EC BUDGET 2006
Letter from Ivan Lewis MP, Economic Secretary,
HM Treasury to the Chairman
As you are aware, the Council of the European
Union concluded its second reading of the 2006 Draft Budget of
the European Communities on 1 December, under the chairmanship
of the UK Presidency. Parallel negotiations with the European
Parliament on key elements of the Budget which require joint decisions
began at the ECOFIN (Budget) Council on 24 November, and concluded
in trilogue on 30 November.
Council's second reading reinstated the Draft
Budget in many Headings, and made modest amendments to agriculture,
external actions and administration to take account of new information
and adopt the Commission's Amending Letters 1 and 2 to the 2006
Preliminary Draft Budget. Separately the Council and the Parliament
agreed to increase the spending envelopes of six co-decided programmes
by 100 million, to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument for
275 million (to secure full funding for Iraq, post-Tsunami
reconstruction, transitional assistance to ACP countries affected
by the sugar reform, and the Common Foreign and Security Policy
(CFSP)), and to set payment levels at 111,969 million (or
1.0100 per cent EU GNI). Council also adopted a number of changes
to the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) proposed by the Commission
in three amending letters.
My Explanatory Memorandum of 1 June 2005 set
out the Commission's 2006 PDB proposals in detail. It was followed
by two update letters: on 26 August 2005[5]
I provided details of the Draft Budget adopted by Council on 15
July 2005; and on 14 November[6]
I wrote explaining the Parliament's first reading amendments to
the Draft Budget and giving details of Amending Letters 1 and
2. The Council has now concluded its second reading of the 2006
Budget and taken account of Amending Letter No 3, and has also
reached an accord with the Parliament. This letter sets out both
outcomes. The Parliament will examine Council's second reading
of the Draft Budget and adopt the 2006 Budget, including the joint
agreement, at its plenary session in Strasbourg on 12-15 December
2005.
A. COUNCIL'S
SECOND READING
Overall: Council's second
reading reduced commitments by 1,156 million to 120,653
million, and payments by 4,804 million to 111,422
million (equivalent to 1.005% of EU GNI).
Agriculture (Heading 1): Council
accepted Amending Letter 2/2006, which reduces expenditure on
Sub-Heading 1A (CAP) by 361.00 million (commitments and
payments) compared to the PDB, and also reinstated the 150
million reduction in the Draft Budget. Expenditure on rural development
(Sub-Heading 1B) remained unchanged. Council's second reading
therefore set total commitments at 51,050.72 million and
total payments at 50,991.02 million for Heading 1, reducing
the Parliament's first reading by 399.73 million (commitments
and payments) and establishing a margin of 1,567.28 million
under the Financial Perspective ceiling.
Structural Operations (Heading
2): Council reinstated the Draft Budget for both commitments,
which it reduced by 12.00 million compared to the Parliament's
first reading, and payments, which were set at 35,489.60
million. The payments figure represents a reduction of 3,740.67
million compared to the Parliament's first reading, in order to
reflect likely implementation capacity.
Internal Policies (Heading 3):
Council's second reading reverted to the Draft Budget in all
areas except for some research, SME and other lines (special events
and a study proposed in Amending Letter 2), leading to a reduction
of 251.99 million commitments and 303.64 million payments
compared to the Parliament's first reading. Council's second reading
converted the Parliament's negative margin of 50.74 million
into a positive margin of 201.25 million.
External Actions (Heading 4):
Council rejected all of the Parliament's proposed amendments,
but did accept Amending Letter 1/2006, which budgets 40
million commitments and 21.2 million payments for sugar
reform, assistance to the ACP countries. Council proposed to finance
this from within the Draft Budget margin of 41.66 million,
leaving a second reading margin of 1.66 million. Commitments
and payments for Heading 4 were therefore set at 5,267.34
million and 5,295.84 million respectively, a reduction of
417.00 million commitments and 231.17 million payments
compared to the Parliament's first reading.
