programmes should make teaching basic literacy and numeracy a priority, but they must also go on to equip young people with wider skillsincluding PSHE, social skills, and relationship skills, which the noble Earl, Lord Listowel, mentionedwhich young people need both to apply for jobs and to become better citizens when they leave their custodial settings. This means identifying the means to provide consistent learning programmes across the secure estate, as transfers between establishments are sometimes unavoidable, and spanning the period before and after custody. It also requires the recognition that many young offenders in custody do not respond well to a traditional classroom environment. We are therefore considering how the current reforms to the 14-to-19 curriculum, including the introduction of new vocational diplomas, can be applied to young offenders. The transition from custody back to community is an especially critical point for young people. The supervision and support provided in custody must
8 May 2007 : Column 1355
The third area to highlight is workforce development, rightly mentioned by the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia, the noble Earl, Lord Listowel, and my noble friend Lady Gibson. A set of questions and points were raised in the contributions and I will respond to them in writing. Suffice it to say that we recognise the need for considerably greater attention to workforce development in this area.
The fourth area that we are examining is the accountability framework for custodial education. During the Committee stage of the Education and Inspections Bill, some noble Lords argued that local authorities should have greater responsibility in this area; we are looking at this issue.
I hope I have been able to demonstrate the extreme seriousness with which we and the Youth Justice Board take this issue. When we say every child matters, that includes every child in custody. We will continue to improve the educational welfare of young offenders. We are very grateful for all the comments made in todays debate; I hope that they will help us to forge better policy in this area.
Further consideration of amendments on Report resumed on Schedule 16.
[Amendment No. 446ZA not moved.]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs (Baroness Ashton of Upholland) moved Amendments Nos. 446A to 467:
(a) the solicitors clients, other persons or trusts, generally, or(b) that client, person or trust, separately.(1) The Society may make rules concerning the grant of compensation by the Society in respect of loss that a person has suffered, or is likely to suffer, as a result of
(4) For the purposes of subsection (2)(f), there is a deficiency if the monies mentioned in that subsection are insufficient to satisfy the claims of all persons with a beneficial interest in the monies.
(5) The Society may prepare and publish guidance as to the criteria it will apply in deciding whether to make a grant in respect of a compensation claim, or any part of a compensation claim.
(7) Rules under subsection (1) which are not regulatory arrangements within the meaning of the Legal Services Act 2007 are to be treated as such arrangements for the purposes of that Act.
(1) Compensation rules may require or authorise the Society to establish or maintain a fund or funds (compensation funds) for the purpose of making grants in respect of compensation claims.
(2) Compensation rules may require solicitors, or solicitors of a description prescribed in the rules, to make contributions to compensation funds of such amounts, at such times and in such circumstances, as may be prescribed in or determined in accordance with the rules.
(3) Any amount payable by virtue of such a requirement may be recovered as a debt due to the Society.
(5) The Society may invest any money which forms part of a compensation fund in any investments in which trustees may invest under the general power of investment in section 3 of the Trustee Act 2000 (as restricted by sections 4 and 5 of that Act).
(6) The Society may insure with authorised insurers, in relation to compensation funds, for such purposes and on such terms as it considers appropriate.
(7) The Society may, in such circumstances and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed in or determined in accordance with compensation rules
(8) A compensation fund may be applied by the Society for the purposes mentioned in subsection (9) (in addition to the making of grants in respect of compensation claims).
In relation to an appeal under subsection (3) the High Court may make such order as it thinks fit as to payment of costs.
(2A) The Society may make regulations prescribing charges to be paid to the Society by persons who are the subject of an investigation by the Society as to whether there are grounds for the Society
(2C) Any charge which a person is required to pay under regulations under subsection (2A) is recoverable by the Society as a debt due to the Society from the person.
Schedule 16, page 230, line 41, leave out from body to end of line 48 and insert has the same meaning as it has in relation to a body in the Legal Services Act 2007 (see section 197 of that Act);
Schedule 16, page 231, line 14, leave out section 71 of the Legal Services Act 2007 and insert Part 5 of the Legal Services Act 2007 (see sections 71 and 107 of that Act)
recognised body means a body recognised under section 9 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985;
On Question, amendments agreed to.
[Amendment No. 467A not moved.]
Baroness Ashton of Upholland moved Amendments Nos. 468 to 492A:
(5A) The Tribunal may do anything calculated to facilitate, or incidental or conducive to, the carrying out of any of its functions.
In section 48 (orders of Tribunal), in subsection (3) for Subject to section 43(5), any substitute Any.
( ) In subsection (2), after (3) insert and to section 43(5) of the Administration of Justice Act 1985.
( ) In subsection (3) for legal aid work (within the meaning of that section) substitute providing representation funded by the Legal Services Commission as part of the Criminal Defence Service.
Schedule 16, page 234, line 4, leave out from for to end of line 5 and insert (the Secretary of State to think fit substitute (the Lord Chancellor being one), may make general orders prescribing the general principles to be applied when determining.
Next Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |