Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by West Sussex County Council

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  West Sussex County Council welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the debate on the European Commission's plans for a mental health strategy. The publication of the Green Paper in October 2005 provides scope to share current best practice and learning across the EU.

  1.2  We recognise the economic and social emphasis in the Green Paper. Mental ill-health should be a real priority for Member States as an estimated 3-4 per cent GDP is lost to economic productivity, and there are considerable service impacts on social and educational support systems, as well as on the work of the criminal justice agencies. However it is not just about people in employment that an EU Strategy needs to be concerned—the mental health needs of older people, and of (unpaid) carers, need also to be incorporated.

2.  IS AN EU STRATEGY NEEDED?

  2.1  It is our belief that the development of the EU-wide strategy on mental health is needed but we must ensure that resources are not diverted away from delivering the public health and well-being agenda in our own local areas.

  2.2  There is already much work underway to tackle the causes of lost productivity due to mental distress. Supported employment schemes, some funded by the EU, operate in a number of areas. These support individuals with mental distress in seeking and sustaining meaningful daytime activity, and gaining or re-gaining employment wherever possible. Research conducted by independent policy organisations in the UK, and also reported in the UK Government's annual Labour Force Survey consistently confirms that people with severe mental disorders are among the groups in society who have the highest rates of unemployment. The UK Government therefore has a number of existing policy objectives in this area.

  2.3  Some local authorities, such as ourselves, are developing innovative approaches, focusing not so much on supporting individuals with mental distress but rather on encouraging more progressive attitudes and approaches by employers. For example, training companies to manage and understand better the challenges of employing people who experience mental distress will lead to companies that are better able to understand and support their workforces.

  2.4  One way the UK Government can help is by changing the current disability benefit rules that have the perverse incentive of discouraging people who could work from seeking a job. A change in the rules could unlock huge potential to fill jobs across a range of skills, get people contributing to the health and the wealth of the nation instead of being a drain on it, and also improve their own health so that they would be less likely to require Government benefits in future. For example, work has been successfully undertaken by one of our neighbouring county councils (Kent), to change the regulations affecting those people making the transition from being in receipt of welfare benefits to gaining a meaningful wage through paid employment.

3.  WHAT SHOULD AN EU MENTAL HEALTH STRATEGY CONTAIN?

  3.1  Any strategy that focuses on health and wellbeing of the population needs to understand the characteristics of the populations of Member States. The Green Paper also highlights wide variations in the suicide rates across the Member States. Even with a 10-year National Service Framework for Mental Health in place (and its core emphasis on significantly reducing death by suicide), suicide rates per 100,000 population in England are still twice the rate of Greece. It is a somewhat surprising to note that suicide kills more people in the EU annually than road accidents. Yet which subject is more fixed in the minds of the general public—the driving habits of fellow Europeans or the health and social care systems in place across the EU?

  3.2  The proposed strategy could set out a number of preventive measures and approaches that could be adopted by Member States. One such example is how we have been working imaginatively with the UK Government's Carers Grant. Some of that annual grant has been specifically earmarked to meet the assessed needs of carers of adults with mental distress. The purpose of this specific scheme is to enable carers, known to the local integrated health and social care mental health NHS Trust, to take a break—whether a family holiday in Europe, paying for a pamper day at a health resort, or a city break in the UK, or paying for a range of complementary therapies. The scheme sustains the ability of carers to maintain good mental health whilst providing an unpaid caring role for their loved ones.

  3.3  The UK Government, through the work of its Social Exclusion Unit, has been focused on improving the quality of life of those suffering from mental distress. Programmes of work that emphasise the building of mentally healthy local communities are essential. Local Area Agreements—with potentially challenging "stretch" targets—are essential if significant progress is to be made. Among the many target areas for quality of life improvement set out in Local Area Agreements are subjects such as reducing domestic violence and teenage pregnancies; improving workforce skills and opportunities; and cutting death and serious injury accidents on our roads. It is possible that this is an approach that could be promoted across the EU.

  3.4  The EU should consider developing an EU-wide mental health information, research and knowledge system. Information and knowledge about mental distress, as well as the evidence for change, is held by a variety of institutions and in various countries. With use of the Internet, it should be possible to create portals from which access to these resources can be obtained.

  3.5  The EU could consider establishing an EU-wide platform on mental health issues, to not only include politicians, but also those people with a personal experience of mental distress as well as specialists in this field and other stakeholders and institutions such as the World Health Organisation.

  3.6  Our children and young people should also be able to enjoy good physical and emotional health and choose to live healthy lifestyles. Agencies are committed to working towards eradicating health inequalities and improving children and young people's health by shifting the focus from the treatment of established health problems towards prevention. There is a need to continue to work in partnership to promote healthy lifestyle choices, such as the provision of education, advice and guidance for parents and young people on physical activity and balanced diet and nutrition to reduce the incidence of obesity. (Obesity can lead to mental distress and to experiences of exclusion). The EU can help by encouraging Member States to identify and target support on those people who need more help than others.


 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007