Administration (Heading 5): Council
partly accepted an amendment to the Commission budget (in order
to take account of vacancy rates) and also accepted the Parliament's
proposed reduction of 20 million to its own budget. Council's
second reading therefore proposed a net reduction of 7.71
million (non-differentiated expenditure) compared to the Parliament's
first reading, and set total administrative expenditure at 2,451.79
million.
Pre-accession aid (Heading 7):
Council reverted to the Draft Budget for Heading 7, rejecting
all of the Parliament's amendments. Commitments were therefore
set at 2,480.60 million (no change form Parliament's first
reading) and payments at 3,024.90 million (a reduction of
54.95 million).
A set of tables summarising the changes between
the Parliament's first reading and Council's second reading is
attached as Annex 1 to this letter.
B. AGREEMENT
WITH THE
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Overall: During conciliation,
the Parliament asked the Commission to submit an Amending Letter
(AL 3/2006) in order to reduce payment appropriations in the PDB
by 257 million. The two arms of the Budgetary Authority
were therefore able to reach an agreement on the global payment
level, as required by Article 272 of the Treaty Establishing the
European Union. The final payments level was set at 111,969.00
million (or 1.0100 per cent EU GNI), compared to Council's second
reading position of 111,421.88 million (or 1.0051 per cent
EU GNI). The Amending Letter reflected the latest implementation
rates, and would allow the Parliament Committee on Budgets to
make a stronger case for a reduction in payments before the Plenary.
Co-decided programming: The
Parliament requested a total increase to co-decided programming
envelopes of 217.00 million for 10 programmes, across Headings
3 (Internal Policies) and 4 (External Actions) of the Budget.
During negotiations, Council agreed to exceed the co-decided reference
amounts for six of these 10 programmes by a total of 100
million on the basis of a joint statement, and on the grounds
of favourable implementation rates and durable needs. Council
nevertheless emphasised that co-decided reference amounts should
normally be regarded as maximum levels of spending, and that such
increases should not set a precedent. A list of these programmes
is provided at Annex 2 to this letter.
PEACE II: During conciliation
the Parliament agreed to finance the extension of the PEACE programme
to 2006 from within the ceiling of Heading 2.
Flexibility Instrument: During
conciliation, Council and the Parliament agreed to mobilise the
Flexibility Instrument for a total amount of 275 million
in order to finance reconstruction in Iraq (100 million)
and Tsunami-affected countries (95 million), plus 40
million for sugar reform assistance in ACP countries and a further
40 million for the CFSP.
Overall, the Government believes Council's second
reading and the agreement with the Parliament represent a Budget-disciplined
outcome secured under difficult circumstances. Council ensured
that total payments did not exceed 1.01 per cent of EU GNIcompared
to 1.05 per cent EU GNI proposed by the Parliament, a saving of
4.8 billionand reduced the Parliament's initial proposal
for use of the Flexibility Instrument from 493 million to
275 million. In addition, the Government secured funding
for key external relations priorities such as reconstruction in
Iraq and the Tsunami-affected countries, transitional assistance
to ACP countries affected by the sugar reform and CFSP, and the
extension of the PEACE programme for Northern Ireland to 2006
has been properly financed from within the Budget ceiling.
Exceeding the annual 200 million limit
for the Flexibility Instrument was regrettable, but inevitable
to secure a deal. In any case, the amount would have had to be
exceeded early in 2006 when the Commission brings forward proposals
for Palestine. The final figure for 2006 remains within the total
amount available under the Inter-Institutional Agreement (IIA),
which permits unused Flexibility Instrument from previous years
to be rolled forward. According to this definition of the IIA
a further 218 million remains available for the current
financial perspective.
