|Previous Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (Baroness Morgan of Drefelin): I have today issued a revised Explanatory Memorandum, following additional government amendments agreed at Report Stage in the other place, in relation to the Education and Skills Bill (Welsh Framework Powers). Copies are available in the Printed Paper Office, the Library and the Wales Office website at www.walesoffice.gov.uk.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Baroness Vadera): The following Statement provides information on the Competitiveness Council in Brussels on 29 May 2008, at which I represented the UK. The meeting was chaired by Andrej Vizjak, Slovenian Minister of Economy, and Gregor Virant, Slovenian Minister of Public Administration.
The council held a debate on competitiveness and innovation in European industry, and adopted conclusions agreeing on the goal of making the EU a more dynamic and competitive, knowledge-based, safe and sustainable low-carbon economy, in order to achieve sustainable growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion. The conclusions emphasise the importance of removing barriers to innovation and reducing the fragmentation of European venture capital markets, the potential contribution of pre-commercial procurement, and the need to implement measures to fight climate change and improve the competitiveness of the metals, forest-based and defence industries. I intervened to emphasise the importance of further work to reduce the regulatory burden on small firms, to improve access to venture capital in the EU, to achieve greater energy efficiency and achieve the transition to a low-carbon economy, and to develop skills levels in the EU.
Following a presentation by the Commission on its second strategic review of the better regulation initiative, the council adopted conclusions calling for further action on impact assessment, the reduction of administrative burdens, and the simplification of EU legislation. I intervened in the debate to stress the need for a net target for burden reductions and for ambitious company law simplification proposals, including exclusions for the smallest companies.
The council took note of a progress report on the future development of an EU patent system, and held an exchange of views on progress on patent litigation and the Community patent. I intervened to note the much higher cost of patents in the EU than in Japan and the US, and to urge rapid progress to resolve outstanding concerns in order to achieve an efficient,
9 Jun 2008 : Column WS34
Under other business, the Commission gave brief progress reports on the draft toy safety directive, the Small Business Act for Europe initiative, cohesion policy strategies and programmes for 2007-13, transposition of the services directive and the draft regulation on CO2 emissions from cars. The presidency gave a brief report on the outcome of the Informal Competitiveness Council in April. Portugal made brief interventions about fees charged by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and the effect of rising oil prices on the EU economy.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Baroness Vadera): I am pleased to confirm the agenda items for which BERR has responsibility at the forthcoming Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council (Telecoms Council) in Luxembourg on 12 June 2008.
The first substantive item on the agenda is a presidency progress report on the European Commission proposals on a review of regulatory framework for electronic communication networks and services (telecoms). The Slovenian presidency is expected to pose three (written) questions in the debate:whether the revised framework is able to incentivise investment in next generation access networks (NGN)the successor to broadband;the extent to which regulatory bodies should be independent, and whether more consistency in the approach that national regulatory authorities (NRAs) take would be of benefit; and, Ministers views on the best way to achieve a common vision on spectrum management in the EU.
In line with the views of both committees, the Government have never been convinced of the case of a new pan-EU regulator. I noted with interest the output of the House of Commons debate on 18 March 2008 and the conclusions of the House of Lords debate on 14 March 2008 entitled the Single Market: Wallflower or Dancing Partner? You will be reassured to know that none of my opposite numbers in other member states, or indeed the views from the European Parliament, support the Commissions original proposals. Together with like-minded Ministers, I intend to use this discussion over lunch with Commissioner Reding to reiterate our views on the elements necessary for an independent advisory body to build upon existing arrangements and strengthen the application of the framework. My officials have been working closely with officials from the incoming French presidency in developing their alternative to the Commissions agency proposals on which the French Minister and I will look to galvanise member state support. Essentially
9 Jun 2008 : Column WS35
Focusing on the three questions we expect the Slovenian presidency to pose, I intend to take the opportunity in response to the first of these to make an intervention on the need for this framework to be technologically neutral, and provide NRAs the necessary power, including new powers of functional separation, to promote efficient infrastructure investment in those parts of the network which are replicable, and to ensure access on non-discriminatory terms to those elements which are likely to be enduring economic bottlenecks. What we do not want is an outcome which enables member states to unfairly favour incumbents deployment of fibre networks by excusing them of their obligations to ensure non-discriminatory access.
