Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Baroness Andrews: My Lords, I cannot confirm that, so I shall have to write to the noble Baroness. What I can say is that we are working with industry across a whole range of fronts to provide incentives
3 Mar 2008 : Column 868
Lord Dearing: My Lords, in view of the limited progress made by the Government in achieving the 2010 carbon emissions target and in view of the importance of domestic boilers in this regard, will they consider making it a requirement that by, say, 2020, all boilers, including those already installed, will have to meet certain efficiency standards?
Baroness Andrews: My Lords, as I have said, we are making real progress towards the introduction of condensing boilers, and I think that we are making good progress in terms of the 2010 target. Our assumed savings by that date are going to be in the order of 4 million tonnes from all dwellings. I will think hard about what the noble Lord has said because it is an important point.
Baroness Walmsley: My Lords, does the Minister accept that it is rather naive to suggest, as she did in her first Answer, that there is 100 per cent compliance with the regulations? Has she not heard, as I have, some of the horror stories told by owners moving into new-build houses and finding less than the proper amount of insulation in the roof, or even none at all? How many builders have been penalised for such breaches?
Baroness Andrews: My Lords, we have some anecdotal evidence of the absence of compliance. Part of the problem with regard to insulation is that it is concealed, and that is why we are now taking systematic samples. I have no knowledge of prosecutions, and I am not entirely certain that we actually collect the data. However, I shall certainly get back to the noble Baroness about this.
Lord Waddington asked Her Majestys Government:
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, the detailed plans for the roll-out of identity cards have yet to be finalised, so it is not possible to give an estimation of the number of cards that will have been issued by 2010. However, I expect that updated plans will be published shortly.
Lord Waddington: My Lords, I thank the Minister most warmly for his reply. First, can he tell us how it came about that the records of 3 million driving licence applicants were shipped off to America and lost in the depths of Iowa, so what guarantee can he give that entries in the identity register will not end up in Timbuktu? Secondly, how will the issue of cards to non-European foreigners applying to stay herelaw-abiding people who come forward voluntarilyhelp in the fight against illegal immigration, let alone terrorism; and yet am I not right that the issue of such cards to non-European foreigners is going to be almost first on the list?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, the noble Lord is right: it is our intention later this year to roll out the first tranche of identity cards for foreign nationals. We already have a roll-out for the UK visas biometrics programme internationally which now covers three-quarters of the worlds population and operates in 135 countries. So far, that scheme has ensured that some 10,000 individuals have been matched to those who have been fingerprinted in the United Kingdom in connection with previous asylum applications. So it is already encouraging in its results in further enhancing the protection of our borders and in protecting us from illegal immigration. I am not aware of any plans to send data to Timbuktu or anywhere else. I am sure the noble Lord was being facetious.
Lord Acton: My Lords, is my noble friend aware that the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, spoke of the depths of Iowa? As an honorary citizen of Iowa, I am horrified at such an expression. Iowa has nothing but joys.
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, strange as it may seem, when the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, mentioned Iowa, the noble Lord, Lord Acton, came first to mind, and I knew that he would be incensed.
Baroness Hanham: My Lords, can the Minister tell the House whether the computer systems for dealing with biometric ID cards are in place? If they are not, when will they be? Are the Government satisfied that they will be able to cope with the new biometric ID cards as they are rolled out?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, the computer system is not yet in place. We are in the early stages of the procurement process for that. We are making good progress in developing our plans for the introduction of ID cards. As I said earlier, we plan to introduce them for foreign nationals in the United Kingdom later this year. I suppose the question for me is: do the opposition parties still support the introduction of ID cards for foreign nationals? My sense is that they do not. I think they are making a big mistake in that because there is no doubt in my mind and the minds of their own national security and police advisers that ID cards will make a great contribution to ensuring that we can secure our borders and protect ourselves from illegal immigration.
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer: My Lords, speaking for the Liberal Democrat Benches, I can assure the noble Lord that we think the money would be far better spent on proper measures to secure our borders and anti-terrorist intelligence work, apart from anything else. What is the latest cost estimate, first, for each individual who has to get a card; secondly, to the taxpayer for bringing in the whole scheme; and, lastly, for any business which has to implement it?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The noble Baroness asks an important question. We have been very clear and up frontit is worth listening to the responsethat roughly 70 per cent of the costs of introducing ID cards would be required in any event to ensure that the full secure biometric passports are introduced. So most of the costs are fully recovered. The remainder of the costs are recovered by the issuing of the identity cards. I know that some Conservative Members have the notion that somehow we could use the same £5.4 billion-worth of funding simply to enhance the security of our borders through the development of an extensive army of border security staff, but that is completely unrealistic. That money is already going to be spent on ensuring that we have a fully biometric passport system.
