Select Committee on European Union Thirty-Third Report


The 2008 EC Budget

CHAPTER 1: The 2008 EC Budget in context

1.  This is the fifth consecutive year that the Committee has undertaken a first scrutiny of the EC Budget on the basis of oral evidence from the Government before the First Reading of the Budget in the Council. The Committee decided in the last Parliament that taking evidence from the Government at such an early stage in the budgetary process was the most effective way in which we could fulfil our parliamentary obligation to scrutinise proposed EU legislation and ensure greater accountability and transparency[1].

2.  This year we received an Explanatory Memorandum on the Provisional Draft Budget from HM Treasury on 6 June; on the basis of this document we took formal oral evidence from the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Kitty Ussher MP, on 5 July. Both the Explanatory Memorandum and the transcript of oral evidence are printed with this report.

3.  The aim of the Committee's reports on the EC Budget is to inform the House of issues relating to the Budget and to scrutinise the Government's position before the Commission's Preliminary Draft Budget is considered at the Budget Council. The Government reshuffle this summer delayed the scrutiny process and as a result this Report is published following the Budget Council meeting on 13 July. We were, however, able to state our concerns to the Minister in a letter dated 10 July, which is annexed to this report.

4.  We make this report to the House for information.

Budgetary Procedure

5.  The budgetary procedure is set out in Article 272 of the EC Treaty, which stipulates the sequence of stages and the time limits which must be respected by the two arms of the budgetary authority: the Council of Ministers (acting by qualified majority) and the European Parliament, which together establish the annual budget.

THE TWO ARMS OF THE BUDGETARY AUTHORITY

6.  Under the present budgetary procedure, the Council has the final say on compulsory expenditure. This is spending that is a direct result of Treaty application or of acts adopted on the basis of the Treaties. In practice this mainly means spending on agriculture.

7.  The European Parliament has the final say on all other categories of spending which are defined as non-compulsory expenditure. Non-compulsory expenditure includes spending on regional policy, research policy and energy policy.

THE STAGES OF THE ANNUAL BUDGET

8.  The stages in the negotiations over the annual budget are as follows:

(1)  The Commission draws up a Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) in May;

(2)  The Council conducts its first reading of the PDB in July and establishes a Draft Budget;

(3)  The European Parliament conducts its first reading in October on the basis of the Council's Draft Budget;

(4)  In November, the Council conducts a second reading on the Draft Budget to consider any amendments or proposed modifications by the European Parliament; and

(5)  In December the European Parliament reviews the Council's proposals and adopts the Budget.

9.  This report deals with the Preliminary Draft version of the Budget as issued by the Commission on 2 May 2007. This version of the Budget represents the first stage of the procedure and provides the basis for subsequent negotiations between the Council and the European Parliament who act as the two arms of the budgetary authority. Following the establishment of the Draft Budget at the 13 July Council meeting the negotiations continue along the following lines.

THE COUNCIL'S SECOND READING

10.  The Council conducts its second reading in early November, after a conciliation meeting with a delegation from the European Parliament. The Draft Budget is amended in the light of the European Parliament's amendments (for non-compulsory expenditure) or proposed modifications (for compulsory expenditure). As a general rule, the Council's decisions on second reading determine the final amount of compulsory expenditure. Unless the entire Budget is subsequently rejected by the European Parliament, the Council has the "last word" on this category of expenditure. The Draft Budget as amended is then returned to the European Parliament.

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S SECOND READING AND THE ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET

11.  In December the European Parliament reviews non-compulsory expenditure, for which it can accept or refuse the Council's proposals. The President of the European Parliament then declares the Budget adopted and it can be implemented.

Individual Spending Programmes and the Financial Perspective

12.  Spending in the annual EC Budget is divided into eight categories:

(a)  Competitiveness for Growth and Employment;

(b)  Cohesion for Growth and Employment;

(c)  Preservation and Management of Natural Resources;

(d)  Freedom, Security and Justice;

(e)  Citizenship;

(f)  The EU as a Global Partner;

(g)  Administration; and

(h)  Compensation.

13.  These categories are pre-determined by the multi-annual Financial Perspective agreement between the European Council, the Commission and the European Parliament. This agreement sets both a ceiling for total EC expenditure, defined in terms of a percentage of EU Gross National Income (GNI), as well as annual ceilings for each of the seven expenditure categories. This agreement provides the financial framework for the EC over a period of seven years. The 2008 Budget is the second to be proposed under the current Financial Perspective, which governs Budgets from 2007 to 2013.

