Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
The processing and storing of data overseas is allowed because NCS Pearson Inc has safe harbor status. This is the standard by which US companies ensure they adhere to the eighth data protection principle of the Data Protection Act 1988 which governs the transfer of data outside the European Economic Area. Safe harbor is recognised by the Information Commissioner as providing an adequate level of protection for the purposes of that principle.
Lord Christopher asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether the forthcoming review of biofuels production by the Renewable Fuels Agency will include examination of greenhouse gas emissions directly and indirectly resulting from (a) the production and transport of seed; (b) the agricultural processes in growing and harvesting crops, including use of fertilisers; (c) the transport and processing of crops to produce fuel; and (d) the subsequent production and distribution of fuel; and [HL3077]
Whether the forthcoming review of biofuels production by the Renewable Fuels Agency will examine the impact of biofuel production on both the price and supply of food and animal feed. [HL3078]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The terms of reference of the Renewable Fuels Agency's review into the indirect effects of biofuels production were published on 13 March 2008 on the websites of the Department for Transport and the Renewable Fuels Agency. The terms of reference can be found at www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/rtfo/biofuelsreviewtor.
To give more detail on the scope of the review, the Renewable Fuels Agency recently published a progress bulletin. This sets out in some detail the six key questions that the review will address and also describes the individual studies that are being undertaken to help address those questions. The progress bulletin can be found on the Renewable Fuel Agency's website at www.dft.gov.uk/rfa/reportsand publications/reviewoftheindirecteffectsofbiofuels.cfm.
Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:
In the light of the press release by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 2 April, how many one-stop advice centres will be established by the Energy Saving Trust to deliver the broader programme for green homes. [HL3049]
The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker): The Energy Saving Trust will be rolling out and equipping a nationwide network of 21 regional advice centres in England. These will provide a one-stop shop offering consumers a range of free and impartial advice on energy efficiency, microgeneration and renewable energy, low carbon transport, water efficiency and waste reduction, as well as a range of independent services that will help them act upon this advice.
Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:
What percentage of a bid for funding from the Environmental Transformation Fund will need to be funded from a local alliance of organisations wishing to help transform the environmental performance of a street or local area. [HL3050]
The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker): On 2 April, my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Environment (Hilary Benn) announced his intention to launch a Green Neighbourhoods competition. The competition aims to help up to 100 streets and local areas across England to reduce their carbon footprint by 60 per cent, with a focus on demonstrating what can be achieved with hard to treat, older housing stock.
This initiative will be delivered by the Energy Saving Trust, and backed by potentially more than £10 million over the next three years from the UK Environmental Transformation Fund. It will call for local alliances between householders, community groups, local authorities, energy suppliers, private companies, and banks to bid for funding. To receive funding from the Environmental Transformation Fund, bidders will need to join together and commit some funding from their own resources to transform the environmental performance of a street or local area.
Decisions have yet to be taken on the exact scope of the scheme and the amount of co-funding that will be required.
The Earl of Dundee asked Her Majesty's Government:
What further plans they have to assist states on the eastern boundary of the European Union through the European Union Neighbourhood Policy. [HL3045]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): The UK welcomes the Commission's communication of 3 April, Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2007, and its accompanying country progress reports, and will continue to support the Commission and European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) partners in building on the achievements outlined.
We support the continuing development of ENP as a means of bringing security, stability and prosperity to our eastern and southern neighbours, in line with our Global Europe strategy. An important principle of ENP is differentiation, tailoring assistance to each partner's needs, capacity and ambition for its relations with the EU. We believe this approach best accommodates the interests of each individual neighbour. We want to keep the door open to EU membership for Ukraine and other European countries which might one day meet the membership criteria.
Through our annual contributions to the EU budget, the UK contributes around £120 million per annum towards the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument which supports the implementation of the ENP.
Lord Dykes asked Her Majesty's Government:
What proposals they intend to submit to the committee chaired by Felipe Gonzalez which is considering the future of Europe after the Lisbon treaty. [HL2959]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): There was clear consensus at the December 2007 European Council on the mandate for the Reflection Group, namely: strengthening and modernising the European model of economic success and social responsibility, enhancing the competitiveness of the EU, the rule of law, sustainable development as a fundamental objective of the EU, global stability, migration, energy and climate protection, and the fight against global insecurity, international crime and terrorism. The Government will work with the group to ensure that this mandate is fulfilled and that the Government's Global Europe agenda is reflected in its work.
Lord Tebbit asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they know what the legal status of the European Union flag is in the United Kingdom and in the rest of the European Union. [HL2903]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): The EU flag has no legal status in the UK or the rest of the EU.
The EU flag originated on 25 October 1955 when the Council of Europe parliamentary assembly took the unanimous decision to adopt a flag as its emblem. The Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers adopted it as the European flag on 8 December 1955. In 1985, the European flag was adopted as the official emblem of the then European Communities by heads of state and government. EU institutions have been using it since 1986.
