Select Committee on Science and Technology Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by Asthma UK

1.  ABOUT ASTHMA UK

  1.1  Asthma UK is the charity dedicated to improving the health and well-being of the 5.2 million people in the UK whose lives are affected by asthma.[7] We work together with people with asthma, health professionals and researchers to develop and share expertise to help people increase their understanding and reduce the effect of asthma on their lives. As the voice of people with asthma, Asthma UK is a proactive organisation that offers solutions and puts people with asthma first.

  1.2  Asthma UK is pleased that the House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee has decided to investigate issues surrounding allergy in the UK. This is a significant issue for the millions of people affected by allergies, and presents an evolving challenge for health professionals and government. We welcome the opportunity to share our expertise with the Committee, and would be very pleased to nominate a representative to give oral evidence should this be required.

2.  DEFINING THE PROBLEM

  2.1 Asthma and allergy are global problems, and prevalence of both in the UK is among the highest in the world, which has been highlighted by several recent studies.[8]

  2.2 Asthma and allergy are very closely interlinked. For the majority of people with asthma, symptoms are brought on through allergic mechanisms. Many common allergens are also common asthma triggers: 90 per cent of people with asthma tell us that their symptoms are triggered by dust and 79 per cent say their symptoms are triggered by pollen.[9] Additional allergic conditions including allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, eczema and food allergies are also common in people with asthma. Even non-allergic asthma triggers such as cigarette smoke and air pollution can worsen the impact of allergic asthma, and there is much still to be learned about the interplay of different factors in the development of the condition.

  2.3  There are significant flaws in our ability to accurately establish the total disease burden of allergy, and particularly allergic asthma. This is in part because of a lack of funding for research in this area. The UK Clinical Research Collaboration reported that research into asthma and other respiratory conditions received a disproportionately low level of funding in relation to the impact of these conditions, which represents a huge barrier to the effective development of our knowledge base.[10]

  2.4  However, perhaps an even more fundamental reason for our inability to conclusively establish the total burden of allergic disease is that current diagnostic procedures mean that it can remain unidentified. Only 30 per cent of people with asthma tell us that they have been offered allergy testing to help them to identify what triggers their asthma.[11] Skin-prick tests, which can be used to identify allergies, are not widely applied to people with asthma, meaning that the precise allergens that trigger symptoms in allergic asthma are not formally identified or recorded: this can inhibit the quality of treatment as well as preventing us from forming a complete record of the extent of allergy in the UK.

  2.5  We estimate that over 12.7 million working days are lost each year as a result of asthma, and that the total annual cost of asthma to the economy is £2.3 billion.[12] The high prevalence of allergic asthma means that a significant proportion of this cost is likely to be directly related to allergy, but unfortunately, the lack of allergy testing for people with asthma and the resulting absence of data on the people affected by it means that precise figures are unavailable. Nevertheless, the total economic impact of asthma and other allergic conditions is likely to be very substantial.

3.  TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT

  3.1  As yet it is not clear how to prevent asthma and allergy, but Asthma UK sponsors approximately £3 million of research into asthma every year. Asthma UK has developed a comprehensive research strategy to identify priorities by bringing together the expert knowledge and opinions of people with asthma, researchers, clinicians, the major UK funding agencies, the pharmaceutical industry and the Department of Health. The results of these national consultations provide a framework for the development of Asthma UK's research programme, which covers basic and clinical research. We are currently supporting 18 research projects specifically relating to allergy, which together represent a financial commitment of £2,470,758.

  3.2  In addition, Asthma UK works in partnership with the Medical Research Council to fund the MRC-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, which is a world-class centre of research into allergies and asthma based at Imperial College London and King's College London. Established in 2005, the centre aims to understand asthma better and to develop new ways of preventing and treating the condition, as well as acting as a training ground for new researchers and as a public voice for new achievements in asthma research. The creation of a centre of this kind provides a unique opportunity to translate basic science findings from the laboratory to healthcare professionals treating people with allergic asthma and will encourage scientists to fast-track the development and testing of new treatments.

