Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by the Food Standards Agency

INTRODUCTION

  The role of the Food Standards Agency.

  Responses to questions posed by the Committee that are relevant to the work of the Food Standards Agency.

  A. The Need for a Regulation (questions 1 and 2):

    FSA Role in enforcement of the Regulations.

    Wider role in protecting the consumer, labelling and consumer information.

  C. Structural Measures (questions 7, 8 and 9):

    Illicit planting in the UK.

    Crisis distillation and outlets for excess production.

  D. Marketing (question 12, and 14):

    Current labelling and quality issues.

  E. Wine Making Practices (questions 15 and 16):

    Current regulations and controls.

    Regulation of enrichment of wine.

  F. Environmental and Social Impact (question 17):

    Current data on UK vineyards.

INTRODUCTION

The role of the Food Standards Agency

  1.  The statutory objective of the Food Standards Agency (the Agency) is to protect the health of the public and the other interests of consumers in relation to food and drink.[1] The Agency was set up in April 2000 as a separate Government department, at arm's length from the political process (although accountable to the Westminster Parliament and to devolved equivalents through Health Ministers) and with a clear objective. The independence of the Agency is given effect both by its formal status as a non-Ministerial UK Government Department, led by a Board appointed by UK Ministers to act in the public interest and by its powers to publish the information and advice that it issues, including advice to Ministers.

  2.  We have responsibility for food policy and consumer safety, and therefore this submission concentrates on the enforcement of wine standards legislation and labelling matters.

  3.  The Food Standards Agency's role in relation to labelling is to protect consumer interests in relation to the information on food labels. The Agency's primary objective is to ensure that all food labels are clear and easily understandable in order to help consumers make informed choices, protect public health and enable free trade within the European Union.

  4.  Food labelling is an area of EU competence and therefore national legislation in this area implements the relevant EU legislation. We negotiate on behalf of the UK to ensure that EU legislation in this area addresses the needs of UK consumers and industry.

  5.  The Wine Standards Board (WSB), an executive Non-Departmental Public Body was set up to implement the UK legal obligations under the EU wine regime. As a company, it was sponsored by Defra and the Vintners Company. Following recommendations of the Hampton Report, the work of the WSB transferred to the Food Standards Agency on 1 July 2006.

  6.  The Agency is now responsible for the enforcement of legislation on quality, labelling and standards of wine sold in the UK, whilst the policy functions on industry remain with Defra. The Agency also provides technical advice to Defra on wine making practices and labelling in support of their policy on wine.

  7.  The Food Standards Agency employs a team of wine standards inspectors who are responsible for carrying out enforcement of EU wine labelling rules at bonded warehouses, bottling operations and wholesalers across the UK. Their work also includes maintenance of a register of UK vineyards and recording and checking wine volumes produced, as well as advising vineyards on composition and labelling issues.

  8.  Wines imported into the UK from non-EU countries are subject to import documentation controls giving analytical details and a description of the origin. These are checked by wine standards inspectors for conformity with labelling information.

  9.  Enforcement of wine standards is primarily aimed at protecting consumers through the advice the Agency provides to the wine industry on labelling and composition, and the routine checks carried out by wine standards inspectors. Their work not only has synergy with the Agency's wider food safety standards and labelling activity, but is enhanced by the strong networks with local authority Environmental Health Officers and Trading Standards Officers and wider food labelling and sampling expertise.

  10.  Enforcement of wine labelling at retail level is carried out by local authority Environmental Health Officers and Trading Standards Officers.

  11.  In addition, since consumers need to have confidence that the products they buy are what they claim to be, the Agency is developing expertise on sampling and checking the authenticity and composition of wines with wine standards inspectors in order to protect consumers.

Responses to questions posed by the Committee

  12.  The Agency welcomes the opportunity to provide evidence to this inquiry. We have structured the main part of our evidence around those questions posed by the Committee in its call for evidence that are relevant to our remit.