Baroness Cox asked Her Majesty's Government:
What their response is to the evidence provided by Philip Balmforth concerning the disappearance of Asian girls from schools and his concerns that they have been subjected to forced marriages. [HL2990]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): The Government are committed to tackling the unacceptable practice of forced marriage. Reports of children missing from schools, who may or may not be victims of forced marriage, are taken very seriously. The joint, Foreign and Commonwealth Office/Home Office Forced Marriage
22 Apr 2008 : Column WA283
Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:
Further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 3 December 2007 (WA 170) and 25 March (WA 80), whether in negotiating the draft European Convention on Access to Official Documents they have sought to persuade the Council of Europe Steering Committee for Human Rights to include within an overarching framework of minimum standards: (a) a general guarantee of the right of access to official documents; (b) a general right of access to information held by legislative bodies, judicial bodies and private bodies that exercise public functions; (c) a right of access to an appellate authority to challenge a denial of access to information; and (d) a specific provision governing the reservations to the convention which may be made; and, if not, whether they regard each of these as minimum standards. [HL2868]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): The Government did not make any proposals to amend the draft Convention on Access to Official Documents drawn up by the group of specialists on access to official documents (of which the UK is a member). The consensus among member states was that the draft convention should not become a dead letter convention, but one that established a set of principles governing the right of access to official documents which as many countries as possible could sign. The draft convention already contained a provision for a right of access to an appellate authority to challenge a denial of access to information, but the Government did seek to persuade the Steering Committee on Human Rights that the term denial should be interpreted broadly to encompass any situation where access to information had been made ineffective. No proposal was made to limit the areas in which a reservation may be made. In accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, a state can formulate a reservation to the convention on signature and ratification as long as it is compatible with the objective and purpose of the treaty.
Baroness Barker asked Her Majesty's Government:
How much they spend on (a) primary mental health care, and (b) secondary mental health care; and [HL2744]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Lord Darzi of Denham): The total gross expenditure for mental health services in 2006-07 was £9.126 billion for all persons, according to the Department of Health resource account budgeting.
Data on primary care mental health expenditure are not collected centrally by the department.
The department does not collect data on expenditure on talking therapies centrally.
Current funding arrangements mean that strategic health authorities (SHAs) are responsible for overall financial balance in their areas. Primary care trusts (PCTs) are allocated resources on the basis of the relative needs of their local populations. It is for PCTs, in partnership with SHAs and other local stakeholders, to determine how best to use their funds to meet national and local priorities.
Lord Hoyle asked the Chairman of Committees:
Further to his Written Answer on 3 April (WA 188), why the bacon served in the River Restaurant and the cafeteria in 2 Millbank is not British. [HL3165]
The Chairman of Committees (Lord Brabazon of Tara): The River Restaurant and 2 Millbank Cafeteria cater predominately for staff and operate with the objective of using ingredients of quality and keen purchase price in order to keep the menu pricing at an affordable level for staff. As the purchase price of English back bacon is 76 per cent higher per kilogram than the Dutch equivalent, purchase of English back bacon would not meet the objective of keeping the menu pricing at an affordable level for staff.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they support the member states of the United Nations Human Rights Council seeking to protect the terms of reference of the social rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; and what is their stance on the amendment proposed by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference proposed at the seventh session of the Human Rights Council. [HL2869]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): The UK supports the work of the UN Human Rights Council's special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. For this reason, the UK voted against an amendment to a resolution renewing the mandate of the special rapporteur put forward by Pakistan, on behalf of the
22 Apr 2008 : Column WA285
We fully accept that limitations to the exercise of the right to freedom of expression may be permitted in certain circumstances under international human rights law. Other Human Rights Council mechanisms address this issue, including the newly agreed mandate of the special rapporteur on racism and religious freedom. But we were concerned at the way the amendment sought to shift the focus of the mandate away from looking at what states do in violation of the right to freedom of expression towards looking at what is appropriate for individuals to say.
Unfortunately, the amendment was carried. This led the UK and other western states to abstain on the resolution as a whole. Nevertheless, the special rapporteur's mandate was renewed for a further three years. The UK will continue to support the work of this special rapporteur.
Lord Taylor of Holbeach asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether the national identity card will contain information on, or directions to information on, (a) prison records, (b) entries on the sex offenders register, (c) anti-social behaviour orders and (d) overseas convictions; and [HL3008]
Whether identity cards issued to immigrants will contain information on criminal convictions in their countries of origin. [HL3009]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): No information relating to criminal records or convictions will be held on identity cards. Identity cards will hold information relating to an individual's identity and the precise detail of the information to be contained on the card will be prescribed in regulations to be approved by Parliament under Section 6 of the Identity Cards Act 2006, and for cards issued to foreign nationals under Section 5(2)(d) of the UK Borders Act 2007.
Lord Laird asked Her Majesty's Government:
How many members of (a) the Ulster Defence Regiment and (b) the Royal Irish Regiment were murdered in Northern Ireland from 1970 to 1998; and in each case how many led to successful convictions. [HL2410]
Lord Rooker: The following table shows that 203 members of the UDR/RIR were murdered in Northern Ireland during the period 1970 to 1998.
Details regarding convictions for such cases are not recorded.
Year | UDR/RIR* |
* Figures include Royal Irish Regiment (Home Service Battalions). |
Next Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |