Select Committee on Science and Technology Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 583-599)

28 FEBRUARY 2007

MRS MARGARET COX, PROFESSOR DAVID GAWKRODGER, DR CLIVE GRATTAN AND DR SHUAIB NASSER

  Q583 Chairman: May I thank you for coming today to give evidence to this sub-committee of the Science and Technology Select Committee. The proceedings will be webcast today. I am Lady Finlay and I chair this Committee. All members of the Committee have declared their interests on a separate document, so we will not be going through a declaration of interests in relation to different questions today. I would like to begin by asking you if you would introduce yourselves to the Committee and then we will proceed with our questioning. It would be very helpful if you would make sure that you do speak up because, even though there are microphones, the acoustics in this room are not always the easiest. So, if you could speak clearly, that would be much appreciated. Let us begin with you, Professor Gawkrodger.

  Professor Gawkrodger: My name is David Gawkrodger and I a consultant dermatologist in Sheffield and Honorary Professor of Dermatology. I have been the President of the British Contact Dermatitis Society. I have an interest in contact dermatitis and occupational skin problems. I am also the Treasurer of the British Association of Dermatologists.

  Mrs Cox: I am Margaret Cox and I am the Chief Executive of the National Eczema Society, a registered charity which exists to support people who have eczema. I also have eczema myself.

  Dr Nasser: I am Shuaib Nasser and I am a consultant allergist in Cambridge and I am a full-time NHS consultant at Addenbrooke's Hospital. I am also the Chairman of the Standards of Care Committee of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology. My interest is in all aspects of allergy and asthma.

  Dr Grattan: I am Clive Grattan and I am a consultant dermatologist. My base hospital is the Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital where I see allergy and I see general dermatology. I also work one day a week at St John's Institute of Dermatology at St Thomas' Hospital as part of the cutaneous allergy group where I am Head of the urticaria clinic.

  Q584  Chairman: I wonder if perhaps—and this will be principally for the two dermatologists here—you could describe to us the main forms of allergic dermatological disease.

  Professor Gawkrodger: It depends a little on how you define allergy but, taking into account what I think the remit of this inquiry is, I would classify the allergic skin disorders as being atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria and drug eruptions. There are other skin diseases which have an immunological basis but I think they are probably not generally regarded as being allergic.

  Dr Grattan: I agree entirely. It is important though to recognise that many patients who present with atopic dermatitis often appear to have endogenous constitutional behaviour to their disease that appears to bear little relationship to allergy and furthermore urticaria, which is my special interest subject, is often an internal problem as opposed to an allergic problem and whilst allergy may cause urticaria, there are many instances when it does not.

  Q585  Chairman: Dr Nasser, do you wish to add anything to that?

  Dr Nasser: The only thing that I would like to add is angio-oedema, which is a subset of urticaria, is another skin condition which presents slightly differently and can occur in association with urticaria or in isolation and indeed may result from a drug-related disorder.

  Q586  Chairman: Am I correct in thinking that you are the lead person on the urticaria guidelines for the British Society for Allergies?

  Dr Nasser: Yes. We have just completed guidelines which are due to be published soon. I should also add that Clive Grattan on my left is the lead person on the urticaria guidelines for the British Association of Dermatology, so there is a little bit of urticaria expertise here.

  Q587  Chairman: Are those guidelines being written in parallel and in conjunction to make sure that they are completely compatible?

  Dr Nasser: We have certainly had some input from Clive and I know that Clive has written the editorial for the guidelines.

  Q588  Baroness Platt of Writtle: May we ask when they are going to be published. Are they going to be published before our report or after?

  Dr Nasser: Before, I am sure.

  Q589  Chairman: Would you make sure that we have a copy of those as they will be helpful.

  Dr Grattan: The British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines were published in 2001 but a revision is currently under way and will be published soon.

  Q590  Chairman: Mrs Cox, in relation to the question about the main forms of allergic dermatological diseases, is there anything that you would like to add?

  Mrs Cox: Only one thing, which will I think be a consistent theme for me, and that is that, for the patient, one of the main challenges in this area is in fact knowing what you have.

  Q591  Chairman: It has been suggested to us as a committee that there is perhaps less credence given to allergy in relation to urticaria and atopic dermatitis or eczema in this country than happens in other parts of Europe where these patients are principally seen by dermatologists. I wonder if you have any comments on that. Perhaps you would like to begin, Mrs Cox.

  Mrs Cox: I do not think that on an evidence base I could say whether it is right or wrong that the UK is more or less inclined to see these diseases in dermatology than allergy, although my personal perception specifically by reference to communications, for example, with my opposite numbers in the US equivalent group is that such is indeed the case. My perception again as far as a patient is concerned is that there is a tendency to get either into one track, be it the allergy track, or into another track, be it the dermatology track, and that possibly in some cases what we are lacking is an overlap in the middle.

  Q592  Chairman: Do you feel that there is sufficient credence given by dermatology in the UK to the allergic nature of some skin diseases?

  Mrs Cox: I think that it is becoming increasingly accepted by the dermatology community, particularly perhaps those who are working with children in paediatrics, that there are cases where allergy or allergy-related issues are if not the whole story at least part of it.

  Chairman: Would you clarify for us the difference between atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, atopic eczema, urticaria and angio-oedema.

  Q593  Lord Colwyn: And may I ask on top of that, is a differential diagnosis easy or is it difficult? It sounds impossible to me.

