Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by OneCompare.com

1.   Is it appropriate for the Commission to introduce legislation to cap the cost of roaming?

  OneCompare.com feels that it is necessary to introduce legislation as the industry has been slow to self regulate itself on the costs of international roaming charges. This is evident as the major mobile operators only started to reduce their tariffs following the significant level of interest generated by the EU committee's movements to reduce roaming charges.

  Without regulation in this industry, the networks continued to charge customers extortionate prices and continue to do so now. Many of the mobile operators have not actively promoted their international roaming packages—customers must opt in to activate before they travel. If they do not subscribe for the package they will be charged standard rates and tariffs. This means that many mobile customers are unaware that they will need to sign up for the various opt-in schemes.

  OneCompare.com believes that the mobile networks do not have the intention of self regulating to a more reasonable pricing structure for the consumer unless they extend discounts they offer with "opt-in" packages to their entire customer base as a standard procedure.

    —  Networks with opt-in packages:

    O2, Vodafone, Orange (in the form of Orange bundles).

    —  Networks that have extended price cuts to their entire user base:

    T-Mobile, 3.

2.   Do you think that the mobile telecoms industry has done enough in the last two years to address, through self-regulation, concerns expressed by the Commission? Are National Regulatory Authorities in a co-regulated environment able to address these concerns on their own?

  Put simply, the networks have not done enough to comply with the guidelines as outlined by the commission. The availability of opt-in packages (regardless of promotion) do not offer a significant reduction in rates to the consumers hit the hardest by roaming charges particularly those who are not technology savvy and take their phone abroad on holiday to keep in touch with friends and loved ones.

    —  T-Mobile has reduced charges for its entire user base, however this is to a level that is not in line with EU recommendations (55p per minute to make and receive a call).

    —  3 have met the EU's guidelines impeccably, however they do not have a strong enough worldwide infrastructure to extend these same charges in the majority of EU territories (such as France and Spain) in which the majority of roaming charges are incurred.

3.   Does the proposed Regulation risk narrowing down the space for competition and thereby harming innovation and investment in the sector?

  The move could cause problems for providers of cheaper international SIM cards that have previously traded on the fact that roaming call charges could be cut by as much as 66 per cent. Consumers are unlikely to invest in a cheaper SIM card when charges are only marginally cheaper than the consumer's current network and there is an initial outlay of £25-£35 with accompanying complications such as having an unlocked phone.

  This isn't to say however that innovative companies won't move further in this market as there is still huge scope for a mobile voice over IP application for mobile phones with the right infrastructure which could considerably undercut the proposed retail prices of mobile phone calls.

4.   Do you think that the pressure for lower roaming charges could potentially spill-over into higher prices for other mobile telephony services? Would you anticipate any other unintended consequences that may affect consumers?

  Yes. Price wars which have caused increases in the amount of bundled minutes and text messages have been rife over the past year, reducing network operator margins down to the lowest they have ever been.

  This increase in home bundle value is sure to cease with regulation of roaming charges and value added services such as internet and data services are unlikely to continue their reduction in price down to the point where they become used widespread by UK consumers.

5.   Is the Commission's estimate that 147 million EU citizens are affected by excessively high international mobile roaming charges accurate? Do you have any other figures to offer?

  Research from OneCompare.com has shown that roaming charges affect a large section of the UK population—63 per cent of mobile user's have used their mobile when travelling abroad. In many cases when "international roaming charges" are added to their bill it can come as quite a shock as rates can vary enormously.

    —  49 per cent don't know how much it costs to make and/or receive calls when abroad.

    —  43 per cent don't realise that they pay incoming call costs while abroad.

6.   Do you think that the UK and French proposal for a sunrise clause during the initial period after the Regulation comes into force can better achieve the desired effect? Should legislation apply solely to wholesale fees rather than retail tariffs?

  OneCompare.com believes that the sunrise clause only provides a grace period of six months for networks to cut prices—any networks failing to do so after this will have caps imposed. This allows networks to prepare new cost cutting measures to lessen the impact of a decreased retail price and will certainly delay consumer price cuts.

7.   Do you believe that separate sub caps for making and receiving calls should be applied or a single average cap? Should the linkage between Mobile Termination Rates and wholesale prices, and percentage mark-ups for determining retail prices, be retained or should target prices simply be included in the regulation?

  Yes this is a possibility. Consumers and particularly holidaymakers rather than businessmen are particularly frustrated and often caught out with having to pay to receive calls. Removal of incoming call charges could placate consumers to the point where they are happy to pay current excessive roaming rates for making calls in Europe.

  By providing consumers with this element of control—they can remain contactable and can make a decision to choose whether or not they want to incur these charges. This empowers the mobile customer and allows them to make an informed decision in the simplest way.

ABOUT ONECOMPARE.COM

  OneCompare.com is now one of the leading independent online mobile phone tariff and handset comparison service providers in the UK. Their reputation rests solely on its 100 per cent impartiality; due to a programme which is set up to sweep all available deals in the market. Over two million people have visited the website to get better deals in the past 12 months. The company also reviews new deals and products and is a regular commentator in the national press.

February 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007