  3.3  It is not certain why the rate of allergy is so high in the developed world, but there are several promising areas of research. For example, there is increasing evidence that infection with gut parasites may protect against asthma and allergy. Asthma UK and the Wellcome Trust are independently funding clinical trials to study the effects of hookworm in allergy and asthma respectively.

  3.4  Also, some studies have suggested that diet may increase a person's risk of developing asthma and allergies. For example, a recent study funded by Asthma UK showed that children born to mothers who had a low intake of vitamin E during pregnancy were five times more likely to have asthma than children whose mothers had eaten a diet high in vitamin E.[13]

  3.5  There is also clear evidence that infants who contract respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis are more likely to develop asthma later in life and in severe cases they may also be at greater risk of developing allergies. A number of antiviral therapies are in development for RSV and rhino virus infections that may potentially prevent asthma development.[14]

  3.6  Treatments for allergic asthma are also developing. Recently a novel therapy called Xolair has been developed and licensed for use in people with severe allergic asthma. It is an antibody that binds to and removes the "allergic antibody" Immunoglobulin E (IgE) from the circulation. It is currently being appraised by NICE.

  3.7  Also, specific immunotherapy aims to make an allergic person tolerant to the substance causing their allergy by injecting them with increasing doses of the substance they are allergic to until their symptoms are abolished or reduced. However it carries a risk of adverse reaction and trials are underway to administering the treatment in a quick dissolving tablet under the tongue (sub-lingual immunotherapy). This approach looks promising and might provide a new, cost effective way for people to manage their asthma.

  3.8  Nevertheless, the level of spending on research into allergic conditions is far from adequate. This is a substantial barrier to the advancement of our understanding about both the causes and treatment of allergic conditions. The Department of Health's recent review of allergy services identified a number of significant gaps in research into treatment, particularly in our understanding of effective models of service delivery and the effects of patient knowledge on treatment outcomes.[15]

4.  GOVERNMENT POLICIES

  4.1  As well as identifying weaknesses in our understanding of effective services, the Department of Health's report illustrated the poor outcomes of current service provision, which can only be remedied by improving policy. There has been a lack of strategic direction, with the result that services are not well integrated and have failed to address the problems associated with allergy. More explicit attention should be paid to allergy and allergic asthma, with better services provided in both primary and secondary care. It is important for the Government to ensure that NICE guidelines on allergy are commissioned as soon as possible in order to help structure future treatment.

  4.2  However, improving health is not solely the domain of the Department of Health, and without public health measures across government, the problems associated with allergic asthma will not be resolved. There is work to be done across government and the public sector: in training professionals working with the public to be aware of what to do in an asthma attack, in securing asthma- and allergy-friendly workplaces and in improving indoor and outdoor air quality.

  4.3  Poor housing in particular can severely exacerbate asthma symptoms. Damp conditions in particular allow common triggers for allergic asthma such as mould and house-dust mites to thrive. Public health policy and housing policy should be well co-ordinated at all levels of government, and more attention could be paid to the improvement of housing conditions with specific regard to allergy and asthma, particularly in rented accommodation. The consultation on the Code for Sustainable Homes made reference to the use of allergy minimising materials, but it remains unclear whether this will be implemented, or whether it will have any success.[16]

5.  PATIENT AND CONSUMER ISSUES

  5.1  The impact of allergies and allergic conditions on quality of life can be enormous. Some allergens are difficult to avoid, meaning that Many people with allergic asthma are forced to adjust their lifestyles to compensate for this, or live in fear of a severe asthma attack triggered by an allergen.