On the second question, I intend to take the opportunity to emphasise the importance the UK attaches to independent regulators separated from market participants and the day-to-day pressure of politics. However, I will also push for a higher level of ambition, so that rather than focusing on achieving consistency (whether that be consistently good or consistently bad) we should be focusing on developing a process that continually raises the bar in regulatory performance across the EU. During this intervention I will also reconfirm our commitment to work with other member states to find a satisfactory mechanism of constraining a Commission veto on national market remedies to target the laggards, without constraining regulatory innovation and causing unnecessary additional hurdles in those member states which are already applying the framework with considerable success.
In addressing the last of their questions, I intend to emphasise that while it is appropriate for member states to have sufficient flexibility to support clearly defined public policy purposes, we are strongly of the view that the market is best placed to manage spectrum. I share the views, which I expect to be expressed by several Ministers, that harmonisation can bring benefits through economies of scale and interoperability. However, I will make it clear that enforced (regulatory) harmonisation runs the risk of spectrum being underused if services do not develop as expected. For this reason I believe that market-led harmonisation, achieved through a technologyand serviceneutral approach, is more appropriate as it can adapt to changing market conditions and avoid inefficient use of spectrum.
I am aware of, and grateful for, both committees interest in this important package. I can report that in addition to instructing my officials to work closely with their opposite numbers and the European Parliament, I have held successful bilateral meetings with the French, and in advance of this council meeting will have met with Commissioner Reding and my German and Finnish opposite numbers to prepare
9 Jun 2008 : Column WS36
Following the discussion on the framework review, there is the adoption of council conclusions on a common approach to the use of the spectrum released by digital switchover. The Commission published its communication in November, and this included a proposal for a move towards a common spectrum plan in the UHF band at EU level. While it is recognised that there are benefits to harmonisation, I intend to intervene to argue that enforced harmonisation inhibits the development of the market and that consumer-focused services are best allocated on a technology/service-neutral basis. I will welcome the council conclusions which through negotiation now reflect a non-mandatory approach to coordination between member states in the utilisation of the digital dividend.
This will be followed by the council conclusions on Europes digital future i2010 mid-term review. These conclusions invite member states to increase their efforts in taking forward the dossiers that are covered by the strategy, thereby enabling information society and audiovisual media services to contribute to the Lisbon strategy. I will be supporting this, but there is not expected to be any substantive discussion.
The next item is a Commission proposal for political agreement on the duration of the European Network and Information Security Agency. Currently ENISAs mandate expires in 2009 and an extension is required to ensure its continued existence. I intend to support this proposal to ensure that there is continuity in EU network information security until final decisions have been made concerning the establishment of the European Electronic Communications Market Authority. As such, the extension of the ENISA mandate will need to be time-bounded.
The final item on the agenda concerning telecommunications relates to the recently published Commission communication on Advancing the Internet: Action Plan for the Deployment of Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) in Europe. This is essentially about how the internet community can be encouraged to adopt IPv6 addresses in place of the dwindling supply of current IPv4 ones. The detail of this is currently being considered. However, I intend to intervene to say that such deployment should be an orderly industry-led solution where the Commission and governments are supportive, rather than the primary drivers.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Communities and Local Government (Baroness Andrews): My honourable friend the Minister for Local Government (John Healey) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
I am satisfied that financial assistance under the Bellwin scheme is justified to cover eligible costs incurred by six councils following flooding in England in
9 Jun 2008 : Column WS37
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): My honourable friend the Minister of State for Borders and Immigration and Minister for the West Midlands (Liam Byrne) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
Over the next year, the Government are bringing in the biggest shake-up of the immigration system for over 40 years. Today I am laying new immigration rules which complete the roll-out of tier 1 of the points-based system, introducing provisions for highly skilled migrants, entrepreneurs, investors and recent graduates from UK universities. Worldwide we will also be introducing the entrepreneur, investor and post-study work categories. This meets the target I announced last year on time. Tier 1 replaces eight former immigration categories, in line with our commitment to simplifying the immigration system.
The plan outlines the ways in which the Government will deliver on these promises through new programmes and the unique added value of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games to existing programmes. As such there is no discrete legacy budget; rather we are creating Olympic value by drawing together programmes from across government.
A robust and transparent governance system has also been put in place to drive progress, and this will be monitored alongside the delivery of PSA 22 (Deliver a successful Olympic Games and Paralympic Games with a sustainable legacy and get more children and young people taking part in high quality PE and sport).
This is the Governments first detailed Statement on legacy, and it is the first time that a host city has published such a document before their Olympiad has even begun. Further programmes will be created and existing programmes and ideas developed over the next four years and we will report on progress regularly.
Copies of the legacy action plan are available at www.culture.gov.uk and will be deposited in the Libraries of both Houses.
|Next Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|