Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page



12 Mar 2008 : Column 1548

(a) for “An order under this section is” substitute “The orders specified in this subsection are”,(b) the word “or” at the end of paragraph (a) is omitted, and(c) after paragraph (b) insert—“(c) an order that the accused be released without bail.”(a) the Appeal Court have made an order within subsection (1A)(c), or(b) the Appeal Court have made an order within subsection (1A)(a) or (b) but the order has ceased to have effect by virtue of subsection (2) or the accused has been released or discharged by virtue of subsection (3).” ”“Consecutive custodial sentences“Dangerous offenders(a) a person aged 18 or over is convicted by the Court Martial of an offence under section 42 (criminal conduct),(b) the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is a serious offence, and(c) the court is of the required opinion (defined by section 223).”(a) a person aged 18 or over is convicted by the Court Martial of an offence under section 42 (criminal conduct),(b) the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is a specified offence,(c) the court is of the required opinion (defined by section 223), and

12 Mar 2008 : Column 1549

(d) where the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is a serious offence, the case is not one in which the court is required by section 225(2) of the 2003 Act (as applied by section 219(2) of this Act) to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life.”(a) for “section 227” substitute “section 227(2) to (5)”,(b) before paragraph (a) insert—“(za) the reference in section 227(2A) to “the offence” is to be read as a reference to the offence under section 42 of this Act;”, and(c) in paragraph (a) for “subsection (2)(b)” substitute “subsection (2C)(b)”.(a) a person aged under 18 is convicted by the Court Martial of an offence under section 42 (criminal conduct),(b) the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is a serious offence, and(c) the court is of the required opinion (defined by section 223).”(a) for the words from the beginning to “is” substitute “In section 226(2) of the 2003 Act (as applied subsection (2))”, and(b) in paragraphs (a) and (b) the words “in section 226(2)” are omitted.(a) for “section 228” substitute “section 228(2) to (5)”, and(b) in paragraph (a) for “subsection (2)(b)” substitute “subsection (2C)(b)”.

12 Mar 2008 : Column 1550

(a) a sentence has been imposed on any person under section 225(3) or 227(2) of the 2003 Act (as applied by section 219(2) or 220(2) of this Act),(b) the condition in section 225(3A) or (as the case may be) 227(2A) of the 2003 Act was met but the condition in section 225(3B) or (as the case may be) 227(2B) of that Act was not, and(c) any previous conviction of his without which the condition in section 225(3A) or (as the case may be) 227(2A) would not have been met has been subsequently set aside on appeal.”(a) for “to 222” substitute “, 221”, and(b) for “any of sections 225 to 228” substitute “section 225(2) or 226(2)”. (a) in subsection (1) for “falling to be imposed as a result of section 219(2) or 221(2)” substitute “imposed under section 225 or 226 of the 2003 Act (as applied by section 219(2) or 221(2) of this Act)”, and(b) in subsection (3) for “required minimum sentences” substitute “ sentences that may or must be imposed”.“Restrictions on imposing community punishment(a) a community punishment may be awarded in respect of an offence, or(b) particular restrictions on liberty may be imposed by a community punishment,does not require a court to award such a punishment or to impose those restrictions.”(a) the word “Accordingly” is omitted; and(b) for “151(2) of the 2003 Act as applied by this section” substitute “270B(4)”.

12 Mar 2008 : Column 1551

(a) a person who is guilty of such an offence is liable to imprisonment; or(b) in any other case, section 270B(4) confers power to award such a punishment.(a) a person guilty of the current offence is liable to imprisonment,(b) the offender was aged 16 or over when he was convicted;(c) on three or more previous occasions the offender has, on conviction by a court for an offence committed by him after attaining the age of 16, had passed on him a sentence consisting only of a fine; and(d) despite the effect of section 238(1)(b), the court would not (apart from this section) regard the current offence, or the combination of the current offence and one or more offences associated with it, as being serious enough to warrant a community punishment.(a) a person guilty of the current offence is not liable to imprisonment;(b) the offender was aged 16 or over when he was convicted; and(c) on three or more previous occasions the offender has, on conviction by a court for an offence committed by him after attaining the age of 16, had passed on him a sentence consisting only of a fine.(a) the nature of the offences to which the previous convictions mentioned in subsection (2)(c) or (3)(c) (as the case may be) relate and their relevance to the current offence; and(b) the time that has elapsed since the offender’s conviction of each of those offences(a) a conviction by a civilian court in any part of the United Kingdom for a service offence or for an offence punishable by the law of that part of the United Kingdom; or(b) a conviction in service disciplinary proceedings.