A.  The Need for a Regulation

Committee Q. 1. What is the nature of the case for having a wine regime at all—ie as distinct from allowing the industry to adjust itself to competitive pressures (eg via increased efficiency, rationalisation, diversification, etc)?

  13.  The Food Standards Agency interest in the wine regime is to ensure that producers meet regulatory requirements, and do not sell unsafe wine or engage in illegal trade practices, and that labelling and compositional standards are met. This will ensure the appropriate level of consumer protection.

Committee Q. 2. Why should wine quality—eg relating to Geographical Indication—be regulated? Why cannot consumers choose between wines as they do between other products—eg on the basis of brand names or other information which might provide a guide to quality?

  14.  The current legislation for labelling of wine within the EU is complex, from both trader compliance and enforcement perspectives. Additionally it may not assist consumers in making an informed choice. Given the diverse market within the EU and the different scales of production, regulation should ensure minimum standards are set for wine quality in order to protect consumers. Consumers want to buy wine in the knowledge that they meet minimum standards for quality, composition and labelling.

  15.  Within the EU there are quality classification systems that give some guidance; a Country Wine (Vin de Pays) ought to be better quality than Table Wine (Vin de Table) because of the wine production laws in place. Wines produced outside the EU are not governed by the same regulation.

  16.  The use of geographical indications in the wine sector is widespread and can certainly represent an asset in an overall food and drink market place in which consumers are increasingly interested in provenance and quality and in information to inform their choice.

  17.  At international level, the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV) set quality and compositional standards in order to facilitate global trade. The Agency believes that EU wine making practices should reflect more closely those approved by the OIV, thereby establishing a baseline that meets international standards. This will allow producers in the EU the maximum opportunity and flexibility to adjust production to meet changing consumer demands.

C.  Structural Measures

Committee Q. 7. How significant an issue is illicit planting for the supply situation?

  18.  Wine standards inspectors have not identified illegal plantings in the UK.

Committee Q. 8. Is there a case for the continuance of remedial measures ("crisis distillation") to deal with exceptional market conditions?

  19.  The UK market is not in surplus and therefore there is no need for crisis distillation in the UK, and hence this is not an enforcement issue. However, other Member States can apply for crisis distillation to the European Commission where market circumstances dictate.

Committee Q. 9. What alternative outlets (ie other than wine sales) exist for excess production?

  20.  The potential outlets for excess production include distillation and sale of industrial alcohol, grape juice and vinegar. But this is not common practice within the UK. Consumer protection is provided through UK legislation (Food Safety Act 1990[2] and Food Labelling Regulations 1996)[3] to ensure that products from excess production (including from other member states) used in food are subject to appropriate controls.

D.  Marketing

Committee Q. 12. Given continuance of an EU wine regime, what are your views on labelling and quality issues? Are current arrangements conducive to consumers understanding of what they are buying? Is there scope for rationalisation and simplification?

  21.  The EU wine legislation (which is the responsibility of Defra) specifies the mandatory information required for labelling of wine from within the EU, and for wine imported from outside the EU. This is additional to the requirements of general food labelling legislation. This information includes alcohol content, quality term approved for the Member State or third country of origin and the region of production.

  22.  In addition wine labels should include statutory declarations relating to allergens. New rules on allergen labelling came into effect in November 2005 and require indications of the allergenic ingredients in foodstuffs, including wine, where sulphur dioxide is required to be declared.

  23.  General food labelling legislation requires food to be marked or labelled with certain requirements such as the name of the food, a list of ingredients, the amount of an ingredient which is named or associated with the food, instructions for use where appropriate and the name of business and manufacturer. Full ingredient listing is not currently required for drinks of more than 1.2% alcohol by volume, so this requirement does not currently apply to wine.

