Select Committee on Science and Technology Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 700-719)

MS JOY WINKS AND MS SARAH DAY

7 MARCH 2007

  Q700  Viscount Simon: What is the role specifically of the school nurse and teacher when there is an allergic emergency? How do they cope?

  Ms Winks: The nurse in the mainstream state schools will not be present.

  Q701  Viscount Simon: Teachers?

  Ms Winks: So the teacher and the staff in the classroom or the dinner ladies, whoever is actually present, will have been taught and trained and practised with a dummy EpiPen, if it is an EpiPen, or knows that the child had an inhaler and they will follow the child's individual plan.

  Ms Day: I would probably say a high degree of anxiety at each emergency, whether it be for the teacher or for the nurse because it is a life-threatening condition, and you have the protocols and you have your training but it is not something that you are dealing with every day and, like everything, there is a high level of anxiety to get them to hospital care as quickly as possible.

  Q702  Lord May of Oxford: What actually is the incidence of these sorts of happenings because you have just heard Dr Rosenthal talk about—or in fact maybe I read it in this—the countless EpiPens he has prescribed and he is only aware of one of them being used. What are we talking about here with people having to use an EpiPen at school? Once a year, once every few years, once a month?

  Ms Winks: In my experience I have never known one used and I am from a large city.

  Lord May of Oxford: This is a not irrelevant problem.

  Q703  Lord Rea: In fact, do you feel that school nurses are sufficiently well-informed on how to deal with emergencies?

  Ms Day: I would say probably on emergency training as nurses if we are giving vaccinations we are expected to have anaphylactic training every year. However, there are not any standards that I am aware of across the nation as to the exact amount of training we should have so it varies again from individual nurse to an individual area as to what training you are actually getting. At the moment accessing funding to training is a problem both across the state and independent sector.

  Ms Winks: Virtually across the nation at the moment school nurses are not being allowed to go on training, even the training for their specific degree course, for their professional training; places have been cut.

  Lord Rea: This is rather different from the evidence we have had.

  Lord May of Oxford: It is just as well they are not using the things that they need to be trained for that they are not being trained for, is it not?

  Q704  Lord Rea: We heard evidence from Mr Wells from the Department for Education and Skills that "any nurse who administers an immunisation in a school setting will receive anaphylaxis update training on an annual basis. That is a requirement of their own continuing professional development." Is this an aspiration or reality? Who provides the training?

  Ms Day: Where you can get it from.

  Ms Winks: Some primary care trusts provide the training in-house and that is why we still get it. I am fortunate that I come from a city with a children's hospital and so we access the allergists for our anaphylaxis training, but it will be done in-house so, yes, it is right we do have to do it and anybody administering vaccinations will have that training, that is standard, but it will be in-house.

  Ms Day: Again, as independent school nurses we do not have any line management or medical management as such so we are having to buy into services all the time for training. Obviously each nurse is accountable but it can be a problem to try and access into the training courses depending on where you are.

  Q705  Lord Rea: Could you explain again what you mean by "buy into"?

  Ms Day: We have to pay for our training so that we can practise because we do not come under the NHS, we are employed by the schools.

  Q706  Lord Rea: So it is the Department for Education and Skills who pays?

  Ms Day: Yes, our school environment will pay for our training.[1]

  Q707Lord Colwyn: But when you give a vaccination I assume you know which ones are slightly risky and which ones are not?

  Ms Day: With any vaccination anyone can react at any time to anything. Obviously there are protocols and guidelines for vaccines but anybody having a vaccination could react at some point, in theory.

  Q708  Lord May of Oxford: I gather that in 2005 the Department for Education and Skills produced a guidance document for schools—and they are very good at producing documents—called "Managing Medicines in Schools and Early Years Settings" suggesting that children with particular medical needs should have an individual health care plan. Who actually draws these plans up and do you think that the following through to make sure that all staff are aware of them is as it should be?

  Ms Winks: No, it is not as it should be. There are again huge variations across the country. From my own experience of school nurses it is in their core programme which is agreed with the Education Committee that we do other care plans and we do do that and the schools will have a process for staff knowing which children have got care plans.

  Q709  Lord May of Oxford: Do you think the document itself is satisfactory? I spent five years, in a curious way, as a civil servant and I found some of the things quite useful and some of the things were a most tremendous waste of paper and effort (although it did provide employment!) Do you think this particular document is a good and useful one?

  Ms Winks: It is useful but I do not think it was ever meant to be used in its entirety otherwise you would waste an awful lot of time and paper. Because it is an individual care plan you are expected to pick out the individual parts of it. A health professional is definitely at an advantage when you are trying to pick out what is necessary.

  Q710  Lord May of Oxford: How aware are parents of this and what sort of interactions do you have across the range of parents, who I imagine can range from those who are insufficiently concerned to those who are excessively concerned?

  Ms Winks: We totally work with the parents; we have to, they are the experts in their children.

  Q711  Lord May of Oxford: What is your experience of doing that? Does that seem to you to work well on the whole?

  Ms Winks: Like I say, there is a huge variation. We will have to do home visits on some to get the care plan done. Others will come into school willingly or meet at a health centre. Obviously if a parent is not going to help you with it, you can end up looking at the child protection side of things because there is a need for that child to access school, so you need to work in partnership with people from education and other areas.