10 January 2006
Annex 1
OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL'S SECOND READING OF
THE 2006 EC BUDGET
|
| EUR (million) | Rectified Preliminary Draft Budget
| Draft Budget
| EP 1st Reading (EP1)
| Council 2nd Reading (C2)
| Change C2/EP1
|
| CA
| PA | CA
| PA | CA
| PA | CA
| PA | CA
| PA |
|
| Agriculture | 51,412
| 51,353 | 51,262
| 51,203 | 51,450
| 51,391 | 51,051
| 50,991 | -400
| -400 |
| Margin | 1,206
| | 1,356 |
| 1,168 |
| 1,567 | |
| |
| Structural Operations | 44,555
| 35,640 | 44,555
| 35,490 | 44,567
| 39,230 | 44,555
| 35,490 | -12
| -3,740 |
| Margin | 62 |
| 62 |
| 50 | | 62
| | | |
| Internal Policies | 9,218
| 8,836 | 9,175
| 8,320 | 9,436
| 8,808 | 9,184
| 8,505 | -252
| -303 |
| Margin | 167
| | 210 |
| -51 |
| 201 | |
| |
| External Actions | 5,393
| 5,357 | 5,227
| 5,275 | 5,684
| 5,527 | 5,267
| 5,296 | -417
| -231 |
| Margin | -124
| | 42 |
| -415 | |
1.7 | |
| |
| Administration | 6,698
| 6,698 | 6,578
| 6,578 | 6,655
| 6,655 | 6,584
| 6,584 | -71
| -71 |
| Margin | 10 |
| 130 |
| 53 | | 124
| | | |
| Reserves | 458
| 458 | 458
| 458 | 458
| 458 | 458
| 458 | 0
| 0 |
| Margin | 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 | | 0
| | | |
| Pre-Accession Aid | 2,481
| 3,152 | 2,481
| 3,025 | 2,481
| 3,080 | 2,481
| 3,025 | 0
| -55 |
| Margin | 1,085
| | 1,085 |
| 1,085 |
| 1,085 | |
| |
| Compensations | 1,074
| 1,074 | 1,074
| 1,074 | 1,074
| 1,074 | 1,074
| 1,074 | 0
| 0 |
| Margin | 0.5
| | 0.5 |
| 0.5 |
| 0.5 | |
| |
| Total | 121,288
| 112,567 | 120,810
| 111,421 | 121,805
| 116,223 | 120,653
| 111,422 | -1,152
| -4,801 |
| FP Ceiling | 123,695
| 119,292 | 123,695
| 119,292 | 123,695
| 119,292 | 123,695
| 119,292 | 123,695
| 119,292 |
| Margin | 2,407
| 6,725 | 2,885
| 7,871 | 1,890
| 3,0691 | 3,042
| 7,8701 | +1,152
| +4,801 |
|
CA = Commitment Appropriations;
PA = Payment Appropriations.
Figures may not add up exactly due to rounding.
|
|
| £ (million)[7]
| 2006 Rectified PDB
| 2006 DB | Parliament
| Council 2nd Reading
| Change C2/EP1 |
| CA | PA
| CA | PA
| CA | PA |
CA | PA | CA | PA
|
|
| Agriculture | 36,249
| 36,207 | 36,143
| 36,102 | 36,276
| 36,234 | 35,995 | 35,952
| -282 | -282 |
| Margin | 850
| | 956 |
| 824 |
| 1,105 | | |
|
| Structural Operations | 31,414
| 25,129 | 31,414
| 25,023 | 31,423
| 27,660 | 31,414 | 25,023
| -8 | -2,637 |
| Margin | 44 |
| 44 |
| 35 | | 44
| | | |
| Internal Policies | 6,499
| 6,230 | 6,469
| 5,866 | 6,653
| 6,210 | 6,475 | 5,997
| -178 | -214 |
| Margin | 118
| | 148 |
| -36 |
| 142 | | |
|
| External Actions | 3,802
| 3,777 | 3,685
| 3,719 | 4,008
| 3,897 | 3,714 | 3,734
| -294 | -163 |
| Margin | -87
| | 30 |
| -293 | |
1.2 | | |
|
| Administration | 4,723
| 4,723 | 4,638
| 4,638 | 4,692
| 4,692 | 4,642 | 4,642
| -51 | -51 |
| Margin | 7 |
| 92 |
| 37 | | 87
| | | |
| Reserves | 323