  Professor Gawkrodger: Usually I would say that it is really quite straightforward to diagnose atopic dermatitis when it presents in children. If a child develops eczema affecting the skin folds of the elbow, behind the knees, on the neck or on the face, it is usually quite obvious that it is atopic dermatitis. It can be a little more difficult in adults who present for the first time with eczema. I think that diagnosing and sorting out dermatitis in adults, say hand dermatitis or facial dermatitis or foot dermatitis, is quite a complicated business and that is where consideration of different allergic-based phenomena may come in because you may need to consider contact allergy in addition to a background of atopy which is a type of endogenous or internal eczema, and other factors as well including external environmental factors.

  Q594  Chairman: Dr Grattan, do you wish to add to that?

  Dr Grattan: In relationship to urticaria, which has not been covered by Professor Gawkrodger, the diagnosis is often relatively straightforward to the public, the primary care physicians and the specialists, but the exact type of urticaria and therefore its cause and treatment may be elusive and this is where there is a need for a specialist with insight.

  Q595  Lord Rea: If you look at atopic eczema, is there always a trigger factor or do you suppose that there is one even if you cannot discover it, or does it sometimes come out of the blue for no particular reasons?

  Professor Gawkrodger: Atopic eczema is one of those conditions which can be very easy to diagnose or quite difficult. There are many, many different things which feed into it and partly there are strong constitutional or genetic factors, so inheritance is often a strong thing. It is associated with other disorders such as asthma or hay fever rhinitis and some people do have a previous history of these things. If somebody develops an eczema in adulthood, they may have a past history of eczema as a child which cleared up and then something comes along, say they develop hand dermatitis, and, in those sort of instances, it would be important to look for some triggering factor which may be occupational, so they may be exposed to some environmental factors that have brought their eczema out and that could be wet work or exposure to a cold or hot climate and there can be other things such as stress and allergy for example contact dermatitis, but there may be some internal factors as well and it is quite well recognised that, for example, in students who are undertaking examinations, their eczema may get worse at the time of their exams because of stress and stress makes them rub their skin which brings out the eczema. Having said that, even despite looking for triggering factors and investigating for allergic problems which may include patch testing and also blood tests for immunoglobulin E levels and specific immunoglobulin E levels, you do not always find the triggering factor in every case.

  Q596  Chairman: How often do these conditions coexist in patients?

  Professor Gawkrodger: Do you mean asthma, hay fever and eczema?

  Q597  Chairman: I was thinking of the different skin manifestations such as urticaria and eczema.

  Professor Gawkrodger: I think I will let Clive answer the one about urticaria.

  Dr Grattan: Usually, urticaria is a stand-alone disease but, in children with atopic eczema, it is possible for them to react with urticaria to allergens including foods and maybe animals or plants, so there is overlap. Most patients who present to hospital clinics with chronic urticaria—and this implies continuous disease for at least six weeks—have a stand-alone disease.

  Q598  Chairman: How often do children with eczema have other manifestations of allergy?

  Dr Grattan: I will ask Dr Nasser to supplement what I am going to say, if I may. My own experience is that it is quite a small number. I see a number of children with eczema every week and the parents are often concerned that allergy is driving the condition and that allergy is causing specific problems over and above the eczema. I think that the number of times I can confirm that is probably no more than 10 per cent, but that is a personal view and remember that this is a population of patients referred to a dermatologist rather than an allergist.

  Dr Nasser: The first thing that I would like to say on this issue is that eczema should really be regarded as a symptom rather than a disease with many underlying causes of which allergy is one. So, you can have patients with eczema who are completely non-allergic and do not have any allergenic triggers and others in whom allergy does play an important role, and it is important to try to tease out that group because if you can get them to avoid certain allergenic foods or aeroallergens, then you can improve their symptoms. In terms of overlap, we know that one of the first manifestations of allergic disease (and by that I mean food allergy, asthma and hay fever) is in fact eczema and I regard the surface of the skin as a portal of entry for allergic sensitisation. So, it is not just the forerunner, it is actually an important underlying factor leading to food allergic sensitisation and also asthma and hay fever. So, there is a large overlap and certainly patients presenting to an allergy clinic are much more likely to have these overlap diseases.

  Q599  Lord Taverne: Coming back to an earlier question regarding how treatment and diagnosis of dermatitis compares with other countries, Mrs Cox said that she had some comparison that she could make with the United States. Can any of you throw any light on how we compare with the continent?

  Professor Gawkrodger: One problem that we have in the UK is that we have far fewer specialists—that is not just for dermatology; there are far, far fewer specialists in allergy for example—than most of the countries in Europe. Germany has several thousand dermatologists and the same in France and Italy. We only have 500 consultants in dermatology and far fewer consultants in allergy. In Germany, for example, a number of dermatologists have more than one qualification, so they have a qualification in dermatology and they are also qualified in allergy as well. I think that the combination of these two things, the fact that they are more widely qualified in Germany and there are many more of them, perhaps 7,000 dermatologists in Germany compared to just 500 in this country, perhaps means that they are more prone to investigate patients with some eczema and urticaria than the average dermatologist might do in this country. Having said that, I think that it might also be true to say that British dermatologists might have something to learn from their continental counterparts in perhaps taking a wider interest in IgE-mediated allergy than they presently do.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007