Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 340-359)

Mr Gerrit Huybreghts

27 NOVEMBER 2006

  Q340  Lord Dubs: Is information available about the impact on SIS of the application of the European Arrest Warrant, and of the amendments to the current SIS rules adopted in 2004 and 2005, and applied in 2005 and 2006?

  Mr Huybreghts: The application of the European Arrest Warrant, as far as I know, has had no dramatic impact on the SIS. The only impact it has had is on the so-called "flagging". I do not know whether you are familiar with the term.

  Q341  Lord Dubs: Yes.

  Mr Huybreghts: Flagging means when one country asks to arrest a certain person, for the reasons of that country the country can say that it does not want to act on that. That is called putting a "flag" up. One of the main reasons for flagging was the fact that countries did not extradite their own nationals. In the European Arrest Warrant it was agreed that should happen, countries should extradite their own nationals. The number of flags that are put is likely to diminish, and the information I have is that they are diminishing. That is the only impact on the SIS of the European Arrest Warrant that I know on of the statistical side. On the other changes that were adopted in 2004 and 2005, what has happened is the length of conservation periods for certain alerts have been extended and because they have been extended you can see the numbers of data in the system to go up. That is not because more data are collected but because they are kept for a longer period.

  Q342  Baroness Henig: I think there may be a political element to my question, in which case if that is a problem please say so. Would it be possible to collect further statistical information, in particular upon the impact of the Schengen Information System in Member States and the operation of the SIRENE system? What difficulties stand in the way of the collection of further information?

  Mr Huybreghts: One of the problems is what the definition of "impact" is. What difficulties stand in the way of the collection of further information? Basically, as I explained, it is a system which for the large part, for the operational part, is oriented for the countries themselves, so this is purely a national matter and, therefore, at the central level you do not see that information. The impact that the SIS has had on the way countries organise themselves or organise their legal and justice systems is something I do not have any information about. I have never heard this being discussed.

  Q343  Baroness Henig: So the problems are really technical in a way in aligning different Member States' systems to make some sense to have the things collected centrally.

  Mr Huybreghts: It is not so much aligning rather it is the fact that the whole organisation surrounding the police and justice is very much a national matter.

  Q344  Baroness Henig: What I meant by alignment was that they are operating in different ways.

  Mr Huybreghts: Yes.

  Q345  Earl of Listowel: Does the statistical information which is available enable us to draw any conclusions about the efficiency and operational effectiveness of the SIS?

  Mr Huybreghts: The problem about questions on efficiency and operational effectiveness is that there is no exact way to measure them. You would need to have a standard. If there were two competing systems it would be possible to say "this one is the more efficient". At this moment my impression is that the statistical information does not allow us to draw any conclusions about that.

  Q346  Chairman: Is it fair to ask you how SIS and SIS II compare in terms of efficiency?

  Mr Huybreghts: Since SIS II is not working yet it is very difficult to say that.

  Q347  Chairman: Sorry, I meant SIS II as projected.

  Mr Huybreghts: Even so, it is only when it is working that we will see whether it has worked. In large part it depends on the use that people make of the information that is provided.

  Q348  Chairman: Of course.

  Mr Huybreghts: In the SIS II there will be much more information stored, certainly on objects. The idea is that, for example, industrial equipment will be in there and data about credit cards. That could lead to a greater impact on crime fighting but that is still to be projected. The only thing that I hear about statistics concerns the so-called Article 99 alerts. These are alerts for specific checks and discreet observation. Discreet observation means if the police spot a car and the car is subject to an alert Article 99 for discreet observation, in that case the policeman is supposed to go over and ask a number of questions and try to find out, for example, who the persons in there are, how many they are and what their apparent business is and to report it back. In almost every evaluation that we make of that police forces should make more use of that.

  Q349  Lord Teverson: What we are trying to explore is the statistics that have come out of SIS I or the existing system. How do you see those as relevant? What do they tell us about how this new system should be developed, if at all? Has that been taken into consideration in practice?

