Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Magistrates Association

  We agree that the motive—to reduce the possibility of people accused of crimes abroad being locked up abroad instead of coming home and remaining under some sort of supervision—is a good idea in principle. However, the practical difficulties appear huge. To begin with there would have to be fairly major primary legislation and the numbers, according to the document signed by Baroness Scotland, do not appear to be large. The proposal not only covers recognition by each state of a judicial decision in another—a big change in itself—but goes on to envisage the "other" state being able to order arrest and extradition of a subject from his or her `own' state in the case of breach. This could open up the possibility of numerous and grave complications and we do not think that we can offer any useful or informed comment on this. We are also unsure whether this would be a matter for magistrates courts. However, of the five policy options we would definitely be against option 3 (involving extending the European Arrest Warrant for all offences) and option 5 (Eurobail).

1 June 2007



 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007