Lord Wright of Richmond: My Lords, can the Minister tell the House what is the current prospect for the Government signing up to Schengen information system mark 2?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, I was looking forward to a helpful observation. I will write to the noble Lord on that; I want to ensure that he has an accurate answer.
Baroness Gardner of Parkes: My Lords, as an Australian, do I qualify as a non-EU foreigner, although I have not been an asylum seeker? If so, will I be the first person in this House to get an identity card? Will I have an option, or will I be obliged to have it?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, I think the noble Baroness has just volunteered for the scheme. I wish her luck being first in the queue.
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock: My Lords, has my noble friend seen the widespread predictions that the Conservatives will return to supporting identity cards when they perceive themselves to be near to power again? Should he and I not welcome this continued vehement opposition?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, the position of the Conservative Party on ID cards is interesting. Back in June 1994, I think it was the MP Harold Elletson who moved a Motion to introduce ID cards. The noble Lord, Lord Trimble, supported that Motion, as did the noble Lords, Lord Lamont and Lord Jopling. My research also shows me that three current shadow Secretaries of State in Mr Camerons shadow Cabinet and a number of other shadow Ministers supported the Motion, so it seems that the Conservative Party is deeply divided on this issue.
Lord Skelmersdale: My Lords, if overseas immigrants are to get cards but the computer system is in the early stages of procurement, what is the use of the cards until the computer programme is up and running?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, this is going to be a highly sophisticated system.
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, noble Lords opposite have been in government and have also introduced highly sophisticated systems. The system will work to ensure that we protect our borders against terrorists and illegal immigrants and that we get people using services that are entirely proper for them to use in a fair sense.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie of Luton): My Lords, I beg to move the first Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft regulations laid before the House on 14 January be approved. 7th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Lord McKenzie of Luton.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie of Luton): My Lords, I beg to move the second Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft order laid before the House on 23 January be approved. 8th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Lord McKenzie of Luton.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie of Luton): My Lords, I beg to move the third Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft order laid before the House on 23 January be approved. 8th Report from the Joint
3 Mar 2008 : Column 872
On Question, Motion agreed to.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie of Luton): My Lords, I beg to move the fourth Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft order laid before the House on 23 January be approved. 9th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Lord McKenzie of Luton.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: My Lords, I beg to move the first Motion standing in the name of my noble friend Lady Morgan of Drefelin on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft order laid before the House on 16 January be approved. 7th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Baroness Royall of Blaisdon.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: My Lords, I beg to move the second Motion standing in the name of my noble friend Lady Morgan on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft order laid before the House on 16 January be approved. 7th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Baroness Royall of Blaisdon.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: My Lords, I beg to move the third Motion standing in the name of my noble friend Lady Morgan on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft regulations laid before the House on 14 November 2007 be approved. 2nd Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Baroness Royall of Blaisdon.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: My Lords, I beg to move the fourth Motion standing in the name of my noble friend Lady Morgan on the Order Paper.
Moved, That the draft regulations laid before the House on 7 January be approved. 6th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Considered in Grand Committee on 26 February.(Baroness Royall of Blaisdon.)
On Question, Motion agreed to.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now again resolve itself into Committee on this Bill.
Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.
House in Committee accordingly.
[The LORD SPEAKER in the Chair.]
Baroness Butler-Sloss moved Amendment No. 117:
(1) Where a person aged under 18 comes before the court, in circumstances in which a question may arise with respect to the welfare of that person, the court may direct the appropriate authority to undertake an investigation of the circumstances of that person.
(2) If the court decides to direct an investigation, the provisions of section 37 (sections 2 to 6) of the Children Act 1989 (c. 41) shall apply.
(3) Pending the investigation by the local authority concerned, the case of the person before the court shall be adjourned.
(4) Upon receiving the information from the local authority concerned, the court shall decide whether to hear the case or dismiss the summons or adjourn the case generally.
The noble and learned Baroness said: I shall speak also to Amendment No. 118. These two alternative amendments are intended to apply to children under the age of 14. It may be better from a drafting point of view for the amendment to specify the age of under 18 and indicate in guidance that it is intended to apply to those under 14.
Last week, the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, when speaking to an earlier amendment, quite rightly corrected me for saying that some children are bad. I had incorrectly put what I had intended to say, which is, of course, that I do not consider that children are born bad, but that some become consistent offenders and therefore need to be dealt with on that basis.
The amendments, however, are intended to address the younger child, under 14, whose offending is not yet very serious. He may be a first offender, or offender in relation to quite trivial offences, who may be seen also as a victim. As has been said several times
3 Mar 2008 : Column 874
Next Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |