|Previous Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|
Whether they plan to strengthen controls over British arms exports by (a) controlling all sales by British extra-territorial arms brokers, including military vehicles and other equipment; (b) covering the military activities of United Kingdom-owned foreign subsidiary companies; (c) requiring official approval for the re-export or transfer of military goods of which the original export was authorised; and (d) requiring that approved arms and equipment exports do not prejudice the sustainable development of poor countries. [HL1905]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office & Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Lord Jones of Birmingham): On 6 February 2008 the Government published their initial response to a public consultation carried out as part of the 2007 review of export control legislation. The response can be viewed on BERR's website at www.berr.gov.uk/europeantrade/strategic-export-control/legislation/export-control-act-2002/review/index.html.
The initial response makes a number of specific commitments to enhance the controls and covers the issues raised at points (a) and (b). However, as stressed in that response, there are a number of areas where further research and analysis is required.
The Government are extending the current extraterritorial controls to encompass the activities of UK persons anywhere in the world in relation to small arms. It is currently considering extending this beyond small arms to possibly encompass other weapons. In doing so, it will need to ensure that any new regulations are proportionate to the risk.
The Government's initial response states that they remain of the view that to attempt to control directly the activities of UK-owned foreign subsidiariesin effect to treat them as though they are based in the UKis not legally viable and would be virtually impossible to enforce.
Similarly on point (c), the Government are not convinced that requiring exporters to seek re-export approval from the UK authorities is necessary or feasible, since such a system would be onerous to operate and extremely difficult to enforce in practice outside the UK's legal jurisdiction.
On point (d), the Government consider that Criterion 8 of the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria, which requires the Government to take into account whether the proposed export would seriously undermine the
22 Feb 2008 : Column WA88
What changes they propose to make to the policies and working arrangements of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills following the signing of the CentralLocal Concordat on 12 December 2007, both in general and in specific response to the agreement in the concordat (a) that there should be a presumption that powers are best exercised at the lowest effective and practical level; (b) that central Government undertakes to progressively remove obstacles which prevent councils from pursuing their role, including reducing the burden of appraisal and approval regimes, the ring-fencing of funds for specific purposes and the volume of guidance it issues; (c) that the number of national indicators should be around 200; (d) that in relation to the negotiation of new-style local area agreements this objective will require major changes in behaviour and practice from central government departments, their agencies, government offices, councils and local partners; and what is the process and timetable for such changes. [HL1745]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (Baroness Morgan of Drefelin): The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) is fully committed to the principles set out in the Central-Local Concordat, including in particular the new performance management arrangements for local authorities and their partners, based on a single set of 198 national indicators and a limited number of targets agreed in local area agreements (LAAs). We have ensured that skills is represented in the national indicator set and are currently working closely with other government departments, government offices, Learning and Skills Council and others to agree the new LAAs with local authorities and their partners by June.
What instructions and advice are being given to Natural England concerning changes to their policies and working arrangements following the signing of the Central-Local Concordat on 12 December 2007, both in general and in specific response to the agreement in the concordat (a) that there should be a presumption that powers are best exercised at the lowest effective and practical level; (b) that central Government undertakes to progressively remove obstacles which prevent councils from pursuing their role, including reducing the burden of appraisal and approval regimes, the ring-fencing of funds for specific purposes and the volume of guidance it
22 Feb 2008 : Column WA89
The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker): The Central-Local Concordat, agreed between the Government and the Local Government Association (LGA), on behalf of local authorities in England, was signed in December last year. It commits both parties to a framework of principles to secure a new relationship between central government and local government. The operation of this agreement will be monitored on a continuing basis, through renewed Central-Local Partnership arrangements.
Statutory guidance to Natural England on its role in regional planning and associated matters, including LAAs, was issued in March 2007 following public consultation: paragraphs 5.7 and 5.8 refer. We have no plans to issue further guidance. Implementation of the guidance is a matter for the board of Natural England.
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office & Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Lord Jones of Birmingham): The management of the carbon dioxide transport and storage elements of the CCS demonstration plant being supported by the Government is a matter for the project developer. Plans for the transport and storage elements will be assessed as part of the competitive process.
What assessment has been made of the likelihood of the 5.6 billion cubic metres of new gas storage capacity outlined in the May 2007 Energy White Paper being delivered; which proposed gas storage projects expected to contribute to this new capacity are currently awaiting determination by them; and when they expect to make decisions on these projects. [HL1773]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office & Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Lord Jones of Birmingham): Underground gas storage projects with a design capacity of 2045 mcm are currently in the planning process. The great majority of these applications fall to local authorities, under the Town and Country Planning Act. However, preliminary submissions under the Gas Act 1965 in respect of two projectsat Albury and Saltfleetbyare currently being considered by the Secretary of State. There is no statutory timetable for considering applications under this Act. If the Secretary of State allows the preliminary applications, the projects would proceed to the formal application stage, when they would be fully scrutinised in the statutory process. These two projects would have a combined capacity (included in the 2045 mcm) of approximately 885 mcm.
