Select Committee on European Union Seventeenth Report


CHAPTER 4: Wholesale Regulation

Introduction

27.  The original Commission and all subsequent proposals have highlighted the need for the regulation of wholesale prices for mobile roaming (wholesale regulation) across the EU. This approach has been commended by both consumer groups (p 48) and a number of submissions by private individuals. We have also received evidence from a variety of operators who have suggested that wholesale regulation is not required (Q 2, p 21). However, a number of other operators have conceded the case for some regulation at this level. (Q 25)

What is wholesale regulation and how could it work?

28.  As identified above, we believe that:

29.  Wholesale regulation has been successfully applied to national telecommunications markets since the liberalisation of the telecommunications sector. We believe that wholesale regulation at the European level is an appropriate response to the regulation of roaming within the EU. There are several possible approaches to such regulation. It is important that the approach taken delivers immediate benefits to consumers; encourages market competition; and sends appropriate signals to the market to encourage competition and innovation.

30.  The various proposals made have suggested several approaches to wholesale regulation. These can be simplified to two main regulatory techniques, absolute and average price caps.

31.  The Commission proposed the use of absolute price caps, imposing the same wholesale charge for a call from any network in the EU to any other network within the EU (p 47). Proponents of the absolute price cap method of regulation have suggested that the cap be calculated based on reference to domestic Mobile Termination Rates (MTRs), collated across the EU by NRAs. There are several variants to this approach (see table 1 above) relating to the calculation of any absolute cap and each lead to slightly different caps on wholesale tariffs being applied.

32.  The advantage of the absolute price cap approach is that it is simple to calculate and transparent. It may also be that this approach best lends itself to an absolute price cap for retail regulation (see Chapter 5 below), providing the basis for subsequent regulation of retail tariffs on a simple per minute price.

33.  We believe that the absolute price cap approach suffers from a number of defects that question its application to this issue. We note that the absolute price cap model:

  • May remove the incentive for operators to be efficient and innovative, as the market settles on a single pricing point for all wholesale services and there are limited incentives to move away from this point (Q 64);
  • Does not provide the flexibility for operators to vary their charges to reflect cost differences. Evidence from the operators suggests that they need the ability to set higher prices at peak times and lower prices when their networks are less congested, thereby sending the appropriate signals to the consumers to maximise efficient use of networks (Q 61); and
  • Does not fully reflect the cost structure of the industry. We accept that costs vary across networks and that an absolute cap should not be set so as to lead to wholesale call charges that are below cost. Whilst this places some limitations on the level of an absolute price cap it does not rule out the absolute cap approach, based on the limited evidence available to us on cost differentials for networks across the EU.

34.  The main alternative approach is the use of average price caps. Using this approach, recommended by both the German Presidency (Q 219) and Ofcom (p 26), the wholesale average roaming charge for each operator would be calculated by dividing total wholesale roaming revenues received (from providing wholesale roaming to other mobile operators) by the total number of wholesale minutes sold. The advantage of this approach is that in not setting a specific limit on the price for every individual charge, operators are allowed greater flexibility which encourages efficiency in costing (peak and off peak) and innovation.

35.  This approach has been criticised by the Commission for being too complicated and requiring the collection of considerable data (Q 147). However, we are satisfied that the NRAs across the EU are capable of collating data in a consistent manner set out by the Commission.

36.  A final issue worthy of discussion is the level of any price cap that is put in place. The various suggestions provided to the Committee for wholesale tariffs range between 25 and 35 eurocents per minute. We would support an average wholesale cap of approximately 30 eurocents per minute. We believe that wholesale regulation should reflect costs, and therefore that the cap should be on the 'tougher' end of this spectrum. This is particularly the case if the focus of the regulatory intervention is to be at the wholesale level (see Chapter 5 below) not the retail level. The German Presidency has also suggested that the cap should be reduced annually by 5%. Such RPI-X schemes have been shown to drive efficiency but rely on costs being accurately estimated at the initial point and plausible efficiency reductions being achieved.

37.  We are concerned that the current data supporting the level of wholesale price caps is limited; and that the true cost of wholesale roaming cannot be identified with sufficient accuracy at present.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007