Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 79)

WEDNESDAY 10 JANUARY 2007

MR RUDY VOLDERS AND MR YANNIC HULOT

  Q60  Lord Watson of Richmond: It is less.

  Mr Hulot: Yes. The reason we know was there was the First Curacao bank which closed and on the Dubai route everybody had an account in this bank.

  Q61  Chairman: The bank was in Curacao, not Dubai.

  Mr Hulot: Yes, Curacao.

  Q62  Chairman: One in Dubai as well?

  Mr Hulot: Yes, but it was for the fraud that we call the "Dubai route". It was the Dubai route but—

  Q63  Chairman: It was banked in Curacao.

  Mr Hulot: The accounts were offshore in Curacao. This fraud disappeared in September. In the study the Dubai route represented 66 per cent of the fraud in the UK which means these figures have disappeared. We imagine now the fraud in the UK is at least a third less than last year.

  Q64  Chairman: Can I ask who has been providing the Eurocanet figures from the UK?

  Mr Hulot: To evaluate the fraud in a country you do not need the data from the country but you need the data from the other countries and we had the data from all the countries.

  Q65  Chairman: Including the UK?

  Mr Hulot: No. We have a problem with the UK.

  Q66  Chairman: Do tell me, why?

  Mr Hulot: At this moment the Eurocanet network is a very good detection method but for one year we have had no data from the UK, they do not want to participate and we do not know why. The UK is the one that is of more concern and we have contacts but we have no data, no feedback about the missing data. We send the results from all the other countries, they have the results, but the UK do not participate and I do not know why.

  Q67  Chairman: Oh dear.

  Mr Hulot: We have contacts in the Ministry of Finance, we have contacts in CCT and also with the FLO. If you can help us to have good contacts and exchange of information.

  Lord Watson of Richmond: If I may say, this is quite extraordinary. I do not know whether you saw yesterday's Financial Times.

  Chairman: It is one of yours.

  Lord Watson of Richmond: Yes. There is a trader in Britain who has been sentenced to 15 years in prison and his two colleagues seven and a half years each. He is actually, by nationality, French and Belgian but he has been carrying out his fraud in the UK. There is a name given to the person who has been heading the investigation, not just of this but all these investigations, for the Revenue and I am just wondering why you have not had contact with him. He is Mr Chris Harrison, Deputy Director for Investigations at the Revenue. You should contact him. You could ring him up this afternoon.

  Q68  Chairman: But, like you, we have a minister who is fundamentally responsible for fraud, the Paymaster General, but you have not been in contact with her office either?

  Mr Hulot: Yes, but apparently they do not know very much of the project and they fight against fraud but with other methods.

  Mr Volders: They do not believe in the Eurocanet method but that is strange. Is there another country with the UK that is not participating in Eurocanet?

  Mr Hulot: Yes, we also have a problem, a political problem, with Germany.

  Q69  Chairman: That is very interesting.

  Mr Hulot: For the project we had some help from OLAF last year and they do not want to work with OLAF. It is more a political problem. Germany is ready to work on the project without the help of OLAF. They think it is a good project but they had a problem with the participation of OLAF in the project.

  Q70  Lord Cobbold: Why do they have that problem with OLAF?

  Mr Hulot: Apparently it is the sovereignty of fiscal matters and then OLAF. They want to stick with Member States but not with the European Commission about the operation of fighting fraud.

  Q71  Chairman: Yes, I am familiar with that statement of objection.

  Mr Hulot: Perhaps we have the same problem in the UK, I do not know.

  Q72  Chairman: I am just thinking that this could be the case but we must find out because obviously it is in everybody's interests to find out how extensive the fraud is.

  Mr Hulot: For one year we have had no help from OLAF and it is a project only for Member States. If that was the reason it is over now.

  Q73  Lord Watson of Richmond: Is it your understanding then that the British and the Germans are not co-operating but they are not co-operating for different reasons, the Germans are not co-operating because they see this as a sovereignty issue and the British are not co-operating because they do not believe in the methodology of your project?

  Mr Hulot: Perhaps that is the case. You have to know that the project works in 23 countries in the EU and everybody is very interested and have invested in the project. In some countries they have created teams to work in Eurocanet and we have contact points which are working in Eurocanet full-time. It is a very early method of detection. With this method we can detect six months earlier than with other methods.

  Q74  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: I am impressed about this initiative, which I take it originated in this Ministry and is run by this Ministry?

  Mr Hulot: Yes.

  Q75  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: I am less impressed by the report which you have kindly shown us. I am not clear how you can be in a position to make statements like the one on page 33 where you say that the "Dubai route" is exclusively a phenomenon in the United Kingdom. If you have not had working co-operation with the United Kingdom I am not sure how you know of the scale of the Dubai route in the UK, and if you have not had working co-operation from other Member States I do not know how you can state that the Dubai route is exclusively a problem in the United Kingdom. I take that as an example. I see that you basically decide on the scale of carousel fraud in Member States by making an assumption based on proportions of GDP per Member State, and I see that curiously you put the United Kingdom top of the list followed by France, Spain and then Sweden. I am now looking at the league table on page 17 which puts Sweden, far higher up the league-table than Belgium. I am not clear about the basis for any of these statements. It seems to me that it is very good to take an initiative against carousel fraud, but it is dangerous to make statements about the scale of carousel fraud in the United Kingdom without any working link with the United Kingdom authorities, and dangerous to say the Dubai route saying is exclusive to the United Kingdom if you do not have complete coverage across the European Union.

  Mr Volders: That is not our problem. It is a remark. Why? Because it is very hard. We say it is now only in the UK but now we must prove why we made this statement, and Mr Hulot can answer that.

  Mr Hulot: It says that you have a big risk if your country is big and if your reimbursements are abnormal. That is what the figures are saying. It is only that the United Kingdom is a very big country and the reimbursements in proportion are very big. That is only what I am saying there.

  Q76  Chairman: It is a statistical observation?

  Mr Hulot: Yes, it is statistical and macro-economical. In the study there are two approaches, macro-economic and micro-economic.

  Q77  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: Forgive me. Your league-table covers a minority of Member States, not including the largest nor several of the smallest. Cyprus and Malta are not there. Nor is Germany. An EU league-table without Germany is a very odd table.

  Mr Hulot: It is because the data was not available for those countries. That was not published.

  Q78  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: That illustrates my point, if I may say so. I think it is very good to take an initiative, but very dangerous to publish conclusions drawn on the basis of only partial completion of the initiative.

  Mr Hulot: My sources are the World Trade International, an international organisation. I only copied that data in the report. It was very indicative of the size of the country and the level of fraud.

  Q79  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: Why is the United Kingdom discussed throughout this report, although you say there was no co-operation with the United Kingdom, and Germany not discussed anywhere in the report, although you also say there was no co-operation with Germany?

  Mr Volders: He has not found the figures for Germany.

  Mr Hulot: They are not available. They are classified "confidential" in Germany.

  Mr Volders: When we averaged the figures the representative end was bigger but we stayed with the macro-economic analysis based on the figures in Eurocanet and based on the figures from the countries who have published their figures. I think we have a representative study.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007