Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by Construction Confederation

  1.  The Construction Confederation is the main trade association for building and civil engineering contractors in the UK, representing over 5,000 contractors which deliver 75 per cent of total construction turnover.

  2.  The Confederation comprises: British Woodworking Federation, Civil Engineering Contractors Association, Major Contractors Group, National Contractors Federation, National Federation of Builders, Scottish Building.

  3.  The Confederation welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to Sub-Committee G (Social Policy & Consumer Affairs) of the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Union in order to assist the Inquiry into the EU Commission Green Paper "Modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st century".

  4.  In submitting written evidence the Confederation has sought to provide answers both to the questions as detailed in the Call for Evidence and to a number of those featured in the original European Commission Green Paper.

FLEXIBILITY OF THE LABOUR MARKET

5.  How flexible is the labour market in the UK? What could be the benefits of making it more flexible, and how could this be achieved? In which ways, if any, could changes in labour law help with this?

  UK labour protection laws strike an effective balance between flexibility and the protection of the individual. The CC considers that should the European Commission pursue new or additional European-wide labour law proposals, the priority must be to maintain an overall EU framework of legislation that allows national flexibility in transposition into national legislation.

EMPLOYMENT SECURITY

6. What is the extent of employment security in the UK? What could be the benefits of changing the present arrangements for employment security? In which ways, if any, could changes in labour law help with this?

  Existing UK legislation and regulations provide adequate social protection. The last decade has seen a significant increase in employment protection and "family friendly" entitlements, with a marked increase in the range of social protection in such areas as national minimum wage, discrimination, parenting, and business transfers. All of which place additional burdens upon the employer. Security of employment cannot be facilitated by law or collective agreement and is ultimately dependent upon prevailing economic factors in a competitive marketplace.

THE CONCEPT OF "FLEXICURITY"

7.  How helpful do you think is the Commission's concept of "flexicurity" seeking to combine the ideals of a flexible labour market with those of employment security? How practical could it be to strike a balance between these two ideals and where should such a balance be struck? In which ways, if any, could changes in labour law help with this?

  The CC believes that current EU and UK employment legislation strikes the correct balance. There is a danger that the imposition of further employment protection legislation may have a detrimental impact upon employment security with employers seeking new ways to maintain workforce flexibility. For example, taking work outside the European Union, where call-centres are an example.

  8.  The Commission's concept of "flexicurity" is idealistic and likely to create "unintended" effects. Even at the current conceptual stage of potential labour law review, the Commission appears to be taking a one-size-fits-all approach. Given differing traditions and employment cultures across the Member States, the Confederation does not believe it to be practicable to impose an EU-wide definition.

GROUPS COVERED BY LABOUR LAW

9.  To which categories of workers should labour law apply? What is your view of the issues raised by the Green Paper about the applicability of labour law to groups of workers whose employment status is intermediate between that of employee and self-employed?

  Labour laws should apply where a clear "master and servant" relationship exists. Consistency of approach between Government agencies would assist in removing ambiguities in this area. Increasing the burden and complexity of labour law is likely to promote the incidence of ill-defined relationships.

ROLE OF EU REGULATION

10.  What is the role of regulation at the EU-level in achieving a modernised system of labour law? Are there any specific pieces of EU legislation that need either to be repealed or to be introduced? Do you consider that the Green Paper's proposed "Floor of Rights" for all workers is a viable one? In order to promote worker mobility, would a Community-wide definition of "worker" be useful?

  The role of EU regulation must be to maintain an overall framework of employment legislation that allows national flexibility where appropriate. The floor of rights currently operating in the UK is that which is laid down in EU legislation and is satisfactory in dealing with working conditions.

  11.  If the intention of this "Floor of Rights" is to create a legal framework wherein an employer must, for example, provide paid holiday entitlement to a self-employed person providing services then this would have an adverse impact. Models that may suit one member state in respect of such issues may not be suitable for transport into EU wide legislation. These are issues that are best dealt with at national level.

12.  How could minimum requirements concerning the organization of working time be modified in order to provide greater flexibility for both employers and employees, while ensuring a high standard of protection of workers' health and safety? What aspects of the organization of working time should be tackled as a matter of priority by the Community?

  This matter is currently being addressed through the proposed update of the Working Time Directive which seeks to provide flexibility for both employers and employees whilst ensuring a high standard of protection of workers health and safety. The Confederation is keen to maintain the opt-out facility to the 48-hour average working week.

13.  Do you think it is necessary to reinforce administrative co-operation between the relevant authorities to boost their effectiveness in enforcing Community labour law? Do you see a role for social partners in such cooperation?

  Administrative co-operation between relevant authorities is important to ensure effectiveness in enforcing community law. Social dialogue in each member state differs and therefore any role for social partners must be dealt with at national level.

14.  Do you consider that further initiatives are needed at an EU level to support action by the Member States to combat undeclared work?

  Undeclared labour practices are not only illegal but have serious social, economic, health and safety, and reputational consequences for the construction sector. National government has the key role to play in ensuring measures and adequate resources are in place to combat undeclared labour. It is a matter for Member States themselves collectively to decide whether or not further initiatives may be required at the EU level. Should this be the case, it would seem prudent for the national government to consult with and seek input from the national social partners in the construction sector. The Confederation believes that a reduction in VAT on domestic repairs and maintenance work would make a significant contribution to tackling undeclared work and the "black economy". This is an area where cash payments are notorious and the imposition of VAT creates a significant opportunity for those working informally to undercut the legitimate businesses.

CONCLUSION

  15.  The more complex the regulations then the greater the burden of understanding placed upon all parties. Both the EU and national governments need to ensure an acceptable balance in this area. No "one-size will fit all" concerning EU employment legislation. The concept of "flexicurity" is admirable, but as previously stated likely to create unintended detrimental effects.

16 April 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007