| 323 | 323
| 323 | 323
| 323 | 323 | 323
| 0 | 0 |
| Margin | 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 | | 0
| | | |
| Pre-Accession Aid | 1,749
| 2,222 | 1,749
| 2,133 | 1,749
| 2,172 | 1,749 | 2,133
| 0 | -39 |
| Margin | 765
| | 765 |
| 765 |
| 765 | | |
|
| Compensations | 757
| 757 | 757
| 757 | 757
| 757 | 757 | 757
| 0 | 0 |
| Margin | 0.4
| | 0.4 |
| 0.4 |
| 0.4 | | |
|
| Total | 85,516
| 79,368 | 85,179
| 78,560 | 85,881
| 81,945 | 85,069
| 78,560 | -812 |
-3,385 |
| FP Ceiling | 87,214
| 84,109 | 87,214
| 84,109 | 87,214
| 84,109 | 87,214
| 84,109 | 87,214
| 84,109 |
| Margin | 1,697
| 4,742 | 2,034
| 5,550 | 1,333
| 2,164 | 2,145 | 5,549
| +812 | +3,385 |
|
CA = Commitment Appropriations;
PA = Payment Appropriations.
Figures may not add up exactly due to rounding.
|
Annex 2
INCREASES TO CO-DECIDED PROGRAMMES APPROVED BY COUNCIL
|
| Programme name | Increase to reference amount
(EUR million)
|
|
| Small & medium enterprises | 28.5
|
| SOCRATES | 33.0
|
| LIFE | 7.1
|
| Youth | 9.2
|
| Research | 21.2
|
| Cultural organisations | 1.0
|
|
Annex 3
AMENDING LETTER 3 TO THE 2006 PRELIMINARY DRAFT BUDGET
Amending Letter 3 (AL 3/2006) was presented by the Commission
on 1 December 2005, following a request made by the European Parliament
during trilateral negotiations on the 2006 EC Budget on 30 November.
The Parliament agreed to accept Council's proposed overall payment
levels of 11,969 (exactly 1.01 per cent of EU GNI) on condition
that the Commission amended their PDB estimates accordingly. Amending
Letter 3 takes account of Amending Letters 1 and 2, and presents
a total reduction in payment appropriations of 257 million.
Payments in Headings 4 (-70 million) and 7 (-187 million)
are affected. The following table sets out those Budget lines
to which the reduction is applied:
|
| Line | Description
| Heading | Payment Appropriations
|
| | | (EUR million)
|
| | | PDB
| Reduction | New Amount
|
|
| 01 03 02 02 | MFA for the countries of the Western Balkans
| 4 | 58.0
| 15.0 | 43.0
|
| 19 06 01 | TACIS
| 4 | 375.0
| 20.0 | 355.0
|
| 19 08 02 01 | MEDA
| 4 | 660.0
| 20.0 | 640.0
|
| 19 10 01 | Asia
| 4 | 324.0
| 15.0 | 309.0
|
| | Total Heading 4
| | | 70.0
|
| | |
| | |
| 05 05 01 01 | SAPARD
| 7 | 360.0
| 50.0 | 310.0
|
| 13 05 01 01 | ISPA
| 7 | 275.0
| 27.0 | 248.0
|
| 22 02 01 | Pre-accession assistance
for countries of central and eastern Europe
| 7 | 700.0
| 80.0 | 620.0
|
| 22 02 04 01 | Pre-accession assistance
Turkey
| 7 | 200.0
| 30.0 | 170.0
|
| | Total Heading 7
| | | 187.0
|
|
The Government welcomes AL 3/2006, which demonstrates that
the Commission is prepared to revise its payment forecasts to
reflect real needs. The Commission has stated that the reductions
to payments presented in Amending Letter 3 will not have an adverse
effect on the 2006 Budget.