  Q712  Lord May of Oxford: But on the whole you feel this thing is working okay, this particular bit of the whole thing?

  Ms Winks: There are huge variations. It will be working very well in some places and not in others. They may not know where to find it on the bookshelf in some schools.

  Q713  Chairman: How much is the influence of the parents' use of complementary practitioners outside the NHS impacting on your drawing up of care plans with the parents?

  Ms Winks: I have to say in the mainstream state side it is not something that I have come across or something that I have heard nurses up and down the country talking about.

  Ms Day: I think in the independent side you go with the parents and if you are finding that that treatment is not working, as a health professional you can recommend other areas or perhaps turn back to the medical side and advise them where to go, so that is more on an advisory state but it is a question of managing. The problem as well, as we have heard before, is the communication down from specialists. We rely on the parents. We are not jumping straight to their GPs or straight to a specialist practitioner and we find it very difficult to access perhaps all the right information on which to make a validated care plan for the children. In boarding schools as well with an increasing number of overseas students obviously communication there is a real problem. We have language barriers as well as cultural differences and whereas we might say that the instances of peanut allergy are not high they do have a lot of rhinitis and hay fever and other allergies which we are trying to manage.

  Q714  Lord Selborne: I would like to come back to EpiPens, which we talked about in the earlier session as well. You have already told us that they are very rarely used in your experience or the need rarely arises, but we are also advised that they are prevalent and they are widely prescribed, so there must be quite a lot of them knocking around the schools and there is not a school nurse in the maintained sector, so it is going to be the teacher ultimately on the rare occasions when it is used who will have to supervise it. We have been told by the Government that there is no reason why the teacher should not deliver these EpiPens. Do you think that this is appropriate and do you think they are stored appropriately in the school environment?

  Ms Winks: There is absolutely no reason why anybody should not administer it if they actually are there. There will be a protocol for somebody staying with the child and somebody going and fetching the EpiPen if it is held in a certain place. There is no reason at all why a teacher should not administer it, but then there is no reason at all why a dinner lady or a caretaker should not administer it either. It will depend on who is at the scene at the time. As for storage, it varies hugely. In small schools they tend to be kept in one place and the staff know exactly where to go and they send a runner. In a huge comprehensive on different sites you cannot possibly do that, so the young person is usually encouraged to carry it with them.

  Q715  Lord Selborne: Are there national guidelines which would be easily available?

  Ms Winks: The Anaphylaxis Campaign do issue some guidelines and they can offer training, if people can afford to buy it, so there are some but it is only from the charity, the Anaphylaxis Campaign. As far as I know, there are not any national—

  Q716  Lord Taverne: Can I come back to your earlier answer. You say you have never actually known of a case in which it has been used. That is over how many years and with how many schools?

  Ms Winks: I have been a school nurse in Sheffield, in a large city, for 15 years and we had very few EpiPens when I first started, in fact it was not something that we encountered, and gradually over the years we now have a lot of EpiPens.

  Q717  Lord Taverne: So how many schools would that cover? In 15 years you have never known one used?

  Ms Winks: There are 70,000 school children in Sheffield.

  Q718  Lord Taverne: Over 15 years they have never been used to your knowledge?

  Ms Winks: No.

  Q719  Lord Selborne: I wonder if Sarah Day can tell us whether you think in the independent sector they are more prevalent or less prevalent.

  Ms Day: I have a school of 400 pupils and six have been prescribed EpiPens, and that is various ages. The youngest is five with an EpiPen up to the oldest being 18, mainly for nuts, but also for a bee or wasp sting for one of them. None of those have actually had anaphylaxis to then be prescribed an EpiPen at any time. That comes to the attitude that sometimes it can get a bit like asthma where they do not carry their EpiPens with them because they do not know what it is like to experience something, so perhaps we are prescribing when they do not need it, I do not know. Or maybe it is better to have something there for emergency rather than nothing at all. I would like to suggest something because if you think about it you have schools which have got all these EpiPens flying around everywhere, and it is the same with Ventolin inhalers, which you may know are for asthma emergency care, and if every pupil with asthma and anaphylaxis are prescribed then the schools are loaded with drawers full of inhalers and EpiPens which need to be accessible; there is no point in locking them away otherwise they are not accessible. Because they are a prescription-only medicine there is also an issue that you cannot have a stock, so for our premises where there is a school nurse or even in the state school it would be good to be able to have an EpiPen and a Ventolin inhaler for emergency use but we cannot because they have to be on a prescribed basis for a prescribed patient. I think that is something that could be looked at for schools in order to prevent a lot of expense to the NHS on prescriptions and it would be quite a simple thing to enable schools to do.

  Ms Winks: Wherever there is a medical practitioner or nurse on site then you could do that, but it would be a different ball game for a teacher to be making a decision to use a stock bottle of something.


1   Following the evidence given by Ms Day, the Royal College of Nursing wished to clarify this statement. The Department for Education and Skills is not responsible for training, but nurses employed by local education authority schools may get funding from the DfES. For further information please see the supplementary evidence from the Royal College of Nursing. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007