  Mr Huybreghts: The present statistical material has been taken into account for the dimensioning of the system because it gives an indication of how much data there will be in SIS II, but of course for industrial equipment and credit cards, et cetera, where there is no presence yet in the SIS it is guessing.

  Q350  Lord Teverson: Could I ask about that to get some idea of size. At the moment it goes up to 18 Member States and it is currently functioning on, I suppose, 13—

  Mr Huybreghts: Thirteen Member States, yes.

  Q351  Lord Teverson: I do not know how you measure the size of the present system but how many times larger is it expected to be, say, once the new accession states have been included? Have you got some sort of measure of that?

  Mr Huybreghts: Unfortunately, no.

  Q352  Lord Teverson: How many floppy disks would it take to fill up?

  Mr Huybreghts: I cannot answer that, sorry. It is not that this is in any way confidential but I just do not have the figures on that.

  Q353  Lord Teverson: I apologise, I interrupted your answer.

  Mr Huybreghts: I have forgotten what I was saying.

  Q354  Lord Teverson: That is my mistake, I apologise for that. We were talking about what had been learned from the production of statistics this time round that had been taken into consideration in the development of the new system.

  Mr Huybreghts: It helps in dimensioning the system. The operational Member States were asked to provide statistics on the number of queries they made. That was in order to dimension the network that would be used. These are the only elements that were used.

  Q355  Chairman: I heard you say that we wrongly described you as an expert on statistics but, if I may say so, you are showing yourself extremely expert in your replies.

  Mr Huybreghts: Thank you.

  Q356  Chairman: How far are you involved in developing SIS II? Is your very obvious knowledge and experience in the collection of statistical information for SIS being used? Are you part of the development of SIS II?

  Mr Huybreghts: No, I am not. The development of SIS II has been given to the Commission. The Commission has taken note of the information that is available and has asked for further information from Member States. If I am not mistaken, at this moment they are trying to get an idea from the new Member States of the number of data, how many data they think they will introduce. When I spoke earlier about the fact that the number of queries has been collected, that is also something the Commission has done. On the side of the Council Secretariat I am trying to follow up as much as possible. If there are questions from the Commission side about things I know then I will provide them.

  Chairman: We will be seeing the Commission tomorrow so we will bear that in mind. Thank you very much.

  Q357  Lord Avebury: In reply to Lord Teverson you mentioned two examples of further information which will be contained in SIS II that is not in SIS I. Will these additional features of SIS II require changes in the statistical information which is collected? Do you foresee any problems in collecting information for the regular reports which are required by the legislation on SIS II? Could I ask you in particular what information will be collected on the relative frequency of one-to-one and one-to-many searches based on biometric data? Will there be any difficulty in collecting information for the regular reports on the operation of SIS II which are required by the legislation?

  Mr Huybreghts: On the biometric data I am not aware of any specific collection of information or statistics. I believe you have had sessions before on the biometrics where you were informed that the one-to-many searches would only be installed after a report by the Commission.

  Q358  Lord Avebury: Yes.

  Mr Huybreghts: So everyone is waiting until that report for action. Whether it will be difficult to collect statistical information, it always is. It is difficult with 15 Member States participating and once it is 25 or 27 it will be more difficult to get discipline with all the states in order to get information. That said, I suspect that in the new system there will be more automatic ways of collecting information. One difference is that now you can extend the period of an alert. For the SIS II it will be required to make statistics available about that which are not available at this moment. In the new legislation there will be a request to have statistics on the number of queries that are made, the number of consultations, which is something that is not collected today.

  Q359  Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury: Is it planned to collect information in relation to the use of SIS II for asylum applications as far as you are aware?

  Mr Huybreghts: No, not specifically. In that respect I have to tell you that the Council publishes a yearly overview of all authorities that have direct access to the SIS and at this moment only Austria gives the asylum authorities access to the SIS, which in the present system means that if there is a statistic anywhere about asylum applications in the SIS it would be in Austria. It is purely a national statistic.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007