|Previous Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Identity (Meg Hillier) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
Further to my Written Ministerial Statement on 25 July 2007, I am pleased to announce the following additional appointments to the ethics group that provides Ministers with independent ethical advice on the operation and practice of the national DNA database (NDNAD):
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie of Luton): My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (James Purnell) has made the following Statement.
We have made clear progress over the past decade in tackling poverty and promoting social justice. But we need to do more. We are determined that we will continue to tackle child poverty and to drive for an 80 per cent employment rate. We have become more ambitious about who we believe can work.
We will be focusing efforts on helping people on employment and support allowance to look at what they can do, not what they cant. We will also be expecting single parents to look for work when their youngest child is seven rather than 16. Achieving fair life chances for all will mean opening up second chances, through opportunities to learn, develop new skills, enter employment and make progress at work.
The employability market is large and diverse. Every year, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) spends nearly £1 billion on partnerships with the private, public and voluntary sectors. In England, the European Social Fund (ESF) finances further provision commissioned by DWP. We need to spend that money cost-effectively to get the best result for every customer and to increase the number of people going into sustained work. To achieve this, we need to achieve a step change in the performance of employment provision.
The commissioning strategys new approach to sourcing, procuring and managing employability provision will harness the innovation and expertise of the private, third and public sectors to support people into work. This strategy implements a key part of the
28 Feb 2008 : Column WS82
The commissioning strategy is a major milestone in our welfare reform programme and provides a comprehensive and compelling vision of the way we will work with providers. It aligns clearly with the ambitions of other developments, such as the Leitch review of skills, the report of the National Employment Panels Business Commission on Race Equality in the Workplace and the joint Communities and Local Government/Department for Work and Pensions paper on area-based strategies to reduce worklessness in England.
We are creating a market for the long termwe are committed to this and want to help to develop a critical mass of providers who will work with us in delivering personalised services for each individual that focus on work or work-related activity for those clients who will benefit. The strategy takes us away from a mindset of top-down control and devolves initiative and innovation to the front line. Furthermore, it sets out the high value we place on developing long-term relationships with partners who demonstrate that they share our commitment, including those commitments in the public sector statutory duties, to promote equality through all we do.
We have consulted extensively with existing and potential providers, other parts of government, representative groups, employer organisations and other stakeholders, as well as reviewing the responses to the consultation exercise. We have also sought to learn from best practice internationally: from the United States, Australia and the Netherlands. However, our ambition is to make our employability provision even more advanced and effective in its conception and delivery. We want our welfare provision to be a world leader in increasing skillsand in tackling worklessness.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Lord Darzi of Denham): My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Health (Alan Johnson) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
On 16 April 2007, my right honourable friend the former Secretary of State for Health announced an independent review to examine the processes underlying modernising medical careers and to make recommendations to ensure that any necessary improvements could be implemented for 2008 and the future.
The review that he chaired was conducted independently of the four health departments and had its own independent secretariat. Its interim report was published on 8 October 2007. Following consultation with the medical profession and others involved, the final report of the review was published on 8 January this year.
Sir John and his colleagues have produced an excellent, wide-ranging review of the serious problems that arose within specialty training in 2007, the causes of those problems, and what needs to change as a result of them.
I would like to thank Sir John, his colleagues on the review, and all organisations and individuals who have given evidence to it and responded to its interim report. The Tooke review marks a significant step forward in ensuring that excellence and high achievement remain at the heart of medical education and training in this country.
Progress has already been made. For example, one of the key lessons of 2007 was the need to develop policy and process in consultation with the medical profession, the NHS and others involved. That is why we have established the MMC programme board. Over half the boards members are drawn from the medical profession. I have accepted all the programme boards recommendations. The complexity of this area of policy means that there are 47 separate sets of recommendations to consider within Sir Johns interim and final reports.
While not all of them are the direct responsibility of the department, we accept the overwhelming majority of Sir Johns recommendations. For example, we accept Sir Johns recommendation that the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) and the General Medical Council (GMC) should merge to establish a single organisation for standards in medical education and training.
A small number of Sir Johns recommendations have implications that we need to consider very carefully. As Sir Johns report itself makes clear, the reform of postgraduate medical training should proceed in an evidence-based way, in which structures of governance and accountability are made clear, and in which training is carefully dovetailed with the needs of patients and other policy considerations.
My noble friend Lord Darzi of Denham is currently leading a next-stage review of the National Health Service. Workforce planning, education and the role of the doctor are crucial parts of my noble friends review. One of Sir Johns most far-reaching recommendationsthe establishment of a new organisation to oversee postgraduate medical education and training in Englandwill therefore need to be carefully considered alongside this work.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Communities and Local Government (Baroness Andrews): My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Iain Wright) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
The housing market renewal programme has made a major contribution to restoring confidence in some of the most disadvantaged areas of the country. I am therefore pleased to announce that we will be making a further £1.038 billion available to the programme over the period 2008-11.
|Proposed distribution across individual years|
This is substantial new funding and, together with increasing investment from the private sector and support from local authorities and others, it will help the market renewal areas to take forward their ambitious programmes to bring real change to places that only five years ago were facing decline and abandonment.
Since the housing market renewal programme began in 2002, we have invested £1.2 billion, which has helped to refurbish over 40,000 homes, demolish 10,000 properties and construct 1,100 new homes. As the National Audit Office recognised in its report on the programme published last year, all the pathfinders have succeeded in closing the gaps in prices with their regions, and housing markets in local authorities chosen for intervention have, on the whole, performed better than those in other local authorities not chosen for intervention that had the most similar problems of low demand.
The new funding that I am announcing today will help to take forward this work. Three-year funding will provide greater certainty for the housing market renewal partnerships to address long-term market failure. At the same time, we want the partnerships to ensure that they are making appropriate connections to wider housing strategies and making links with growth programmes where relevant.
Figures for year 1 (2008-09) are firm commitments. Those for years 2 and 3 (2009-10 and 2010-11) are indicative and may change by up to plus or minus 10 per cent. These numbers will be confirmed at a later point and will be subject to a number of factors, including progress in working with the new Homes and Communities Agency, progress in making links with growth initiatives, where relevant, and future changes in local markets.
|Next Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|