12 Mar 2008 : Column 1552

(a) “service disciplinary proceedings” means proceedings (whether or not before a court) in respect of a service offence; and(b) any reference to a conviction or sentence, in the context of such proceedings, includes anything that under section 376(1) to (3) is to be treated as a conviction or sentence.”“Imposition of unpaid work requirement for breach of service community order or overseas service community order“Suspended prison sentences: further conviction or breach of requirement(a) in the substituted text of sub-paragraph (2), after “Part 12” insert “of this Act or under Part 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991”; and(b) in the substituted text of sub-paragraph (3), after “287” insert “of the Armed Forces Act 2006”.”

On Question, amendments agreed to.

Schedule 35, as amended, agreed to.

Clause 196 [Orders, rules and regulations]:

Lord Bach moved Amendment No. 177P:

(a) a statutory instrument containing an order under section 201,(b) a statutory instrument containing an order under paragraph 26(5) of Schedule 1,(c) a statutory instrument containing an Order in Council under paragraph 9 of Schedule 27, or(d) a statutory instrument to which subsection (3) applies.”

The noble Lord said: This government amendment and the ones that go with it are minor technical amendments. The Bill as it stands does not make provision for a single statutory instrument to be made combining provisions that attract the negative procedure and provisions that attract the affirmative procedure. These amendments make provision for a single statutory instrument to be made combining provisions attracting the negative procedure and provisions attracting the affirmative procedure. The amendments make it clear that such a combined statutory instrument would require the affirmative procedure. I understand that this type of provision is not unusual.

I give an example from this large Bill. The provisions on violent offender orders that the Committee debated contain order-making powers, some of which require a negative resolution under Clause 150 and some of which require an affirmative resolution, for example under Clauses 157 to 160. It is conceivable that we might bring forward a single

12 Mar 2008 : Column 1553

order relating to violent offender orders. Under these amendments, that entire order would be considered through the affirmative principle. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

5.30 pm

Lord Bach moved Amendments Nos. 177Q to 178ZZA:

On Question, amendments agreed to.

Clause 196, as amended, agreed to.

Clause 197 agreed to.

Schedule 36 [Minor and consequential amendments]:

Lord Bach moved Amendment No. 178ZA:

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Lord Bach moved Amendment No. 178A:

“Criminal Justice Act 1987 (c.38)

The noble Lord said: This is a government amendment to put right something that was not done as it should have been in the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. It is the Government’s policy for the Advocate General for Northern Ireland to exercise superintending powers over the Serious Fraud Office in Northern Ireland following devolution of justice matters. The amendment gives effect to this policy.

I should take a minute to set out the background. The Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002, which some noble Lords present will remember well, prepared for the devolution of criminal justice matters in Northern Ireland by providing for the appointment of an Advocate General for Northern Ireland who would assume responsibility for matters relating to prosecutions that would not be within the competence of the devolved Administration. We intend that the office of Advocate General for Northern Ireland should be held by the Attorney-General for England and Wales for the time being.

Prosecution matters in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are, of course, currently the responsibility of the Attorney-General. The 2002 Act makes provision for the responsibility for prosecutorial matters in Northern Ireland to be removed from the Attorney-General and given either to the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland or transferred to the Advocate General for Northern Ireland. However, the superintendence of the work of the Serious Fraud Office in Northern

12 Mar 2008 : Column 1554

Ireland was inadvertently overlooked. This amendment ensures that the Advocate General for Northern Ireland exercises superintending powers over the Serious Fraud Office in Northern Ireland following devolution of justice matters. I beg to move.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page