14.  The European Council of December 2005 agreed that the Commission "should carry out a comprehensive reassessment of the financial framework, covering both revenue and expenditure, to sustain modernisation and to enhance it, on an ongoing basis". The Commission was asked to conduct a "full, wide ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the CAP, and of resources, including the UK rebate, to report in 2008/9"[2].

15.  The Minister outlined the Government's preparations for the forthcoming review, noting that "the Government will argue that this is hardly a budget designed to meet the challenges that the EU faces in the 21st century … some fundamental aspects of the EU budget do not represent value for money. We have had that view for some time on the Common Agricultural Policy, where we want fundamental reform, and we also believe it is not good value for money for such a high proportion of the structural and cohesion funds to be going to rich Member States. We do not think that is the point of that type of programme." (QQ 1-2)

16.  The Minister explained that the Government has established three general principles which will form the basis of its negotiating position. These are:

(1)  "that the EU should only act where there are clear additional benefits from collective efforts, compared with action solely by individual Member States";

(2)  "that where EU-level action is appropriate, it should be proportionate, flexible and use the most appropriate policy lever, which may or may not be spending"; and

(3)  that there should be the highest levels of financial management and administration (Q 3).

17.  The Minister explained that, with these principles in mind, work on the Review has already commenced. We were told that HM Treasury has "started a process within the UK of analysing the kind of 'fit for purposeness' of all EU spending. It may well be that that will lead to a conclusion that will have some very significant implications for our negotiating stance in the fundamental review but we do not at this stage have a view on the outcome in terms of absolute levels … we are developing a UK vision for expenditure and future financing. That is a process of ongoing work and it is involving a cross-Whitehall effort. We have already begun some informal conversations with our EU partners, Member States and the Commission, obviously, but the Commission itself has not yet published its draft proposal so we are in that sense at an early stage in all this" (Q 3). We support HM Treasury's three principles and welcome the news that work on the 2008/9 review has already commenced in Government. We request that HM Treasury provide in due course details of the items of expenditure that it finds not to be 'fit for purpose'. We particularly welcome the Government's commitment to sound financial management and the need to pressure all Member States to manage expenditure with greater care—in line with the recommendations in our 2006 report.[3] (QQ 11, 14)

Resources for the EC Budget

18.  The money for the annual EC Budget has four main sources, collectively known as 'Own Resources'; these are:

(1)  Customs duties;

(2)  Agricultural levies, including sugar levies;

(3)  A contribution based on a harmonised base for VAT income in Member States; and

(4)  Contributions from Member States based on a proportion of their GNI.

19.  Under Article 269 of the EC Treaty, the Council, acting unanimously, lays down the provisions governing the EC's Own Resources. A maximum level for Own Resources of 1.27% EU Gross National Product (GNP) was set in 1988. This has subsequently been changed to 1.24% of EU GNI. This change merely reflects the preference for using GNI as a statistical tool, and does not represent a change in the level of the ceiling.

20.  Over time, the proportions of income from each resource have adjusted to the current position whereby the GNI-based contribution is the primary source of income for the EC Budget. In our recent report, we supported this development; other means of funding the Budget are likely to be proposed during the 2008/9 Review, but we found that no new form of taxation put to us provided the same level of clarity and certainty as the GNI-based resource.[4]

The role of scrutiny

21.  Although for the most part the annual EC Budget is determined by policies previously agreed as part of the Financial Perspective, scrutiny of the annual EC Budget remains an important means of making the process more transparent. We appreciate the Government's effort to assist us in our scrutiny of the annual Budget.

22.  This report is the European Union Select Committee's main contribution to the scrutiny of the EC Budget. However, as part of our regular scrutiny role, we will continue to consider the Budget before it is adopted. We will also consider any Preliminary Draft Amending Budget presented by the Commission.


1   Review of Scrutiny of European Legislation (1st Report, Session 2002-03, HL 15) Back

2   EM 15915/05 Back

3   Financial Management And Fraud In The European Union (50th Report, Session 2005-6, HL 270) Back

4   Funding The European Union (12th Report, Session 2006-7, HL 64) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007