Select Committee on Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Fifth Report


Proposal for the Draft Regulatory Reform (Game) Order 2007

Introduction

84.  This is a "first stage" proposal laid before Parliament on 11 December 2006 under section 6 of the Regulatory Reform Act 2001. An explanatory statement by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has been laid with the proposal in accordance with section 6(2) of that Act[4].

85.  The purpose of this proposal is to abolish game licences and game dealing licences and to remove restrictions on dealing in game birds and venison during the close season. Each element is removing or reducing a burden no longer considered desirable.

86.  The 19th century Game Acts were intended to ensure that game was not killed during breeding seasons and to prevent poaching and the sale of illegally killed game. They did this in part by providing for licences to take, kill or deal in game and by prohibiting the sale of game in the close season. Refrigeration and freezing have made the latter provision an anachronism. The licensing provisions are no longer considered effective or necessary. Together, they will be replaced with an offence of selling or possessing a game bird that is known, or believed, to have been killed or taken illegally. The proposal would:

  •   remove the requirement to hold a game licence in order to take or kill game; [Article 2]
  •   remove the requirement to hold a local authority licence and an excise licence (dealing licences) in order to deal in game; [Article 3] and
  •   remove the restrictions on dealing in game birds and venison during the close season, permitting game to be sold by everyone all year round provided that the animal in question was lawfully killed. [Article 4]

Tests in the Regulatory Reform Act 2001

87.  We are satisfied that, for each of the elements of this proposal, the requirements of the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 have been met.

Other tests

88.  The proposed order is neither large (18 Articles), nor does its subject matter appear controversial within the definition which we set out in our 18th Report (2004-05). We note that the consultation exercise consulted on a broader range of proposals than contained in this RRO. Some of that broader category proved controversial, e.g. a relaxation of the rules on Sunday and Christmas Day shooting. Those proposals are not included in this RRO.

Conclusion

89.  We consider that the proposal for the draft Regulatory Reform (Game) Order 2007 meets the requirements of the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 and is appropriate to be made under it.


4   Members of the House may obtain both the proposal and explanatory statement from the Printed Paper Office. Both documents are also available at:

www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/regulation/reform/orders/proposals.asp Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007