  24.  The European Commission is currently carrying out a review of labelling legislation, and published a consultation document in February 2006. Discussions will cover ingredient listing for alcoholic drinks as well as health warnings on drinks. The UK response in July 2006 to the review supported, in principle, ingredient listing on all alcoholic drinks, but recognised that there are difficulties in the detailed application which need to be worked through (eg for distilled alcohol products) to ensure that requirements are kept simple and proportionate.

  25.  Aspects to be considered in the review include the need for health warnings, which may be relevant to wine labelling (this is a Department of Health lead). This will need to be discussed further with stakeholders, in particular industry and consumers.

  26.  The Commission is now looking at responses from Member States and a wide range of other stakeholders. The earliest a new proposal is expected from the Commission is late 2007.

  27.  The review of the EU Wine Sector may provide an opportunity to streamline the wine regulations and ensure that they facilitate consumer choice and are consistent with the approach proposed to be taken on food labelling generally.

Committee Q. 14. What lessons might be learned from the penetration of non-EU wines into the EU market?

  28.  The UK imports a large quantity and diverse types of wine, making it an unusual market compared with its EU neighbours. Australia is now the major supplier of wine to the UK market, recently overtaking France. Other southern hemisphere producers are also increasing their penetration in northern European countries.

  29.  Wine standards inspectors are carrying out an increasing number of checks on wine imported into the UK from countries outside the EU. New exporting non-EU countries are often unsure of the statutory requirements relating to the import of wine into the EU, and the imports may be rejected. This compares to imports from established wine producers in non-EU countries, where levels of imports reflect better systems for controls on vineyards, wine production and labelling.

E.  Wine Making Practices (WMP)

Committee Q. 15. How suited are current regulations on WMP to a competitive global market in wine? What changes would you like to see?

  30.  Different climates necessitate different wine making practices, and it would not be appropriate to designate one method only.

  31.  Outside the EU wine making practices have become highly developed and very technical (eg ion exchange). These novel processes are not currently permitted in the EU.

  32.  Detecting non-compliant practice is complex, expensive and time consuming. The FSA is aware of new analytical methods to determine authenticity, and other tests are currently under development. However, the constant challenge is to keep up with trade developments and possible fraudulent practices.

  33.  In order to address the competitive challenges being faced by EU producers, there is a case for relaxing some of the present requirements, and allowing a wider use of different methods where there is no detriment to the quality of the wine, or any disadvantage to consumers. Further, it would be a desirable aim for EU member states to press for greater global harmonisation of technical standards via this route.

Committee Q. 16. How should enrichment (with sugar or must) be regulated?

  34.  Enrichment of wines with sugar or grape must (juice) is important in the northern EU countries, which do not receive as much sunshine during the ripening period as countries in the south of the Community. Wine makers therefore need the possibility of enrichment in order for their wines to achieve the necessary alcohol levels. Indeed the opposite happens in the south of the Community where the possibility exists of acidifying wines when sugar levels are too high.

  35.  Wineries are required to notify the Agency before enrichment takes place. Enrichment is used regularly in the UK. There are strict limits on this and Wine Standards Inspectors carry out checks to ensure correct procedures are followed and consumers are not misled.

F.  Environmental and Social Impact

Committee Q. 17. To what extent does the wine sector have an impact—favourable and unfavourable—on the EU environment? Are measures needed to support good environmental impact? Should they be selective?

  36.  Currently there are 362 vineyards registered by the Agency in the UK, with an area under vine of 923 hectares. (This compares to Bordeaux with 120,000 hectares. 13 UK vineyards are over 10 hectares each. Denbies (near Dorking) is the UK's largest producer. Much of the wine produced is sold at the vineyard.

  37.  In the South West in particular, viticulture is closely linked to tourism, with vineyards open for tours, restaurants and shops. In some cases wine is only sold from the farm gate, and not widely marketed outside the local community.

6 February 2007



1   Section 1(2), Food Standards Act 1999. Back

2   Food Safety Act 1990. Back

3   Statutory Instrument 1996 No 1499. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007