    "My quality of life is non-existent. I know this may sound extreme to a lot of people but I would be prepared to lose an arm and a leg if it meant my asthma would go away. I face daily restrictions in every aspect of my life. I can't go into pubs or clubs because of the smoke, I can't visit friends because of their pets and people's cigarette smoke. I also have problems visiting friends for barbecues because the smoke sets off my asthma. I find it really difficult to do day-to-day activities on my own—I don't have enough breath to push a trolley around the supermarket. It's impossible for me to go to the gym and I'm banned from the local swimming pool as the chlorine and humidity sets off my asthma. I'm too much of a liability to them. I'm not allowed on an aeroplane and it's impossible for me to get travel insurance. Winter is also a problem for me—I can't go outside because the cold air can set off my asthma." Suzanne Edwards

  5.2  A number of steps can be taken to help ensure; that patients and the public are better informed about allergy and allergic asthma. Improvements in our ability to diagnose allergy would be very beneficial, as would more specialised training for healthcare professionals, and the provision of better-structured allergy services. For example, poor knowledge about allergic conditions often stems from the lack of an integrated and holistic approach to their treatment. People with multiple allergies are forced to see multiple specialists for separate treatments rather than a single allergy specialist, with the result that they are not well informed about their allergies as a whole.

  5.3  It is also noteworthy that many people are badly informed about what it means to have an allergy, and about the difference between allergy and intolerance. In addition to the development of more robust clinical practices and better-informed health professionals, the production of accessible health promotion materials available in a variety of locations and formats may help to resolve this problem.

6.  CONCLUSIONS

  6.1  Allergy and allergic asthma do not currently receive the priority they should, in either research or services. The problems allergic conditions cause are severe for the individuals affected and for the national economy. There is a clear need for more research into the basic causes of asthma and allergy, as well as into the clinical effectiveness of different forms of treatment service to fully develop our understanding of allergic conditions. Yet, even with our current level of knowledge, it is apparent that not enough is being done to treat allergy and allergic asthma. More diagnostic testing is needed, and services across both primary and secondary care stand to be improved. Only then will people with allergic conditions get the treatment they need.

October 2006



7   Health Survey for England 2001. Joint Health Surveys Unit, 2003; The Scottish Health Survey 1998. Joint Health Surveys Unit, 2000; Census 2001 (Office for National Statistics: ONS). Back

8   Prof M Innes Asher MBChB, Stephen Montefort MD, Bengt Björkstén MD, Christopher KW Lai DM, David P Strachan MD, Stephan K Weiland MD and Hywel Williams PhD, the ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. The Lancet 2006; 368:733-743. Matthew Masoli. Denise Fabian, Shaun Holt, Richard Beasley. Global Burden of Asthma.2002. Royal College of Physicians, Allergy: the unmet need-a blueprint for better patient care, 2003. National allergy strategy group, www.bsaci.org/allergyservices.html, last accessed 26 September 2006. Back

9   Asthma UK. National Asthma Panel, 2004. Back

10   The impact of conditions was measured in Disability Adjusted Life Years. UKCRC, UK Health Research Analysis, May 2006: 27. Back

11   Asthma UK. National Asthma Panel, 2006. Back

12   Department for Work & Pensions, Information & Analysis Department. Office of Health Economics. Compendium of Health Statistics, 15th edition 2003-04. Department for Work & Pensions, Information & Analysis Department (April 2004). Back

13   Ref: Devereux G, Turner SW, Craig LC, McNeill G, Martindale S, Harbour PJ, Helms PJ, Seaton A. Low maternal vitamin E intake during pregnancy is associated with asthma in 5-year-old children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep 1;I74(5):499-507. Epub 2006 Jun 8. Back

14   Ref: Henderson J, Hilliard TN, Sherriff A, Stalker D, Al Shammari N, Thomas HM. Hospitalization for RSV bronchiolitis before 12 months of age and subsequent asthma, atopy and wheeze: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 Aug;16(5):386-92. Back

15   Department of Health. A review of services for allergy-the epidemiology, demand for and provision of treatment and effectiveness of clinical interventions. 2006. Back

16   Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Proposal for introducing a Code for Sustainable Homes. 2005. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007