Select Committee on European Union Seventeenth Report


Mobile Phone Charges in the EU: Curbing the Excesses

CHAPTER 1: Background

1.  It is estimated that around 140 million EU citizens are affected by charges for using their mobile phones abroad, or 'roaming' charges.

2.  The Commission first raised the perceived problem of what it saw as excessive and opaque charges for mobile roaming in 2003.

3.  By July 2006, Viviane Reding, the EU Information Society Commissioner, had taken the view that the mobile telecoms industry had failed to address this problem through self-regulation. Other Commission efforts to deal with the problem through competition investigations (such as the current investigation into the UK's market) and by empowering National Regulatory Authorities to take action, were seen as limited in their effectiveness for what was inevitably a cross-border issue. In response to these perceived failures the Commission published a draft Regulation to introduce caps on charges at both wholesale (the fee one operator charges another) and retail (the fee charged to the consumer) levels.

4.  This draft Regulation prompted a good deal of controversy among operators across the EU, who claimed that competition should be allowed to address any problems in charges. Rob Conway CEO of the GSM Association said that the proposed Regulation "amounts to a straitjacket that will stifle innovation, dampen competition and ultimately harm consumers".

5.  This report attempts to untangle the many competing views on the fairness of existing roaming charges; the adequacy of the market; and likely consequences of any Regulation.

6.  The Commission's original proposal has now been substantially amended, with a number of alternative schemes under consideration in both the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament. The German Presidency expects to reach an agreement before the end of their term in June 2007.

7.  Our report will discuss what we have found to be the key issues and present our conclusions and recommendations based on the wide range of evidence we received.

8.  We make this report to the House for debate.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007