Letter from Ivan Lewis MP to the Chairman
The European Parliament (EP) formally adopted the 2006 EC
Budget on 15 December. The final outcome was in line with the
agreement reached between the Council (under the UK Presidency)
and the EP on 30 November, which I explained in my letter of 10
January. Overall, commitments were set at 121.19 billion5.24
billion/4.5 per cent higher than the 115.96 billion budgeted
in 2005[8]and payments
at 111.97 billion6.29 billion/5.9 per cent
higher than the 105.68 billion budgeted in 2005.
The tables attached as Annex 1 provide a breakdown of expenditure
by heading in the 2006 Budget, and at each stage of the budget
process. To briefly summarise the main changes between Council's
second reading and the adopted budget:
Agriculture (Heading 1): The Agriculture
heading of the budget consists predominantly of compulsory expenditure
which is set by the Council. Commitments and payments were therefore
unchanged from Council's second reading at 51.05 billion
and 50.99 billion respectively, leaving a margin of 1.57
billion under the Financial Perspective (FP) ceiling.
Structural Operations (Heading 2): The
figures agreed by the EP reflect the Commission's initial PDB
proposal of 44.56 billion for commitments (which establishes
a margin of 62.00 million under the FP ceiling) and 35.63
billion for payments. Although the figure for commitments is unchanged
since Council's second reading, payments increase by 150
million. Heading 2 secures the full 60 million extension
of the PEACE II programme for Ireland, which will run until the
end of 2006.
Internal Policies (Heading 3): The EP agreed
to reduce commitments by 63.02 million compared to its first
reading positionto 9.37 billionand increased
payments by 80.74 million to 8.89 billion. This represents
increases of 189 million and 384 million respectively
compared to Council's second reading. At the EP's request, Council
agreed to increase reference amounts for six co-decided programmes,
by a total of 100 million. A margin of 12.29 million
was established under the FP ceiling for Heading 3.
External Actions (Heading 4): The EP made
significant reductions compared to its first reading position:
commitments decreased by 140.34 million to 5.54 billion,
while payments were reduced by 157.96 million to 5.37
billion. This nevertheless represents increases of 277 million
and 143 million respectively compared to Council's second
reading position. The Flexibility Instrument was mobilised for
a total amount of 275 million, of which 95 was attributed
to post-Tsunami reconstruction, 100 million to reconstruction
in Iraq, 40 million allocated to finance the consequences
of sugar reform in the ACP states, and 40 million allocated
to finance an increase to the CFSP budget.
Administration (Heading 5): The EP increased
its first reading position by 1 million for both commitments
and payments, resulting in total expenditure of 6.66 billion.
This represents an increase of 72 million (non-differentiated)
compared to Council's second reading. A margin of 51.63
million was established under the FP ceiling for Heading 5.
Pre-accession aid (Heading 7): The EP made
no change to the PDB proposal of 2.49 billion for commitmentsleaving
a margin of 1.09 billion under the FP ceilingand
agreed to a significant reduction compared to its first reading
for payments, which were set at 2.89 billion (a decrease
of 187 million). This nevertheless represents an increase
of 55 million compared to Council's second reading.
Overall, the Government believes the package represents a
Budget disciplined outcome which was secured under difficult circumstances.
In particular, with strong Council support the Government secured
its key objective of a realistic, affordable level of payments
at just 1.01 per cent EU GNI. Although deployment of the Flexibility
Instrument exceeded 200 million for the first time, it was
considerably less than the EP's initial proposal of 493
million. The 275 million will secure spending on Government
priorities, including a significant 40 million increase
to the CFSP budget. The EP also agreed to finance the PEACE II
extension within the ceiling of Heading 2.
30 January 2006
5
Correspondence with Ministers, 45th Report of Session 2005-06,
HL Paper 243, p 30. Back
6
Correspondence with Ministers, 45th Report of Session 2005-06,
HL Paper 243, p 33. Back
7
Converted at the December 2004 rate of £1 = 1.4183. Back
8
Figures for the 2005 Adopted Budget take account of Amending
Budgets numbers 1 to 8. Back
|