The Government do not make probabilistic assessments that particular projects will proceed to commissioning. Whether to proceed with consented projects is a commercial decision, which will reflect technical and commercial factors. The current position is that new underground gas storage with a design capacity of some 2059 mcm, and LNG storage with a design capacity equivalent to 922 mcm of gas in gaseous form, has been consented, and is either under construction or awaiting the start of construction. In addition, expansion projects are under way at a number of existing facilities, while a number of projectssome commercially confidentialare at the development (pre-consents) stage.
The Government's most recent assessment of the outlook for gas storage is set out in BERR's Energy Markets Outlook, published in October 2007 and available at www.berr.gov.uk/energy/energymarketsoutlook/page41839.html.
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office & Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Lord Jones of Birmingham): The table below sets out the carbon emissions per megawatt hour from wind-generated electricity in 2006, compared with fossil fuels.
|Estimated carbon emissions in 2006|
|Fuel||Estimated Carbon emissions 1 (tonnes of carbon per megawatt hour (MWh) electricity supplied)|
|Source: Derived from the Digest of UK Energy Statistics (DUKES) 2007|
While there are little or no carbon emissions from the generation of electricity from wind power, there are, however, some emissions during the whole lifecycle of a wind turbine. The majority of the emissions occur during the manufacture of the turbinesfor example, steel for the tower and concrete for the foundations. Emissions generated during the operation of wind turbines arise from routine maintenance and inspection visits by road vehicles for onshore wind farms and by boat or helicopter for offshore developments.
What progress is being made with the two discarded fish pilot schemes; whether the results so far are consistent with the European Union's findings that 60 per cent of fish caught are discarded; and whether they will introduce a plan to end the requirement to discard dead fish. [HL1902]
The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker): Rates of discarding are highly variable and dependent on the local abundance of fish, individual choices made by fishermen as well as the regulatory environment in which fishermen operate. I assume that the noble Lord is referring to the Irish Sea Data Enhancement Pilot Project and the gear trials in the North Sea Farne Deeps Nephrops fishery.
The intention of the Irish Sea Data Enhancement Pilot Project is to improve the understanding of the nature and extent of discarding in the Irish Sea in order that management measures can be developed to address the problem. The initial phase of the Irish Sea Data Enhancement Pilot has recently been completed. To ensure that the data collected from the pilot are consistent with existing national programmes, data are being validated to ensure that the estimates of discards that result from the project are both realistic and representative. An interim report from the project, which will include a detailed analysis of discarding in the Irish Sea, is scheduled for June for submission to the European Commission's Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee on Fisheries (STECF).
The North Sea gear trials were conducted during the period 2003-06. The average annual estimated fish discarded by the English and Welsh fishing fleet in the North Sea Farne Deeps Nephrops fishery was 23 per cent (by number), 37 per cent (by weight). These figures are based on data obtained by the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) observers who regularly sail onboard these vessels and measure both the catches and discards.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Lord Darzi of Denham): The Secretary of State for Health is responsible principally for health issues relating to England and for certain issues which are reserved in the different devolution settlements for Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. Reserved matters are for the United Kingdom Parliament and in general any executive functions are exercised by the Secretary of State for Health, other persons, bodies or authorities. The current position in relation to each devolved administration is detailed as follows.
Schedule 3 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 sets out reserved matters on which the Northern Ireland Assembly would not normally legislate and could do so only with the Secretary of State for Health's consent, and subject to parliamentary control:
The majority of functions in relation to the provision of health services in Wales are now conferred directly on the Welsh Ministers under the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006, the prime duty being that set out in Section 1, to continue the promotion in Wales of a comprehensive health service.
Schedule 5 to the Government of Wales Act 2006 sets out fields within which, with the agreement of the UK Parliament, legislative competence may be devolved to the National Assembly for Wales to make measures. The fields include health and health services, and social welfare. The UK Parliament retains legislative responsibility for such areas until legislative competence has been conferred by adding matters to the fields under Schedule 5. To date, legislative competence has been conferred with respect to NHS Redress (a matter inserted for field 9 (health and health services)).
Part 4 of the Government of Wales Act 2006 sets out the framework under which the Assembly's legislative competence may in future be broadened to encompass power to make Acts if approval is given in a referendum. However, certain health matters will still be reserved to the UK Parliament. These are listed in Schedule 7 of the Government of Wales Act 2006:regulation of the health professions which were regulated prior to devolution;misuse of drugs;medicines, medical supplies and poisons;human fertilisation, embryology, surrogacy and genetics;welfare foods;abortion;xenotransplantation;vaccine damage payments;standards for, and testing of, biological substances; andHealth and Safety Commission, Health and Safety Executive and provision made by Health and Safety regulations.
While the settlements make clear that in relation to devolved matters, observing and implementing international obligations is within the competence of the administrations concerned, the UK Government are responsible for ensuring that international obligations are met across the UK. The Secretary of State has powers to enforce compliance with international obligations in respect of health and social care across the UK, covering devolved fields if necessary but, in the case of Scotland, the consent of the Scottish Parliament would generally be sought. In terms of the Scotland Act 1998 international obligations does not include European Community law and there is separate provision for this.
|Next Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|